`

【转】Understanding Weak References

阅读更多

      在Java code实践中,需要使用Weak References。对这个东东不了解,故Google了一下,找到了下面这个web,用以作为入门。下面对其全文转一下。

      Understanding Weak References


Posted by enicholas on May 4, 2006 at 7:06 PM CDT

Some time ago I was interviewing candidates for a Senior Java Engineer position. Among the many questions I asked was "What can you tell me about weak references?" I wasn't expecting a detailed technical treatise on the subject. I would probably have been satisfied with "Umm... don't they have something to do with garbage collection?" I was instead surprised to find that out of twenty-odd engineers, all of whom had at least five years of Java experience and good qualifications, only two of them even knew that weak references existed, and only one of those two had actual useful knowledge about them. I even explained a bit about them, to see if I got an "Oh yeah" from anybody -- nope. I'm not sure why this knowledge is (evidently) uncommon, as weak references are a massively useful feature which have been around since Java 1.2 was released, over seven years ago.

 

Now, I'm not suggesting you need to be a weak reference expert to qualify as a decent Java engineer. But I humbly submit that you should at least know what they are -- otherwise how will you know when you should be using them? Since they seem to be a little-known feature, here is a brief overview of what weak references are, how to use them, and when to use them.

 

Strong references

 

First I need to start with a refresher on strong references . A strong reference is an ordinary Java reference, the kind you use every day. For example, the code:

 

StringBuffer buffer = new StringBuffer();
 

creates a new StringBuffer() and stores a strong reference to it in the variable buffer . Yes, yes, this is kiddie stuff, but bear with me. The important part about strong references -- the part that makes them "strong" -- is how they interact with the garbage collector. Specifically, if an object is reachable via a chain of strong references (strongly reachable), it is not eligible for garbage collection. As you don't want the garbage collector destroying objects you're working on, this is normally exactly what you want.

 

 

When strong references are too strong

 

It's not uncommon for an application to use classes that it can't reasonably extend. The class might simply be marked final , or it could be something more complicated, such as an interface returned by a factory method backed by an unknown (and possibly even unknowable) number of concrete implementations. Suppose you have to use a class Widget and, for whatever reason, it isn't possible or practical to extend Widget to add new functionality.

 

What happens when you need to keep track of extra information about the object? In this case, suppose we find ourselves needing to keep track of each Widget's serial number, but the Widget class doesn't actually have a serial number property -- and because Widget isn't extensible, we can't add one. No problem at all, that's what HashMaps are for:

 

serialNumberMap.put(widget, widgetSerialNumber);
 

This might look okay on the surface, but the strong reference to widget will almost certainly cause problems. We have to know (with 100% certainty) when a particular Widget's serial number is no longer needed, so we can remove its entry from the map. Otherwise we're going to have a memory leak (if we don't remove Widgets when we should) or we're going to inexplicably find ourselves missing serial numbers (if we remove Widgets that we're still using). If these problems sound familiar, they should: they are exactly the problems that users of non-garbage-collected languages face when trying to manage memory, and we're not supposed to have to worry about this in a more civilized language like Java.

 

Another common problem with strong references is caching, particular with very large structures like images. Suppose you have an application which has to work with user-supplied images, like the web site design tool I work on. Naturally you want to cache these images, because loading them from disk is very expensive and you want to avoid the possibility of having two copies of the (potentially gigantic) image in memory at once.

 

Because an image cache is supposed to prevent us from reloading images when we don't absolutely need to, you will quickly realize that the cache should always contain a reference to any image which is already in memory. With ordinary strong references, though, that reference itself will force the image to remain in memory, which requires you (just as above) to somehow determine when the image is no longer needed in memory and remove it from the cache, so that it becomes eligible for garbage collection. Once again you are forced to duplicate the behavior of the garbage collector and manually determine whether or not an object should be in memory.

 

Weak references

 

A weak reference , simply put, is a reference that isn't strong enough to force an object to remain in memory. Weak references allow you to leverage the garbage collector's ability to determine reachability for you, so you don't have to do it yourself. You create a weak reference like this:

 

WeakReference<Widget> weakWidget = new WeakReference<Widget>(widget);
 

and then elsewhere in the code you can use weakWidget.get() to get the actual Widget object. Of course the weak reference isn't strong enough to prevent garbage collection, so you may find (if there are no strong references to the widget) that weakWidget.get() suddenly starts returning null .

 

To solve the "widget serial number" problem above, the easiest thing to do is use the built-in WeakHashMap class. WeakHashMap works exactly like HashMap , except that the keys (not the values!) are referred to using weak references. If a WeakHashMap key becomes garbage, its entry is removed automatically. This avoids the pitfalls I described and requires no changes other than the switch from HashMap to a WeakHashMap . If you're following the standard convention of referring to your maps via the Map interface, no other code needs to even be aware of the change.

 

Reference queues

 

Once a WeakReference starts returning null , the object it pointed to has become garbage and the WeakReference WeakHashMap , for example, has to remove such defunct entries to avoid holding onto an ever-increasing number of dead WeakReferences . object is pretty much useless. This generally means that some sort of cleanup is required;

The ReferenceQueue class makes it easy to keep track of dead references. If you pass a ReferenceQueue into a weak reference's constructor, the reference object will be automatically inserted into the reference queue when the object to which it pointed becomes garbage. You can then, at some regular interval, process the ReferenceQueue and perform whatever cleanup is needed for dead references.

 

Different degrees of weakness

 

Up to this point I've just been referring to "weak references", but there are actually four different degrees of reference strength: strong, soft, weak, and phantom, in order from strongest to weakest. We've already discussed strong and weak references, so let's take a look at the other two.

 

Soft references

 

A soft reference is exactly like a weak reference, except that it is less eager to throw away the object to which it refers. An object which is only weakly reachable (the strongest references to it are WeakReferences ) will be discarded at the next garbage collection cycle, but an object which is softly reachable will generally stick around for a while.

 

SoftReferences aren't required to behave any differently than WeakReferences , but in practice softly reachable objects are generally retained as long as memory is in plentiful supply. This makes them an excellent foundation for a cache, such as the image cache described above, since you can let the garbage collector worry about both how reachable the objects are (a strongly reachable object will never be removed from the cache) and how badly it needs the memory they are consuming.

 

Phantom references

 

A phantom reference is quite different than either SoftReference or WeakReference . Its grip on its object is so tenuous that you can't even retrieve the object -- its get() method always returns null . The only use for such a reference is keeping track of when it gets enqueued into a ReferenceQueue , as at that point you know the object to which it pointed is dead. How is that different from WeakReference , though?

The difference is in exactly when the enqueuing happens. WeakReferences are enqueued as soon as the object to which they point becomes weakly reachable. This is before finalization or garbage collection has actually happened; in theory the object could even be "resurrected" by an unorthodox finalize() method, but the WeakReference would remain dead. PhantomReferences are enqueued only when the object is physically removed from memory, and the get() method always returns null specifically to prevent you from being able to "resurrect" an almost-dead object.

 

What good are PhantomReferences ? I'm only aware of two serious cases for them: first, they allow you to determine exactly when an object was removed from memory. They are in fact the only way to determine that. This isn't generally that useful, but might come in handy in certain very specific circumstances like manipulating large images: if you know for sure that an image should be garbage collected, you can wait until it actually is before attempting to load the next image, and therefore make the dreaded OutOfMemoryError less likely.

 

Second, PhantomReferences avoid a fundamental problem with finalization: finalize() methods can "resurrect" objects by creating new strong references to them. So what, you say? Well, the problem is that an object which overrides finalize() must now be determined to be garbage in at least two separate garbage collection cycles in order to be collected. When the first cycle determines that it is garbage, it becomes eligible for finalization. Because of the (slim, but unfortunately real) possibility that the object was "resurrected" during finalization, the garbage collector has to run again before the object can actually be removed. And because finalization might not have happened in a timely fashion, an arbitrary number of garbage collection cycles might have happened while the object was waiting for finalization. This can mean serious delays in actually cleaning up garbage objects, and is why you can get OutOfMemoryErrors even when most of the heap is garbage.

 

With PhantomReference , this situation is impossible -- when a PhantomReference is enqueued, there is absolutely no way to get a pointer to the now-dead object (which is good, because it isn't in memory any longer). Because PhantomReference cannot be used to resurrect an object, the object can be instantly cleaned up during the first garbage collection cycle in which it is found to be phantomly reachable. You can then dispose whatever resources you need to at your convenience.

 

Arguably, the finalize() method should never have been provided in the first place. PhantomReferences are definitely safer and more efficient to use, and eliminating finalize() would have made parts of the VM considerably simpler. But, they're also more work to implement, so I confess to still using finalize() most of the time. The good news is that at least you have a choice.

 

Conclusion

 

I'm sure some of you are grumbling by now, as I'm talking about an API which is nearly a decade old and haven't said anything which hasn't been said before. While that's certainly true, in my experience many Java programmers really don't know very much (if anything) about weak references, and I felt that a refresher course was needed. Hopefully you at least learned a little something from this review.

分享到:
评论

相关推荐

    iOS Programming: The Big Nerd Ranch Guide (4th Edition) 2014 epub

    ARC and strong and weak references Handling touch events and gestures Toolbars, navigation controllers, and split view controllers Using Auto Layout to scale user interfaces Using Dynamic Type to ...

    SNS单模无芯光纤仿真与传感器结构特性分析——基于Rsoft beamprop模块

    内容概要:本文主要探讨了SNS单模无芯光纤的仿真分析及其在通信和传感领域的应用潜力。首先介绍了模间干涉仿真的重要性,利用Rsoft beamprop模块模拟不同模式光在光纤中的传播情况,进而分析光纤的传输性能和模式特性。接着讨论了光纤传输特性的仿真,包括损耗、色散和模式耦合等参数的评估。随后,文章分析了光纤的结构特性,如折射率分布、包层和纤芯直径对性能的影响,并探讨了镀膜技术对光纤性能的提升作用。最后,进行了变形仿真分析,研究外部因素导致的光纤变形对其性能的影响。通过这些分析,为优化光纤设计提供了理论依据。 适合人群:从事光纤通信、光学工程及相关领域的研究人员和技术人员。 使用场景及目标:适用于需要深入了解SNS单模无芯光纤特性和优化设计的研究项目,旨在提高光纤性能并拓展其应用场景。 其他说明:本文不仅提供了详细的仿真方法和技术细节,还对未来的发展方向进行了展望,强调了SNS单模无芯光纤在未来通信和传感领域的重要地位。

    发那科USM通讯程序socket-rece

    发那科USM通讯程序socket-set

    嵌入式八股文面试题库资料知识宝典-WIFI.zip

    嵌入式八股文面试题库资料知识宝典-WIFI.zip

    JS+HTML源码与image

    源码与image

    物流行业车辆路径优化:基于遗传算法和其他优化算法的MATLAB实现及应用

    内容概要:本文详细探讨了物流行业中路径规划与车辆路径优化(VRP)的问题,特别是针对冷链物流、带时间窗的车辆路径优化(VRPTW)、考虑充电桩的车辆路径优化(EVRP)以及多配送中心情况下的路径优化。文中不仅介绍了遗传算法、蚁群算法、粒子群算法等多种优化算法的理论背景,还提供了完整的MATLAB代码及注释,帮助读者理解这些算法的具体实现。此外,文章还讨论了如何通过MATLAB处理大量数据和复杂计算,以得出最优的路径方案。 适合人群:从事物流行业的研究人员和技术人员,尤其是对路径优化感兴趣的开发者和工程师。 使用场景及目标:适用于需要优化车辆路径的企业和个人,旨在提高配送效率、降低成本、确保按时交付货物。通过学习本文提供的算法和代码,读者可以在实际工作中应用这些优化方法,提升物流系统的性能。 其他说明:为了更好地理解和应用这些算法,建议读者参考相关文献和教程进行深入学习。同时,实际应用中还需根据具体情况进行参数调整和优化。

    嵌入式八股文面试题库资料知识宝典-C and C++ normal interview_8.doc.zip

    嵌入式八股文面试题库资料知识宝典-C and C++ normal interview_8.doc.zip

    基于灰狼优化算法的城市路径规划Matlab实现——解决TSP问题

    内容概要:本文介绍了基于灰狼优化算法(GWO)的城市路径规划优化问题(TSP),并通过Matlab实现了该算法。文章详细解释了GWO算法的工作原理,包括寻找猎物、围捕猎物和攻击猎物三个阶段,并提供了具体的代码示例。通过不断迭代优化路径,最终得到最优的城市路径规划方案。与传统TSP求解方法相比,GWO算法具有更好的全局搜索能力和较快的收敛速度,适用于复杂的城市环境。尽管如此,算法在面对大量城市节点时仍面临运算时间和参数设置的挑战。 适合人群:对路径规划、优化算法感兴趣的科研人员、学生以及从事交通规划的专业人士。 使用场景及目标:①研究和开发高效的路径规划算法;②优化城市交通系统,提升出行效率;③探索人工智能在交通领域的应用。 其他说明:文中提到的代码可以作为学习和研究的基础,但实际应用中需要根据具体情况调整算法参数和优化策略。

    嵌入式八股文面试题库资料知识宝典-Intel3.zip

    嵌入式八股文面试题库资料知识宝典-Intel3.zip

    嵌入式八股文面试题库资料知识宝典-2019京东C++.zip

    嵌入式八股文面试题库资料知识宝典-2019京东C++.zip

    嵌入式八股文面试题库资料知识宝典-北京光桥科技有限公司面试题.zip

    嵌入式八股文面试题库资料知识宝典-北京光桥科技有限公司面试题.zip

    物理学领域十字形声子晶体的能带与传输特性研究及应用

    内容概要:本文详细探讨了十字形声子晶体的能带结构和传输特性。首先介绍了声子晶体作为新型周期性结构在物理学和工程学中的重要地位,特别是十字形声子晶体的独特结构特点。接着从散射体的形状、大小、排列周期等方面分析了其对能带结构的影响,并通过理论计算和仿真获得了能带图。随后讨论了十字形声子晶体的传输特性,即它对声波的调控能力,包括传播速度、模式和能量分布的变化。最后通过大量实验和仿真验证了理论分析的正确性,并得出结论指出散射体的材料、形状和排列方式对其性能有重大影响。 适合人群:从事物理学、材料科学、声学等相关领域的研究人员和技术人员。 使用场景及目标:适用于希望深入了解声子晶体尤其是十字形声子晶体能带与传输特性的科研工作者,旨在为相关领域的创新和发展提供理论支持和技术指导。 其他说明:文中还对未来的研究方向进行了展望,强调了声子晶体在未来多个领域的潜在应用价值。

    嵌入式系统开发_USB主机控制器_Arduino兼容开源硬件_基于Mega32U4和MAX3421E芯片的USB设备扩展开发板_支持多种USB外设接入与控制的通用型嵌入式开发平台_.zip

    嵌入式系统开发_USB主机控制器_Arduino兼容开源硬件_基于Mega32U4和MAX3421E芯片的USB设备扩展开发板_支持多种USB外设接入与控制的通用型嵌入式开发平台_

    e2b8a-main.zip

    e2b8a-main.zip

    少儿编程scratch项目源代码文件案例素材-火柴人跑酷(2).zip

    少儿编程scratch项目源代码文件案例素材-火柴人跑酷(2).zip

    【HarmonyOS分布式技术】远程启动子系统详解:跨设备无缝启动与智能协同的应用场景及未来展望

    内容概要:本文详细介绍了HarmonyOS分布式远程启动子系统,该系统作为HarmonyOS的重要组成部分,旨在打破设备间的界限,实现跨设备无缝启动、智能设备选择和数据同步与连续性等功能。通过分布式软总线和分布式数据管理技术,它能够快速、稳定地实现设备间的通信和数据同步,为用户提供便捷的操作体验。文章还探讨了该系统在智能家居、智能办公和教育等领域的应用场景,展示了其在提升效率和用户体验方面的巨大潜力。最后,文章展望了该系统的未来发展,强调其在技术优化和应用场景拓展上的无限可能性。 适合人群:对HarmonyOS及其分布式技术感兴趣的用户、开发者和行业从业者。 使用场景及目标:①理解HarmonyOS分布式远程启动子系统的工作原理和技术细节;②探索该系统在智能家居、智能办公和教育等领域的具体应用场景;③了解该系统为开发者提供的开发优势和实践要点。 其他说明:本文不仅介绍了HarmonyOS分布式远程启动子系统的核心技术和应用场景,还展望了其未来的发展方向。通过阅读本文,用户可以全面了解该系统如何通过技术创新提升设备间的协同能力和用户体验,为智能生活带来新的变革。

    嵌入式八股文面试题库资料知识宝典-C and C++ normal interview_1.zip

    嵌入式八股文面试题库资料知识宝典-C and C++ normal interview_1.zip

    少儿编程scratch项目源代码文件案例素材-激光反弹.zip

    少儿编程scratch项目源代码文件案例素材-激光反弹.zip

Global site tag (gtag.js) - Google Analytics