浏览 1498 次
锁定老帖子 主题:RWH CH02 Notes
精华帖 (0) :: 良好帖 (0) :: 新手帖 (0) :: 隐藏帖 (0)
|
|
---|---|
作者 | 正文 |
发表时间:2010-08-04
最后修改:2010-08-04
Haskell is strong and static language.
*Main> head [1..10] 1 *Main> tail [1..10] [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10] *Main> take 3 [1..10] [1,2,3] *Main> drop 3 [1..10] [4,5,6,7,8,9,10] *Main> last [1..10] 10 *Main> fst ('a' , 3) 'a' *Main> snd ('a', 3) 3
We cannot assign a value to x twice.
*Main> let x = 10 *Main> x = 11 <interactive>:1:2: parse error on input `='
Recall that Haskell is an expression-oriented language. In an imperative language, it can make sense to omit the else branch from an if, because we're working with statements, not expressions. However, when we're working with expressions, an if that was missing an else wouldn't have a result or type if the predicate evaluated to False, so it would be nonsensical.
In Haskell, we can easily define a new function that short circuits benefit from haskell's lazy evaluation.
Answer to "Write a function lastButOne, that returns the element before the last."
lastButOne :: [a] -> a lastButOne (x:y:xs) = if null xs then x else lastButOne (y:xs)
But it might make a mistake for too short list.
声明:ITeye文章版权属于作者,受法律保护。没有作者书面许可不得转载。
推荐链接
|
|
返回顶楼 | |