- 浏览: 151122 次
- 性别:
- 来自: 长沙
文章分类
最新评论
-
冲杯茶喝:
C++没学好,没大看懂,是不是返回的hash值就是返回的hea ...
Java中Object类hashCode的实现 -
yoyo08:
同意lz的观点
写作能力很重要 -
xinglongbing:
liangwenzheng 写道
引用
真正的能力不是把你喜欢 ...
真正的强者 -
liangwenzheng:
引用真正的能力不是把你喜欢的事情做得有多好,而是你把不喜欢的事 ...
真正的强者 -
xinglongbing:
谢谢这位兄弟提供新的思路 呵呵
若问题是递归的,采用递归的确可 ...
又一道笔试题
在ZangXT的帮助下,跟踪Object类的native方法hashCode方法从jvm源码中得到了下面的一些内容,供参考。
Object中hashCode方法是一个本地方法:public native int hashCode();
对于Java HotSpot VM,首先介绍一个概念就是对象的header,每个对象都会有一个header,header由两个机器字表示(8个字节对于32位架构,16个字节对于64位架构)。header的第一个字中有7位用做同步及垃圾收集,另外25位存储对象的hash码。header的第二个字存储指向对应Class对象的指针(Class对象用来保存类的元数据信息及方法表)。
这里要追踪的就是存放在对象header中的那25位hash码。
在JVM的\hotspot\src\share\vm\oops\markOop.hpp文件中有对markOop类的说明:
The markOop describes the header of an object.即markOop是用来描述对象的header的。
其中包含有产生hash值的函数,如下:
// hash operations
intptr_t hash() const {
return mask_bits(value() >> hash_shift, hash_mask);
}
以下是markOop中包含的类markOopDesc,其中包含了描述对象的一些数据结构:当然也包含了产生hash值所必须的一些信息下面用红色作为标记:
class markOopDesc: public oopDesc {
private:
// Conversion
uintptr_t value() const { return (uintptr_t) this; }
public:
// Constants
enum { age_bits = 4,
lock_bits = 2,
biased_lock_bits = 1,
max_hash_bits = BitsPerWord - age_bits - lock_bits - biased_lock_bits,
hash_bits = max_hash_bits > 31 ? 31 : max_hash_bits,
epoch_bits = 2
};
// The biased locking code currently requires that the age bits be
// contiguous to the lock bits. Class data sharing would prefer the
// hash bits to be lower down to provide more random hash codes for
// shared read-only symbolOop objects, because these objects' mark
// words are set to their own address with marked_value in the lock
// bit, and using lower bits would make their identity hash values
// more random. However, the performance decision was made in favor
// of the biased locking code.
enum { lock_shift = 0,
biased_lock_shift = lock_bits,
age_shift = lock_bits + biased_lock_bits,
hash_shift = lock_bits + biased_lock_bits + age_bits,
epoch_shift = hash_shift
};
enum { lock_mask = right_n_bits(lock_bits),
lock_mask_in_place = lock_mask << lock_shift,
biased_lock_mask = right_n_bits(lock_bits + biased_lock_bits),
biased_lock_mask_in_place= biased_lock_mask << lock_shift,
biased_lock_bit_in_place = 1 << biased_lock_shift,
age_mask = right_n_bits(age_bits),
age_mask_in_place = age_mask << age_shift,
epoch_mask = right_n_bits(epoch_bits),
epoch_mask_in_place = epoch_mask << epoch_shift
#ifndef _WIN64
,hash_mask = right_n_bits(hash_bits),
hash_mask_in_place = (address_word)hash_mask << hash_shift
#endif
};
// Alignment of JavaThread pointers encoded in object header required by biased locking
enum { biased_lock_alignment = 2 << (epoch_shift + epoch_bits)
};
#ifdef _WIN64
// These values are too big for Win64
const static uintptr_t hash_mask = right_n_bits(hash_bits);
const static uintptr_t hash_mask_in_place =
(address_word)hash_mask << hash_shift;
#endif
enum { locked_value = 0,
unlocked_value = 1,
monitor_value = 2,
marked_value = 3,
biased_lock_pattern = 5
};
enum { no_hash = 0 }; // no hash value assigned
enum { no_hash_in_place = (address_word)no_hash << hash_shift,
no_lock_in_place = unlocked_value
};
enum { max_age = age_mask };
enum { max_bias_epoch = epoch_mask };
我们知道hash值的产生最终依赖于另一个函数mask_bits:
\hotspot\src\share\vm\utilities\globalDefinitions.hpp中对mask_bits进行了定义:
// get a word with the n.th or the right-most or left-most n bits set // (note: #define used only so that they can be used in enum constant definitions) #define nth_bit(n) (n >= BitsPerWord ? 0 : OneBit << (n)) #define right_n_bits(n) (nth_bit(n) - 1) #define left_n_bits(n) (right_n_bits(n) << (n >= BitsPerWord ? 0 : (BitsPerWord - n))) // bit-operations using a mask m inline void set_bits (intptr_t& x, intptr_t m) { x |= m; } inline void clear_bits (intptr_t& x, intptr_t m) { x &= ~m; } inline intptr_t mask_bits (intptr_t x, intptr_t m) { return x & m; } inline jlong mask_long_bits (jlong x, jlong m) { return x & m; } inline bool mask_bits_are_true (intptr_t flags, intptr_t mask) { return (flags & mask) == mask; }
由此已经找到了产生hash值的根源,根据定义看出该hash值跟多个对象头部中的变量有关。
/hotspot/src/share/vm/prims/jvm.cpp中的定义:
// java.lang.Object ///////////////////////////////////////////////
JVM_ENTRY(jint, JVM_IHashCode(JNIEnv* env, jobject handle))
JVMWrapper("JVM_IHashCode");
// as implemented in the classic virtual machine; return 0 if object is NULL
return handle == NULL ? 0 : ObjectSynchronizer::FastHashCode (THREAD, JNIHandles::resolve_non_null(handle)) ;
JVM_END
\hotspot\src\share\vm\runtime\synchronizer.hpp中对hash value的产生的描述:// Returns the identity hash value for an oop // NOTE: It may cause monitor inflation static intptr_t identity_hash_value_for(Handle obj); static intptr_t FastHashCode (Thread * Self, oop obj) ; \hotspot\src\share\vm\runtime\synchronizer.cpp 中对上述两个函数: FastHashCode identity_hash_value_for的具体实现: intptr_t ObjectSynchronizer::FastHashCode (Thread * Self, oop obj) { if (UseBiasedLocking) { // NOTE: many places throughout the JVM do not expect a safepoint // to be taken here, in particular most operations on perm gen // objects. However, we only ever bias Java instances and all of // the call sites of identity_hash that might revoke biases have // been checked to make sure they can handle a safepoint. The // added check of the bias pattern is to avoid useless calls to // thread-local storage. if (obj->mark()->has_bias_pattern()) { // Box and unbox the raw reference just in case we cause a STW safepoint. Handle hobj (Self, obj) ; // Relaxing assertion for bug 6320749. assert (Universe::verify_in_progress() || !SafepointSynchronize::is_at_safepoint(), "biases should not be seen by VM thread here"); BiasedLocking::revoke_and_rebias(hobj, false, JavaThread::current()); obj = hobj() ; assert(!obj->mark()->has_bias_pattern(), "biases should be revoked by now"); } } // hashCode() is a heap mutator ... // Relaxing assertion for bug 6320749. assert (Universe::verify_in_progress() || !SafepointSynchronize::is_at_safepoint(), "invariant") ; assert (Universe::verify_in_progress() || Self->is_Java_thread() , "invariant") ; assert (Universe::verify_in_progress() || ((JavaThread *)Self)->thread_state() != _thread_blocked, "invariant") ; ObjectMonitor* monitor = NULL; markOop temp, test; intptr_t hash; markOop mark = ReadStableMark (obj); // object should remain ineligible for biased locking assert (!mark->has_bias_pattern(), "invariant") ; if (mark->is_neutral()) { hash = mark->hash(); // this is a normal header if (hash) { // if it has hash, just return it return hash; } hash = get_next_hash(Self, obj); // allocate a new hash code temp = mark->copy_set_hash(hash); // merge the hash code into header // use (machine word version) atomic operation to install the hash test = (markOop) Atomic::cmpxchg_ptr(temp, obj->mark_addr(), mark); if (test == mark) { return hash; } // If atomic operation failed, we must inflate the header // into heavy weight monitor. We could add more code here // for fast path, but it does not worth the complexity. } else if (mark->has_monitor()) { monitor = mark->monitor(); temp = monitor->header(); assert (temp->is_neutral(), "invariant") ; hash = temp->hash(); if (hash) { return hash; } // Skip to the following code to reduce code size } else if (Self->is_lock_owned((address)mark->locker())) { temp = mark->displaced_mark_helper(); // this is a lightweight monitor owned assert (temp->is_neutral(), "invariant") ; hash = temp->hash(); // by current thread, check if the displaced if (hash) { // header contains hash code return hash; } // WARNING: // The displaced header is strictly immutable. // It can NOT be changed in ANY cases. So we have // to inflate the header into heavyweight monitor // even the current thread owns the lock. The reason // is the BasicLock (stack slot) will be asynchronously // read by other threads during the inflate() function. // Any change to stack may not propagate to other threads // correctly. } // Inflate the monitor to set hash code monitor = ObjectSynchronizer::inflate(Self, obj); // Load displaced header and check it has hash code mark = monitor->header(); assert (mark->is_neutral(), "invariant") ; hash = mark->hash(); if (hash == 0) { hash = get_next_hash(Self, obj); temp = mark->copy_set_hash(hash); // merge hash code into header assert (temp->is_neutral(), "invariant") ; test = (markOop) Atomic::cmpxchg_ptr(temp, monitor, mark); if (test != mark) { // The only update to the header in the monitor (outside GC) // is install the hash code. If someone add new usage of // displaced header, please update this code hash = test->hash(); assert (test->is_neutral(), "invariant") ; assert (hash != 0, "Trivial unexpected object/monitor header usage."); } } // We finally get the hash return hash; } // Deprecated -- use FastHashCode() instead. intptr_t ObjectSynchronizer::identity_hash_value_for(Handle obj) { return FastHashCode (Thread::current(), obj()) ; }
\hotspot\src\share\vm\utilities\globalDefinitions.hpp中对mask_bits进行了定义:
// get a word with the n.th or the right-most or left-most n bits set // (note: #define used only so that they can be used in enum constant definitions) #define nth_bit(n) (n >= BitsPerWord ? 0 : OneBit << (n)) #define right_n_bits(n) (nth_bit(n) - 1) #define left_n_bits(n) (right_n_bits(n) << (n >= BitsPerWord ? 0 : (BitsPerWord - n))) // bit-operations using a mask m inline void set_bits (intptr_t& x, intptr_t m) { x |= m; } inline void clear_bits (intptr_t& x, intptr_t m) { x &= ~m; } inline intptr_t mask_bits (intptr_t x, intptr_t m) { return x & m; } inline jlong mask_long_bits (jlong x, jlong m) { return x & m; } inline bool mask_bits_are_true (intptr_t flags, intptr_t mask) { return (flags & mask) == mask; }
\hotspot\src\share\vm\oops\markOop.hpp文件中对markOop类的说明:
The markOop describes the header of an object.
其中包含有:
// hash operations
intptr_t hash() const {
return mask_bits(value() >> hash_shift, hash_mask);
}
可见hash函数又是通过mask_bits函数调用返回hash值的,通过返回的值的类型:intptr可以看出返回的应该是对象的地址。不过mask_bits函数最终没有找到;。
Note that the mark is not a real oop but just a word.
// It is placed in the oop hierarchy for historical reasons.
//
// Bit-format of an object header (most significant first):
//
//
// unused:0/25 hash:25/31 age:4 biased_lock:1 lock:2 = 32/64 bits
上面红色标记的文字说明了markOop是用来描述一个对象的头部,其中32位架构中有25位用来存储hash值,其他的7位用于同步和垃圾回收。
// - hash contains the identity hash value: largest value is
// 31 bits, see os::random(). Also, 64-bit vm's require
// a hash value no bigger than 32 bits because they will not
// properly generate a mask larger than that: see library_call.cpp
// and c1_CodePatterns_sparc.cpp.
//
// - the biased lock pattern is used to bias a lock toward a given
// thread. When this pattern is set in the low three bits, the lock
// is either biased toward a given thread or "anonymously" biased,
// indicating that it is possible for it to be biased. When the
// lock is biased toward a given thread, locking and unlocking can
// be performed by that thread without using atomic operations.
// When a lock's bias is revoked, it reverts back to the normal
// locking scheme described below.
//
// Note that we are overloading the meaning of the "unlocked" state
// of the header. Because we steal a bit from the age we can
// guarantee that the bias pattern will never be seen for a truly
// unlocked object.
//
// Note also that the biased state contains the age bits normally
// contained in the object header. Large increases in scavenge
// times were seen when these bits were absent and an arbitrary age
// assigned to all biased objects, because they tended to consume a
// significant fraction of the eden semispaces and were not
// promoted promptly, causing an increase in the amount of copying
// performed. The runtime system aligns all JavaThread* pointers to
// a very large value (currently 128 bytes) to make room for the
// age bits when biased locking is enabled.
//
// [JavaThread* | epoch | age | 1 | 01] lock is biased toward given thread
// [0 | epoch | age | 1 | 01] lock is anonymously biased
//
// - the two lock bits are used to describe three states: locked/unlocked and monitor.
//
// [ptr | 00] locked ptr points to real header on stack
// [header | 0 | 01] unlocked regular object header
// [ptr | 10] monitor inflated lock (header is wapped out)
// [ptr | 11] marked used by markSweep to mark an object
// not valid at any other time
//
// We assume that stack/thread pointers have the lowest two bits cleared.
class markOopDesc: public oopDesc {
private:
// Conversion
uintptr_t value() const { return (uintptr_t) this; }
public:
// Constants
enum { age_bits = 4,
lock_bits = 2,
biased_lock_bits = 1,
max_hash_bits = BitsPerWord - age_bits - lock_bits - biased_lock_bits,
hash_bits = max_hash_bits > 31 ? 31 : max_hash_bits,
epoch_bits = 2
};
// The biased locking code currently requires that the age bits be
// contiguous to the lock bits. Class data sharing would prefer the
// hash bits to be lower down to provide more random hash codes for
// shared read-only symbolOop objects, because these objects' mark
// words are set to their own address with marked_value in the lock
// bit, and using lower bits would make their identity hash values
// more random. However, the performance decision was made in favor
// of the biased locking code.
enum { lock_shift = 0,
biased_lock_shift = lock_bits,
age_shift = lock_bits + biased_lock_bits,
hash_shift = lock_bits + biased_lock_bits + age_bits, //作为hash()函数第一个参数
epoch_shift = hash_shift
};
enum { lock_mask = right_n_bits(lock_bits),
lock_mask_in_place = lock_mask << lock_shift,
biased_lock_mask = right_n_bits(lock_bits + biased_lock_bits),
biased_lock_mask_in_place= biased_lock_mask << lock_shift,
biased_lock_bit_in_place = 1 << biased_lock_shift,
age_mask = right_n_bits(age_bits),
age_mask_in_place = age_mask << age_shift,
epoch_mask = right_n_bits(epoch_bits),
epoch_mask_in_place = epoch_mask << epoch_shift
#ifndef _WIN64
,hash_mask = right_n_bits(hash_bits), //hash_mask作为hash()的第二个参数。
hash_mask_in_place = (address_word)hash_mask << hash_shift
#endif
};
// Alignment of JavaThread pointers encoded in object header required by biased locking
enum { biased_lock_alignment = 2 << (epoch_shift + epoch_bits)
};
#ifdef _WIN64
// These values are too big for Win64
const static uintptr_t hash_mask = right_n_bits(hash_bits);
const static uintptr_t hash_mask_in_place =
(address_word)hash_mask << hash_shift;
#endif
enum { locked_value = 0,
unlocked_value = 1,
monitor_value = 2,
marked_value = 3,
biased_lock_pattern = 5
};
enum { no_hash = 0 }; // no hash value assigned
enum { no_hash_in_place = (address_word)no_hash << hash_shift,
no_lock_in_place = unlocked_value
};
enum { max_age = age_mask };
enum { max_bias_epoch = epoch_mask };
markOopDesc继承自oopDesc
oopDesc在\hotspot\src\share\vm\oops\oop.hpp中的定义:
class oopDesc {
friend class VMStructs;
private:
volatile markOop _mark;
union _metadata {
wideKlassOop _klass;
narrowOop _compressed_klass;
} _metadata;
http://xieyj.iteye.com/?page=2&show_full=true
\hotspot\src\share\vm
\hotspot\src\share\vm\oops
hotspot\src\share\vm\runtime
下面有很多关键的信息,有时间再去看看。
十分感谢ZangXT提供大量的参考信息。
相关推荐
在Java编程语言中,`Object`类是所有类的根,每个自定义类如果没有明确指定父类,都默认继承自`Object`。因此,对`Object`类的理解是每个Java开发者的基本功。本文将深入探讨`Object`类,以及其核心方法`equals()`与...
在Java编程语言中,Object类是所有类的根类,无论是自定义的还是Java库中的类,它们都直接或间接地继承自Object类。这个压缩包文件"详解Java中Object 类的使用.rar"包含了对Java中Object类的深入探讨,通过阅读其中...
这个源码资源是关于Java中的Object类的讲解案例代码。Object类是所有Java类的根类,它定义了一些常用的方法,例如equals()、hashCode()、toString()等。本案例代码将详细展示Object类的使用方法,并提供一些实际场景...
Object类的hashCode的用法 马克-to-win java视频哈希码
"Java中equals、hashcode和==的区别" Java 中 equals、hashcode 和==的区别是 Java 编程语言中一个经常遇到的问题。这三个概念都是用来比较对象的,但是它们之间存在着本质的区别。 首先,==号是Java中的一个...
hashCode 方法是 Java 中 Object 类的一个方法,用于返回对象的哈希码值。这个方法的作用是将对象转换为一个整数值,以便于快速地比较和查找对象。在 Java 中,每个对象都有一个独特的哈希码值,这个值可以用来标识...
`Object` 类是 Java 语言中最基础的类,位于 `java.lang` 包中。它是所有 Java 类的超类,即使程序员在定义一个新类时未明确指定该类继承自任何类,默认情况下,这个类也将继承自 `Object` 类。这意味着 `Object` 类...
在Java中,Hashcode的约定是由Java.lang.Object类中的hashCode方法所规定的。这个方法规定了Hashcode的三个基本原则: 1. 在一个应用程序执行期间,如果一个对象的equals方法做比较所用到的信息没有被修改的话,则...
Object类的hashCode的用法 马克-to-win java视频 哈希码
在Java中,hashCode方法是Object类中的一个重要方法,它是所有Java类的父类。 toString方法是返回对象的字符串表示的方法。它可以将对象的属性转换为字符串,以便于程序内查看对象属性和调试代码。 在Java中,...
Object类的hashCode的用法1---马克-to-win java视频哈希码
在设计和实现类时,根据需要重写`equals()`、`hashCode()`和`toString()`方法,以满足特定的业务需求。同时,理解线程同步方法`wait()`、`notify()`和`notifyAll()`,能够帮助你构建并发安全的代码。
Java Object 类是所有Java类的根,它定义了所有对象都具有的基本行为。在这个实例代码中,我们将深入探讨七个关键知识点,它们是Java Object的基础,对于理解和使用Java编程至关重要。 1. **对象**: 在Java中,...
在Java编程语言中,`hashCode()`和`equals()`方法是对象身份验证的关键组成部分,它们主要用于对象的比较和哈希表(如HashMap、HashSet等)的操作。理解这两个方法的工作原理对于编写高效和可靠的代码至关重要。 ...
在Java编程语言中,`hashCode()`方法是每个对象都继承自`Object`类的一个关键功能。这个方法的主要目的是为对象生成一个整数哈希码,它通常用于优化数据结构,如哈希表(如`HashMap`和`HashSet`)。本教程“如何正确...
Java Object 类是所有Java类的根类,每个自定义的Java类都会无意识或有意识地继承Object类。Object类提供了几个核心的方法,这些方法在处理对象时非常关键,包括equals()、hashCode()、toString()、clone()、...
示例代码展示了如何在 `Person03` 类中实现 `clone` 方法: ```java public Object clone() throws CloneNotSupportedException { return super.clone(); } ``` 总结以上内容,Java 的这些高级特性为开发者提供了...