阅读更多

3顶
4踩

移动开发
Google去年11月正式发布了Android 4.4,代号为KitKat(奇巧,雀巢的一款巧克力品牌),该系统带来了诸多新的特性

但需要注意的是,该系统可能会让你之前一直正常使用的SD卡变为无用的“摆设”,因为根据新版本的API改进,应用程序将不能再往SD卡中写入文件。

来看Android开发者网站的“外部存储技术信息”文档中的描述:

引用
WRITE_EXTERNAL_STORAGE只为设备上的主要外部存储授予写权限,应用程序无法将数据写入二级外部存储设备,除非指定了应用程序允许访问的特定的目录。


这目前只影响双存储设备,如果你的设备有内部存储空间,即通常所说的机身存储(这就是指主要外部存储),那么你的SD卡就是一个二级外部存储设备。

在Android 4.4中,如果你同时使用了机身存储和SD卡,那么应用程序将无法在SD卡中创建、修改、删除数据。比如,你无法使用文件管理器通过无线网络从电脑往SD卡中复制文件了。但是应用程序仍然可以往主存储的任意目录中写入数据,不受任何限制。

Google表示,这样做的目的是,通过这种方式进行限制,系统可以在应用程序被卸载后清除遗留文件。

目前三星已经通过OTA向部分手机发送了Android 4.4的更新,已经有Note3用户抱怨FX文件管理器现在不能往SD卡中复制内容了。

解决办法

获得系统的ROOT权限是一个解决方法。

很显然,这是针对用户的解决办法,但是并不是所有的用户都愿意进行ROOT,那么需要SD卡写入权限的开发者该如何做呢?

XDA论坛已经有大神给出了解决方案——在应用中嵌入一段代码,这段代码作用是在Android 4.4+设备上,如果其他方式写入失败,则将数据写入二级存储设备。

详细方案:http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=50008987

/*
 * Copyright (C) 2014 NextApp, Inc.
 * 
 * Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
 * You may obtain a copy of the License at
 * 
 * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
 * 
 * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS"
 * BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the specific language
 * governing permissions and limitations under the License.
 */

package nextapp.mediafile;

import java.io.File;
import java.io.IOException;
import java.io.OutputStream;

import android.content.ContentResolver;
import android.content.ContentValues;
import android.net.Uri;
import android.provider.MediaStore;

/**
 * Wrapper for manipulating files via the Android Media Content Provider. As of Android 4.4 KitKat, applications can no longer write
 * to the "secondary storage" of a device. Write operations using the java.io.File API will thus fail. This class restores access to
 * those write operations by way of the Media Content Provider.
 * 
 * Note that this class relies on the internal operational characteristics of the media content provider API, and as such is not
 * guaranteed to be future-proof. Then again, we did all think the java.io.File API was going to be future-proof for media card
 * access, so all bets are off.
 * 
 * If you're forced to use this class, it's because Google/AOSP made a very poor API decision in Android 4.4 KitKat.
 * Read more at https://plus.google.com/+TodLiebeck/posts/gjnmuaDM8sn
 *
 * Your application must declare the permission "android.permission.WRITE_EXTERNAL_STORAGE".
 */
public class MediaFile {

    private final File file;
    private final ContentResolver contentResolver;
    private final Uri filesUri;
    private final Uri imagesUri;

    public MediaFile(ContentResolver contentResolver, File file) {
        this.file = file;
        this.contentResolver = contentResolver;
        filesUri = MediaStore.Files.getContentUri("external");
        imagesUri = MediaStore.Images.Media.EXTERNAL_CONTENT_URI;
    }

    /**
     * Deletes the file. Returns true if the file has been successfully deleted or otherwise does not exist. This operation is not
     * recursive.
     */
    public boolean delete()
            throws IOException {
        if (!file.exists()) {
            return true;
        }

        boolean directory = file.isDirectory();
        if (directory) {
            // Verify directory does not contain any files/directories within it.
            String[] files = file.list();
            if (files != null && files.length > 0) {
                return false;
            }
        }

        String where = MediaStore.MediaColumns.DATA + "=?";
        String[] selectionArgs = new String[] { file.getAbsolutePath() };

        // Delete the entry from the media database. This will actually delete media files (images, audio, and video).
        contentResolver.delete(filesUri, where, selectionArgs);

        if (file.exists()) {
            // If the file is not a media file, create a new entry suggesting that this location is an image, even
            // though it is not.
            ContentValues values = new ContentValues();
            values.put(MediaStore.Files.FileColumns.DATA, file.getAbsolutePath());
            contentResolver.insert(imagesUri, values);

            // Delete the created entry, such that content provider will delete the file.
            contentResolver.delete(filesUri, where, selectionArgs);
        }

        return !file.exists();
    }

    public File getFile() {
        return file;
    }

    /**
     * Creates a new directory. Returns true if the directory was successfully created or exists.
     */
    public boolean mkdir()
            throws IOException {
        if (file.exists()) {
            return file.isDirectory();
        }

        ContentValues values;
        Uri uri;

        // Create a media database entry for the directory. This step will not actually cause the directory to be created.
        values = new ContentValues();
        values.put(MediaStore.Files.FileColumns.DATA, file.getAbsolutePath());
        contentResolver.insert(filesUri, values);

        // Create an entry for a temporary image file within the created directory.
        // This step actually causes the creation of the directory.
        values = new ContentValues();
        values.put(MediaStore.Files.FileColumns.DATA, file.getAbsolutePath() + "/temp.jpg");
        uri = contentResolver.insert(imagesUri, values);

        // Delete the temporary entry.
        contentResolver.delete(uri, null, null);

        return file.exists();
    }

    /**
     * Returns an OutputStream to write to the file. The file will be truncated immediately.
     */
    public OutputStream write()
            throws IOException {
        if (file.exists() && file.isDirectory()) {
            throw new IOException("File exists and is a directory.");
        }

        // Delete any existing entry from the media database.
        // This may also delete the file (for media types), but that is irrelevant as it will be truncated momentarily in any case.
        String where = MediaStore.MediaColumns.DATA + "=?";
        String[] selectionArgs = new String[] { file.getAbsolutePath() };
        contentResolver.delete(filesUri, where, selectionArgs);

        ContentValues values = new ContentValues();
        values.put(MediaStore.Files.FileColumns.DATA, file.getAbsolutePath());
        Uri uri = contentResolver.insert(filesUri, values);

        if (uri == null) {
            // Should not occur.
            throw new IOException("Internal error.");
        }

        return contentResolver.openOutputStream(uri);
    }
}


Via Tod Liebeck
3
4
评论 共 7 条 请登录后发表评论
7 楼 254403415 2014-09-04 16:00
LZ 改外置卡文件的名字怎么弄??求指教啊!!
6 楼 Stream.Town 2014-02-21 16:08
不能因为蛋疼就直接把蛋切了啊,这做法也太激进了吧
5 楼 shinkadoki 2014-02-21 09:50
标题党……
4 楼 hhhhkkkk 2014-02-20 06:37
应该这样,现在的SD卡上的目录让人蛋疼,不过也一刀切的太厉害了,应用之间共享文档不方便,搞的和苹果一样了,应有文档、音频、视频、照片等几个统一目录,给这几个统一目录分别设置相应的读写权限。
3 楼 caizi12 2014-02-19 20:48
dsjt 写道
安卓手机SD卡根目录下满屏幕的APP文档文件夹确实蛋疼。

蛋疼,那也不能这样设计啊。

这样设计不太蛋疼。
2 楼 dsjt 2014-02-19 14:33
安卓手机SD卡根目录下满屏幕的APP文档文件夹确实蛋疼。
1 楼 kgm000 2014-02-19 11:36
不错~谢谢分享

发表评论

您还没有登录,请您登录后再发表评论

相关推荐

Global site tag (gtag.js) - Google Analytics