Comparison of different SQL implementations
The goal of this page — which is a work in progress — is to gather information relevant for people who are porting SQL from one product to another and/or are interested in possibilities and limits of 'cross-product' SQL.
The following tables compare how different DBMS products handle various SQL (and related) features. If possible, the tables also state how the implementations shoulddo things, according to the SQL standard.
I will only write about subjects that I've worked with personally, or subjects which I anticipate to find use for in the near future. Subjects on which there are no significant implementation variances are not covered. Beta-versions of software are not examined.
I'm sorry about the colors. They are a result of wanting to mark each DBMS differently and at the same time wanting to be relatively nice to printers.
If you have corrections or suggestions, please contact me; even notifications about spelling errors are welcome.
Contents:
- Legend, definitions, and notes
- Features
- Data definition language (DDL)
-
The SELECT statement
- Ordering result sets
-
Limiting result sets (RANK() / ROW_NUMBER() / FETCH FIRST / LIMIT / TOP)
- Simple limit
- Top-n (quota-queries)
- Limit—with offset, including a note about the importance of sorting on unique values
- The INSERT statement
- Data types
- Functions and operators
- Constraint handling
-
Mixture of type and operations
- Automatic key generation (IDENTITY/SERIAL/AUTO_INCREMENT)
- Bulk operations
- Command line operations / metadata
- JDBC
- Other topics
- Related work
- Acknowledgments
- TODOs
Legend, definitions, and notes
The following SQL standard and implementations have been examined, if not otherwise stated:
Standard | The latest official version of SQL is SQL:2008.
I don't have access to the official ISO standard text, but Whitemarsh Information Systems Corporation provides arather final draft as a zip-archive, containing several files. Most important to this page is the file No books cover SQL:2008 yet. Regarding the previous standard, SQL:2003, the only book covering the subject is in German which I was never any good at. Therefore, I also use the following book as reference: |
PostgreSQL | PostgreSQL 8.4.1 on CentOS Linux. Documentation |
DB2 | DB2 Express-C v. 9.1 on Fedora Linux. Note that there are differences between various DB2 flavors; this page is about DB2 for "LUW" (Linux/Unix/Windows). Documentation |
MS SQL Server | MS SQL Server 2005 on Windows XP. Microsoft's SQL implementation is sometimes named Transact-SQL, or TSQL. In this document, I'll generally write MSSQL as a short-hand for Microsoft's SQL Server product. Documentation |
MySQL | MySQL Database Server 5.0.18 on Fedora Linux (i.e. MySQL AB's "classic" DBMS product—not MaxDB). Documentation |
Oracle | Oracle Database 11g Release 2 on Red Hat Enterprise Linux. Documentation |
Informix | Informix Dynamic Server Workgroup Edition v. 11.50 on Red Hat Enterprise Linux. Documentation |
The products are running with their default settings. This is important for MySQL and MSSQL: Their interpretation of SQL may be changed rather drastically by adjusting certain configuration options, potentially increasing the level of standard compliance (for MySQL, there is a dedicated documentation page about this). However, such non-default configuration options are not of great value for people writing SQL applications because the developer often cannot rely on non-default configuration settings.
Features
Views
Join types and features
All the DBMSes support basic INNER JOINs, but vary in their support for other join types.
In the following feature chart, a means yes; an empty table cell means no.
Natural joins (only tested: NATURAL LEFT JOIN ) |
||||||
USING -clause |
||||||
FULL joins1 (tested: SELECT...FULL JOIN...ON...=... ) |
||||||
Explicit CROSS JOIN (cartesian product) |
Remarks:
- Note that
FULL
joins may be emulated with a union of a left and a right join.
Data definition language (DDL)
Copying structure
Objective: An existing table, t1 needs to be copied to a new table, t2, without copying data. I.e., only the structure/definition of the table is copied.
The SELECT statement
Ordering result sets
Limiting result sets
Simple limit
Objective: Want to only get n rows in the result set. Usually only makes sense in connection with an ORDER BY
expression.
Note: This is not the same as a top-n query — see next section.
Note also: Some of the queries below may not be legal in all situations, such as in views or sub-queries.
Standard | The SQL standard provides three ways of performing a 'simple limit':
|
PostgreSQL | Supports all standards-based approaches.
In old PostgreSQL versions (versions 8.3 and older), a special PostgreSQL (and MySQL) specific method was used:
Note that Documentation: |
DB2 | Supports all standards-based approaches.
Documentation:
|
MSSQL | Supports the ROW_NUMBER() (since MSSQL 2005) and cursor standards-based approaches; doesn't support FETCH FIRST .
MSSQL 2000 didn't support |
MySQL | Doesn't support the standard. Alternative solution:
|
Oracle | Supports ROW_NUMBER ; doesn't support FETCH FIRST .
As Oracle doesn't allow
A reader of this page told me that using the Oracle-specific |
Informix | Supports neither ROW_NUMBER(), nor FETCH FIRST.
Alternative solution (which is illegal in plain sub-queries): |
Top-n query
Objective: Like the simple limit-query above, but include rows with tie conditions. Thus, the query may return more than n rows.
Some call this a quota-query.
The following examples are based on this table:
SELECT * FROM person ORDER BY age ASC; +----------+-------------+-----+ |PERSON_ID | PERSON_NAME | AGE | +----------+-------------+-----+ | 7 | Hilda | 12 | | 8 | Bill | 12 | | 4 | Joe | 23 | | 2 | Veronica | 23 | | 3 | Michael | 27 | | 9 | Marianne | 27 | | 1 | Ben | 50 | | 10 | Michelle | 50 | | 5 | Irene | 77 | | 6 | Vivian | 77 | +----------+-------------+-----+
Now, we only want the three (n=3) youngest persons displayed, i.e. a result set like this:
+----------+-------------+-----+ |PERSON_ID | PERSON_NAME | AGE | +----------+-------------+-----+ | 7 | Hilda | 12 | | 8 | Bill | 12 | | 4 | Joe | 23 | | 2 | Veronica | 23 | +----------+-------------+-----+
Standard | With standard SQL, there are two principal ways to obtain the wanted data:
In the article Going To Extremes by Joe Celko, there is a description of yet another principle for performing quota queries, using scalar subqueries. Scalar subqueries are more tedious to write but might yield better performance on your system. |
PostgreSQL | Supports the fast standard SQL variant.
In version 8.3 and older, PostgreSQL only supported the slow standard SQL query variant. In practice, a PostgreSQL-only method was used instead, in order to obtain acceptable query performance: (Change |
DB2 | Supports the fast standard SQL variant. |
MSSQL | Supports the fast standard SQL variant.
MSSQL 2000 supported the slow standard SQL variant. In practice, a MSSQL-only expression had to be used instead, in order to obtain acceptable query performance: |
MySQL | Supports the slow standard SQL solution. In practice, this MySQL-specific solution should be used instead, in order to obtain acceptable query performance:
(Change The offset-value 2 is the result of n-1 (remember: n is 3 in these examples). The second argument to the |
Oracle | Supports the fast standard SQL variant. However, as Oracle doesn't like "AS ... " after subqueries (and doesn't require naming of subqueries), the query has to be paraphrased slightly:
(Change |
Informix | On my TODO. |
Limit—with offset
Objective: Want to only get n rows in the result set, and we want the first skip rows in the result set discarded. Usually only makes sense in connection with anORDER BY
expression.
In the recipes below, basic ordering is ASCending, i.e. lowest-first queries. If you want the opposite, then change ASC->DESC
and DESC->ASC
at the places emphasizedlike this.
Standard | The SQL standard provides three ways of performing 'limit with offset':
|
PostgreSQL | Supports all the standards-based approaches.
In version 8.3 and older, cursors should be used, or a special construct: Documentation: |
DB2 | Supports the window function based approach.
Regarding cursors: DB2 for Linux/Unix/Windows doesn't support Documentation: OLAP functions, the FETCH statement. |
MSSQL | Supports the window function and cursor based approaches.
MSSQL 2000 didn't support |
MySQL | Doesn't support the standard approaches. Alternative solution: SELECT columns
In older versions of MySQL, the LIMIT-syntax is less clear: |
Oracle | Supports ROW_NUMBER() . I'm unsure if Oracle's cursor support is standards-compliant.
As Oracle doesn't accept
A reader of this page told me that using the Oracle-specific |
Informix | Supports neither OFFSET ...FETCH FIRST nor ROW_NUMBER . Supports cursors.
An alternative to using cursors is to us an Informix-specific construct: |
FETCH FIRST/LIMIT/TOP queries with offset are often used in a result presentation context: To retrieve only—say—30 rows at a time so that the end-user isn't overwhelmed by the complete result set, but instead is offered a paginated result presentation. In this case, be careful not to (only) sort on a non-unique column.
Consider the following example (where PostgreSQL is used):
SELECT * FROM person ORDER BY age ASC; person_id | person_name | age -----------+-------------+----- 7 | Hilda | 12 8 | Bill | 12 4 | Joe | 23 2 | Veronica | 23 3 | Michael | 27 9 | Marianne | 27 1 | Ben | 50 10 | Michelle | 50 5 | Irene | 77 6 | Vivian | 77
When ordering is performed on the non-unique age-value, ties may occur and it's not guaranteed that the DBMS will fetch the rows in the same order every time.
Instead of the above listing, the DBMS is allowed to return the following display order where Michael and Marianne are displayed in the opposite order compared to above:
SELECT * FROM person ORDER BY age ASC; person_id | person_name | age -----------+-------------+----- 7 | Hilda | 12 8 | Bill | 12 4 | Joe | 23 2 | Veronica | 23 9 | Marianne | 27 3 | Michael | 27 1 | Ben | 50 10 | Michelle | 50 5 | Irene | 77 6 | Vivian | 77
Now, suppose the end-user wants the results displayed five rows at a time. The result set is fetched in two queries where the DBMS happens to sort differently, as above. We will use PostgreSQL's legacy syntax in the example:
SELECT * FROM person ORDER BY age ASC LIMIT 5; person_id | person_name | age -----------+-------------+----- 7 | Hilda | 12 8 | Bill | 12 4 | Joe | 23 2 | Veronica | 23 3 | Michael | 27 SELECT * FROM person ORDER BY age ASC LIMIT 5 OFFSET 5; person_id | person_name | age -----------+-------------+----- 3 | Michael | 27 1 | Ben | 50 10 | Michelle | 50 5 | Irene | 77 6 | Vivian | 77
Notice that Marianne was not displayed in any of the two split result set presentations.
The problem could be avoided if the result set ordering had been done in a deterministic way, i.e. where the unique person_id value was considered in case of a tie:SELECT * FROM person ORDER BY age ASC, person_id ASC ...
This is safer than to pray for the DBMS to behave in a predictable way when handling non-unique values.
Note: If the table is updated between parts of the result set pagination, then the user might still get an inconsistent presentation. If you want to guard against this, too, then you should see if use of an insensitive cursor is an option in your application. Use of cursors to paginate result sets usually require that your application is stateful, which is not the case in many web-application settings. Alternatively, you could let the application cache the complete result set (e.g. in a session if your web application environment provides for sessions).
The INSERT statement
Inserting several rows at a time
Data types
The BOOLEAN type
Standard | The BOOLEAN type is optional (has feature ID T031), which is a bit surprising for such a basic type. However, it seems that endless discussions of how NULL is to be interpreted for a boolean value is holding BOOLEAN from becoming a core type.
The standard says that a BOOLEAN may be one of the following literals:
The DBMS may interpret NULL as equivalent to UNKNOWN. It is unclear from the specification if the DBMS mustsupport UNKNOWN, NULL or both as boolean literals. In this author's opinion, you should forget about the UNKNOWN literal in order to simplify the situation and let the normal SQL three-way logic apply. It's defined that TRUE > FALSE (true larger than false). |
PostgreSQL | Follows the standard.
Accepts NULL as a boolean literal; doesn't accept UNKNOWN as a boolean literal. |
DB2 | Doesn't support the BOOLEAN type. Judging from various JDBC-documentation, it seems that IBM recommends a CHAR(1) field constrained to values '0' and '1' (and perhaps NULL) as the way to store boolean values. |
MSSQL | Doesn't support the BOOLEAN type.
Possible alternative type: the BIT type which may have 0 or 1 (or NULL) as value. If you insert an integer value other than these into a field of type BIT, then the inserted value will silently be converted to 1. Rudy Limeback has some notes about oddities with the MSSQL BIT type. |
MySQL | Offers a non-conforming BOOLEAN type. MySQL's BOOLEAN is one of many aliases to its TINYINT(1) type.
(Take care if you use TINYINT(1) and JDBC with MySQL and expect to get non-boolean values from it.) MySQL accepts the literals TRUE and FALSE as aliases to 1 and 0, respectively. However, you may also assign a value of — e.g. — 9 to a column of type BOOLEAN (which is non-conforming). If you use JDBC with MySQL, then BOOLEAN is the preferred type for booleans: MySQL's JDBC-driver implicitly converts between Java's boolean and MySQL's pseudo-BOOLEAN type. Side note: MySQL has a |
Oracle | Doesn't support the BOOLEAN type. Judging from various JDBC documentation and a discussion at Ask Tom, it seems that Oracle recommends NUMBER(1) as the way to store boolean values; it's probably wise to constrain such columns to values 0 and 1 (and perhaps NULL). |
Informix | On my TODO. |
Warning to JDBC users:
According to the JDBC standard, getBoolean() must convert a SQL-'value' of NULL to the false Java value. To check if the database-value was really NULL, usewasNull().
The CHAR type
For the following section, I have used this test-SQL to try to illuminate differences (unfortunately, even standard SQL as simple as this has to be adjusted for some products):
Test steps:CREATE TABLE chartest (
charval1 CHAR(10) NOT NULL,
charval2 CHAR(10) NOT NULL,
varcharval VARCHAR(30) NOT NULL
);
INSERT INTO chartest VALUES ('aaa','aaa','aaa');
INSERT INTO chartest
VALUES ('aaaaaa ','aaa','aaa'); -- should truncate to 'aaaaaa '
INSERT INTO chartest
VALUES ('aaaaaaaaaaaa','aaa','aaa'); -- should raise error
SELECT * FROM chartest; -- should show two rows
DELETE FROM chartest WHERE charval1='aaaaaa';
SELECT * FROM chartest; -- should show one row
SELECT * FROM chartest WHERE charval1=varcharval;
SELECT charval1 || 'X' AS res FROM chartest;
SELECT CHAR_LENGTH(charval1 || charval2) AS res FROM chartest;
SELECT CHAR_LENGTH(charval1) + CHAR_LENGTH(charval2)
AS res
FROM chartest;
Expected results, after CREATE and INSERTs:
SELECT * FROM chartest; -- should show two rows CHARVAL1 CHARVAL2 VARCHARVAL ========== ========== ============================== aaa aaa aaa aaaaaa aaa aaa DELETE FROM chartest WHERE charval1='aaaaaa'; SELECT * FROM chartest; -- should show one row CHARVAL1 CHARVAL2 VARCHARVAL ========== ========== ============================== aaa aaa aaa SELECT * FROM chartest WHERE charval1=varcharval; CHARVAL1 CHARVAL2 VARCHARVAL ========== ========== ============================== aaa aaa aaa SELECT charval1 || 'X' FROM chartest AS res; res =========== aaa X SELECT CHAR_LENGTH(charval1 || charval2) AS res FROM chartest; res =========== 20 SELECT character_length(charval1) + character_length(charval2) AS res FROM chartest; res ============ 20
Standard |
|
PostgreSQL | Stores CHARs in space padded form, but violates the standard by (conceptually) truncating trailing white-space before performing most functions, operators, and comparisons (like the CHARACTER_LENGTH -function and the concatenation(|| ) operator).
|
DB2 | Follows the standard. |
MSSQL | Generally follows standard, but (conceptually) truncates trailing white-space before performing some functions (at least before LEN() ).
|
MySQL | Breaks the standard by silently inserting the string, truncated to specified column CHAR-length. (It's actually not completely silent, as it issues warnings if values were truncated: If you manually check for warnings, you will know that something bad happened, but not which of the rows are now invalid.) Violates the standard by effectively truncating all trailing spaces. The documentation states that MySQL truncates trailing spaces when CHAR values are retrieved. That may be true, but it seems that truncation even happens before the CHAR values are used as input in functions like CONCAT , CHAR_LENGTH , etc.
|
Oracle | Follows the standard, with a minor exception: Oracle doesn't remove trailing spaces which exceed the specified CHAR length, but raises an exception. |
Informix | On my TODO. |
Date and time
The TIMESTAMP type
Standard | Part of the Core requirements, feature ID F051-03. Stores year, month, day, hour, minute, second (with fractional seconds; default is 6 fractional digits). Extension to Core SQL (feature ID F411): TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE which also stores the time zone. Examples of TIMESTAMP literals:
Examples of TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE literals:
It's strange that TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE literals are not represented as, e.g., |
PostgreSQL | Follows that standard with one exception: In some cases, TIMESTAMP '2003-08-23 01:02:03 +02:00' is interpreted as a TIMESTAMP WITHOUT TIME ZONE (discarding the '+02:00 ' part)—not as a TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE value. The standard may be illogical regarding this, but a standard is a standard...
Performs good sanity checks on inserted timestamp values; e.g. this will work: |
DB2 | DB2 has the TIMESTAMP data type, but not the extended TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE type.
Performs good sanity checks on inserted timestamp values; e.g. this will work: |
MSSQL | Note that MSSQL's choice of words related to date and time is confusing: In MSSQL's vocabulary, datetime is a concrete data type, whereas in the SQL standard, datetime is a general term covering the DATE, TIME and TIMESTAMP types.
MSSQL has a strange pseudo-type called TIMESTAMP, but has deprecated it; don't use it in new code. The closest match to the SQL standard's TIMESTAMP type is DATETIME. This type stores the combination of date and time. It has a maximum of three fractional digits for seconds. Performs good sanity checks on inserted timestamp values; e.g. this will work: |
MySQL |
No matter what date/time data type chosen in MySQL, storage of fractional seconds and time zones are not supported (the TIME type accepts time literals with fractional seconds, but discards the fractional part when storing the value). You will have to invent your own systems for such information. Note also, that MySQL's choice of words related to date and time is confusing: In MySQL's vocabulary, datetimeis a concrete data type, whereas in the SQL standard, datetime is a general term covering the DATE, TIME and TIMESTAMP types. MySQL has a type called TIMESTAMP, but it is quite different from the standard TIMESTAMP: It's a 'magic' data type with side effects in that it's automatically updated to the current date and time if some criteria are fulfilled. MySQL has a type called DATETIME. Like MySQL's TIMESTAMP type, it stores a combination of date and time without fractional seconds. There are no side effects associated with the DATETIME type—which makes it the closest match to the SQL standard's TIMESTAMP type. By default, MySQL's sanity checks with regard to dates and time are (deliberately) poor. For example, MySQL accepts DATETIME values of '2003-02-29 00:05:00' and '2003-01-32 00:00:00'. Such values yield warnings (which you must check for if you want to be warned), but result in a value of zero being stored. |
Oracle | Follows the standard. Oracle has both the TIMESTAMP and the extended TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE types.
A special gotcha applies, though: Oracle forbids columns of type TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE as part of a unique key; this includes primary and foreign keys. Timestamps without time zone (and Oracle's special TIMESTAMP WITH LOCAL TIME ZONE) are accepted. Performs good sanity checks on inserted timestamp values; e.g. this will work: |
Informix | On my TODO. |
SQL functions
CHARACTER_LENGTH
Standard |
CHARACTER_LENGTH(argument) If the optional feature T061 is implemented, the function may be augmented with an indication of string unit: CHARACTER_LENGTH(argument USING string-unit ) string-unit may be UTF8 , UTF16 , UTF32 .
Returns NUMERIC. Returns NULL if the input is NULL. |
PostgreSQL | Follows the standard, providing CHARACTER_LENGTH (and CHAR_LENGTH ).
Note that PostgreSQL removes trailing (not leading) space from from CHAR values before counting. Note also that the behaviour of CHARACTER_LENGTH with regard to CHAR values has changed between versions 7.4 and 8.0 of PostgreSQL. |
DB2 | Has a CHARACTER_LENGTH function, but it's non-compliant because it requires indication of string unit, and db2's string units are different from the standard's.
Provides the Note that CHAR values are space-padded (like the standard says they should be), so the length of Documentation: CHARACTER_LENGTH and LENGTH |
MSSQL | Doesn't have CHARACTER_LENGTH. Provides the LEN and DATALENGTH functions instead (the latter is especially valid for 'special' data types like the TEXT type).Note that MSSQL's LEN -function removes trailing (not leading) spaces from CHAR values before counting; MSSQL'sDATALENGTH doesn't discard spaces.
Documentation: LEN and DATALENGTH |
MySQL | Provides CHARACTER_LENGTH. Aliases: CHAR_LENGTH, LENGTH. Note that MySQL removes trailing (not leading) spaces from CHAR values before counting. |
Oracle | Doesn't have CHARACTER_LENGTH. Provides the LENGTH function instead.
Behaves in strange ways if the input is the empty string or NULL, because of Oracles non-standard NULL handling (it considers NULL and the empty string identical 'values'). Note that CHAR values are space-padded (like the standard says they should be), so the length of |
Informix | On my TODO. |
SUBSTRING
Standard | The standard defines two variants of the SUBSTRING function:
|
PostgreSQL | PostgreSQL provides three SUBSTRING flavors:
|
DB2 | Provides (since version 9) the SUBSTRING function, but requires you to indicate string unit by appending "USINGunit ". The unit identifier may be CODEUNITS16 , CODEUNITS32 , or OCTETS . CODEUNITS16 /CODEUNITS32 seem non-standard. The standard's CHARACTERS unit isn't supported by DB2. Example: SELECT SUBSTRING(somecolumn FROM 3 USING OCTETS) FROM sometable SELECT SUBSTRING(somecolumn FROM 3 FOR 2 USING OCTETS) FROM sometable
For old DB2 versions, use the non-standard DB2 doesn't provide any built-in regular expression facilities at all (but you may manually add PCRE capabilities). |
MSSQL | MSSQL has a SUBSTRING function, but its syntax differs from that of the standard. The syntax is:
where start is an integer specifying the beginning of the string, and length is a non-negative integer indicating how many characters to return. MSSQL has no regular expression functionality. |
MySQL | MySQL supports the standard's ordinary SUBSTRING function, with some twists (see below). No regular expression based substring extraction is supported. MySQL breaks the standard when negative values are used as either start-position or length:
|
Oracle | Doesn't provide the standard SUBSTRING function. Provides SUBSTR(input,start-pos[,length]) instead (i.e. length is optional). Oracle provides a number of SUBSTR-variants (SUBSTRB, SUBSTRC, SUBSTR2, SUBSTR4, same syntax as for SUBSTR), mainly for handling various kinds of non-latin-only string-types. Oracle doesn't have support for string-extraction with the special SQL-style regular expressions. Instead, it has the REGEXP_SUBSTR function which offers string extraction, using POSIX-style regular expression pattern matching. Documentation: SUBSTR and REGEXP_SUBSTR. |
Informix | On my TODO. |
Note: If you find yourself using SUBSTRING in a WHERE-expression, then consider if LIKE could be used instead: The use of LIKE will typically make your DBMS try to use an index, whereas it will typically not try to do so in connection with functions.
REPLACE
REPLACE
means a string-function which searches a source string (haystack) for occurrences of a string to be replaced (needle) and replaces it with a new string (replacement).
Standard | Not mentioned. May be obtained through a combination of other functions (have a look at the OVERLAY, POSITION and CHARACTER_LENGTH functions). A de facto standard seems to have emerged with regard to REPLACE: REPLACE (haystack:string,needle:string,replacement:string) which means 'replace needle with replacement in the string haystack'. Replacement is done case-sensitivelyunless otherwise stated. The REPLACE function may be handy for correcting spelling errors (and other situations): UPDATE tablename
|
PostgreSQL | Follows de facto standard. Documentation |
DB2 | Follows de facto standard. Documentation |
MSSQL | Follows de facto standard with the exception that MSSQL by default works case insensitively. Documentation |
MySQL | Follows de facto standard. MySQL even works case sensitively.1 Note that the REPLACE -function is different from MySQL's non-standard REPLACE INTO expression. Documentation |
Oracle | Follows de facto standard. Documentation |
Informix | On my TODO. |
Note 1:
In this author's opinion, it's confusing that most (if not all) string-related functions in MySQL work case sensitively, while MySQL's default behaviour is to work case insensitively in plain WHERE-clauses involving string comparisons.
TRIM
LOCALTIMESTAMP
It's often important to get the value of current date and time. Below are the functions used to do that in the different implementations.
Concatenation
Constraint handling
The UNIQUE constraint
Standard | As the constraint name indicates, a (set of) column(s) with a UNIQUE constraint may only contain unique (combinations of) values.
A column—or a set of columns—which is subject to a UNIQUE constraint must also be subject to a not NULLconstraint, unless the DBMS implements an optional "NULLs allowed" feature (Feature ID 591). The optional feature adds some additional characteristics to the UNIQUE constraint:
|
PostgreSQL | Follows the standard, including the optional NULLs allowed feature. |
DB2 | Follows the non-optional parts of the UNIQUE-constraint. Doesn't implement the optional NULLs allowed feature.
Documentation (see the unique-constraint section of the page). |
MSSQL | Follows the standard—with a twist:
MSSQL offers the NULLs allowed feature, but allows at most one instance of a NULL-'value', if NULLs are allowed; i.e. breaks characteristic 2 in the above description of the standard. |
MySQL | Follows the standard, including the optional NULLs allowed feature. |
Oracle | Follows the standard—with a twist regarding multiple-column UNIQUE-constraints:
The optional NULLs allowed feature is implemented: If the UNIQUE-constraint is imposed on a single column, then the column may contain any number of NULLs (as expected from characteristic 2 in the above description of the standard). However, if the UNIQUE-constraint is specified for multiple columns, then Oracle sees the constraint as violated if any two rows
|
Informix | On my TODO. |
Mixture of type and operations
Automatic key generation
It's sometimes handy to have the DBMS handle generation of keys. The DBMSes offer various means for this. Note, however, that some database authorities warn against—at least some variants of—auto-generated keys; this is a classic database discourse.
Standard | The standard specifies a column attribute of: GENERATED ... AS IDENTITY (non-core feature ID T174+T175). When creating a table, an IDENTITY clause may be declared for certain types of columns (INTEGER being one):
or
The column with the IDENTITY attribute will be given values in increasing order, possibly with 'holes' (...,3,4,7,...). A base table may at most contain one column with the IDENTITY attribute. NOT NULL is implied for an IDENTITY column. Normally, a column declared with IDENTITY will also be declared PRIMARY KEY, but it's not implied. The examples differ in their 'ALWAYS' vs. 'BY DEFAULT' clauses:
The standard specifies several extended options which may be declared for a generated IDENTITY column. |
PostgreSQL | PostgreSQL doesn't support the standard's IDENTITY attribute.
PostgreSQL's best offering for a column with auto-generated values is to declare a column of 'type' SERIAL:
'SERIAL' is a short-hand for creating a sequence and using that sequence to create unique integers for a column. If the table is dropped, PostgreSQL will drop the sequence which was created as a side-effect of using the SERIAL type. As a user may manually insert or update a value in a column created as SERIAL, this comes closest to the standard's If you want semantics like the standard's
Another option is to add the |
DB2 | Follows standard, albeit with some restrictions on how identity columns may (not) be added to an existing table, etc.
Documentation: CREATE TABLE syntax and description of identity columns. |
MSSQL | MSSQL offers IDENTITY as a column property, but with a different syntax than the standard's specification. An example of creating a table with an IDENTITY column:
With MSSQL's IDENTITY attribute, the user cannot manually insert the value, unless the user has first run I.e., MSSQL's IDENTITY type is closest to the standard's Documentation: The IDENTITY property and SET IDENTITY_INSERT. |
MySQL | MySQL doesn't support the standard's IDENTITY attribute.
As an alternative, an integer column may be assigned the non-standard
Columns with the AUTO_INCREMENT attribute will—under certain conditions—automatically be assigned a value of <largest value in column>+<at least 1>. Look in MySQL's documentation for the (rather extensive) details. A table can have at most one column with the AUTO_INCREMENT attribute; that column must be indexed (it doesn'thave to be a primary key, as in the example SQL above) and cannot have a DEFAULT value attribute. It's probably not too far fetched to think of MySQL's AUTO_INCREMENT feature as this equivalence: The nice thing about this approach is that the automatic value insertion should never fail, even though some of the column's values might have been manually set—i.e. the combined advantages of the standard's The drawback is that it might result in more house-keeping: The system may need extra table locks when performing row updates/insertions to protect against ghost updates in concurrent transactions—thus slowing down the system in case of many concurrent updates/insertions. |
Oracle | Oracle doesn't support the standard's IDENTITY attribute.
If you want an auto-incrementing column in Oracle, then create a sequence and use that sequence in a trigger associated to the table. Example: For the table mytable, you want the mytable_id column to be of integer type, with an auto-incrementing values:
This will create an auto-incrementing column resembling the Note: If 'nice', incrementing values aren't important, you may use Oracle's SYS_GUID function as the default for a column; that way, universally unique identifiers will be assigned if you don't indicate a value for the column in new rows. Documentation: |
Informix | On my TODO. |
Note: IBM has a page comparing IDENTITY columns and sequences.
Bulk operations
TRUNCATE TABLE
Often, it's useful to be able to remove all rows from a large table in a quick way. And often, DELETE
isn't as quick as you'd like it to be. So several DBMSes implement a TRUNCATE
operation. Typically, truncating means that deletion isn't associated with triggers which may exist for the table, and typically, truncating involves little (if any) transaction log activity.
Standard | The SQL standard defines the TRUNCATE TABLE tablename statement (optional feature ID F200, new in SQL:2008) as:Delete all rows of a base table without causing any triggered action. Unfortunately, the standard doesn't specify
|
PostgreSQL | Follows the standard.
In PostgreSQL, See the documentation for variations and restrictions. Most importantly, you need to have be owner of the table to be truncated (or work as a superuser); alternatively, you need to have TRUNCATE privilege on the table. Note also the nice—but potentially dangerous— |
DB2 | Almost follows the standard.(since version 9.7) DB2 requires that the IMMEDIATE keyword be added the the ordinary TRUNCATE TABLE statement, e.g.: TRUNCATE TABLE someschema.sometable IMMEDIATE TRUNCATE TABLE must be the first statement in a transaction. A transaction starting with TRUNCATE TABLE may include other statements, but if the transaction is rolled back, the TRUNCATE TABLE operation is not undone. DB2s TRUNCATE TABLE operation has a number of optional arguments, see the documentation for more on this; especially, the REUSE STORAGE argument may be important for ad-hoc DBA tasks.
In DB2 versions < 9.7, you may abuse the
The Documentation: |
MSSQL | Follows the standard.
In MSSQL, You need to have at least ALTER-permission on the table to be truncated. |
MySQL | MySQL has a TRUNCATE TABLE statement, but it doesn't always follow the standard.
Note that in some cases, MySQL's truncate command is really the equivalent of an unrestricted DELETE command (i.e.: potentially slow and trigger-invoking). Its behaviour depends on which storage engine the table is managed by. When using InnoDB (transaction safe) tables, |
Oracle | Follows the standard.
Note, that the You may find that Needed privileges—Quoting from the documentation: |
Informix | On my TODO. |
Command line procedures / metadata
The following are not necessarily SQL operations, but rather a description of how different operations are performed in the command line interface provided by each product.
The shape of the command line interfaces in the commercial products is depressing. Vendors, please do something about it: Not all database developers like to use slow GUIs for technical stuff. And sometimes, DBMS work is performed over slow Internet lines which makes a decent command line interface vital.
Fortunately, a tool like HenPlus exists. It can be a pain to install, but once working, it's nice to work with.
Starting the command line interface
Standard | Not defined. |
PostgreSQL | Run:psql which should be in the PATH in any sensible installation. PostgreSQL's command line interface is very user friendly. It has command history (press arrow-up for previous commands) and a fairly well-working command completion feature. |
DB2 | Run:db2 -t (The -t argument tells the command line processor to a semicolon as statement terminator instead of the default (newline). This allows for multi-line SQL statements.)
The The 'utility' doesn't seem to have anything resembling useful command history or command completion. Fortunately, queries may be sent to the DB2 also has a 'utility' called |
MSSQL | The command line interface is started by runningsqlcmd
In MSSQL 2000, the command line interface was started by running An alternative to osql—apart from HenPlus, mentioned above—is SQSH which should work on any modern open source operating system, except it doesn't seem to support Kerberos, so you need to log into the database using a database-account (not a Windows-account). |
MySQL | Run:mysql
If you need help on the optional command line options, see the man page. On platforms like Linux and FreeBSD (which have decent readline-capabilities), MySQL's command line interface is simply great; not much else to say. MySQL's command line interface is said to be rather poor on Windows, though. |
Oracle | Run:sqlplus
A unique feature of Oracle is that a web-based administration interface is provided, as a supplement to the local administration software. The URL to the interface is typically |
Informix | Informix' command line utility is called dbaccess . If run without arguments, it starts a menu system. If you simply want to shoot SQL statements off to the database, another form is more convenient, at least on unix: echo 'SELECT foo FROM bar' | dbaccess databasename
|
Getting a list of databases
Standard | Not specified, as far as I know. (By the way: The SQL standard doesn't have the concept of a database as a container of schemas; instead, the standard specifies that schemas are contained in a catalog.) |
PostgreSQL | Using SQL: SELECT datname FROM pg_catalog.pg_database
When working in the Alternative (when working from the terminal, not in Documentation: The psql tool, the pg_database catalog. |
DB2 | Offers the LIST DATABASE DIRECTORY command, but only when working in the db2 command line processor (i.e. not when working from db2batch ); this command's output is human readable, but sub-optimal as machine readable format.
|
MSSQL |
EXEC SP_HELPDB
|
MySQL |
SHOW DATABASES
|
Oracle | In Oracle, there is a one-to-one relationship between databases and instances (unless you work with a clustered Oracle system). You can get a list of instances; the way to do it depends on the operating system which Oracle is running on:
Documentation: oratab |
Informix | Connect to the sysmaster database (all users are allowed to do this) and run: SELECT name FROM sysmaster:sysdatabases
|
Getting a list of schemas
Getting a list of tables
Standard | Part 11 of the SQL standard specifies the INFORMATION_SCHEMA schema which must be part of all database catalogues. The schema may be used like this:
or (often more relevant):
See a warning about potential case sensitivity problems below. |
PostgreSQL | Follows the standard, except for some gotchas mentioned below.
In command-line context, it's easier to use the following non-SQL command instead of querying the INFORMATION_SCHEMA: Documentation: The |
DB2 | Doesn't provide the standard INFORMATION_SCHEMA . Instead, DB2 offers the SYSCAT schema (catalog) which is somewhat compatible.
Offers what is probably a shorthand to some system catalog query: |
MSSQL | Follows that standard. Sometimes, the SP_TABLES system stored procedure is easier to use.
Documentation:
|
MySQL | Follows the standard, except that MySQL doesn't support schemas, so one might say that MySQL's INFORMATION_SCHEMA is really an 'INFORMATION_DATABASE' or 'INFORMATION_CATALOGUE'.
In command-line context, it's easier to use the following non-standard SQL: Documentation: |
Oracle | Doesn't provide the standard INFORMATION_SCHEMA. Provides a data dictionary system instead.
The quickest way to get a usable list of 'normal' tables in the current schema: |
Informix | Doesn't provide the standard INFORMATION_SCHEMA out of the box. A few of the standard's INFORMATION_SCHEMA views may be added by running a special script, though.
Informix offers a set of system catalogs instead. To get a list of tables: The above query will include views and other objects; if you want base tables only: |
Warning about a general case sensitivity gotcha
Note that there may be case sensitivity issues involved when using meta-data views like those in the INFORMATION_SCHEMA. Generally, the standard states that the name of an identifier (such as table names) are implicitly converted to uppercase, unless double-quotes are used when referring to the identifier. The same goes for identifiers used in queries: A query like SELECT foo FROM tablename
is implicitly converted to SELECT FOO FROM TABLENAME
.
If you create your table as CREATE TABLE testtab (id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY)
then a query like SELECT * FROM testtab
should work fine, and SELECT * FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.TABLES WHERE TABLE_NAME='TESTTAB'
should work, while the following query will probably fail: SELECT * FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.TABLES WHERE TABLE_NAME='testtab'
Warning about INFORMATION_SCHEMA gotchas in PostgreSQL
Warning: PostgreSQL's case-conversion rules for unquoted identifiers (such as table names) are non-standard: PostgreSQL converts the identifiers to lower case, instead of converting to upper case. This means that you may try altering the case of identifier names used for queries in the INFORMATION_SCHEMA if you experience unexpected, empty metadata queries.
Note also that due to PostgreSQL's handling of constraint names, the INFORMATION_SCHEMA cannot safely be used to deduce referential constraints; for this, you have to use PostgreSQL's pg_catalog system-schema.
Getting a table description
Standard | Part 11 of the SQL standard specifies the INFORMATION_SCHEMA schema which must be part of all database catalogues. The schema may be used like this:
—or like this (more verbose):
To get information about constraints, involved columns and (possibly) referenced columns, a query like this may be used: If you don't care about potential namespace conflicts, you may leave out the lines commented with " See also: Warning about potential case sensitivity problems above. |
PostgreSQL | Follows the standard, except for some gotchas mentioned above.
In command-line context it's easier to use this non-SQL command: |
DB2 | Doesn't provide the standard INFORMATION_SCHEMA.
To obtain (very) basic information about a table: To get information about constraints, including involved/referred columns, a query like the following may be used, although the Documentation:
|
MSSQL | Follows the standard, except that
Often, the Documentation: |
MySQL | Follows the standard, except that
In command-line context it's easier to use this non-SQL command: Documentation: |
Oracle | Doesn't provide the standard INFORMATION_SCHEMA. Offers data dictionary views instead.
To get (very) basic information: To get information on constraints, including foreign (referred) table/column information, a query like this may be used (adjust tablename in one of the last lines): To get information on indexes on a table, a query like this may be used (adjust tablename in one of the last lines): Documentation:
|
Informix | Doesn't provide the standard INFORMATION_SCHEMA out of the box. If a special script is run, an INFORMATION_SCHEMA may be added which allows for using the most basic standards-based table description query.
In practice, an Informix-only query is used. The following query provides very basic table information, excluding constraints: Notice that the table name is in lower case. The colname values are numeric codes which need to be looked up in order to provide meaning. |
Manually telling the DBMS to collect statistics
In most DBMSes, it's possible to enable automatic statistics gathering, but sometimes, it's nice to be able to manually tell the DBMS to gather statistics for a table (or a number of tables).
Standard | Not standardized. |
PostgreSQL |
ANALYZE tablename
If the tablename parameter is left out, then statistics are gathered for all tables in the current database. |
DB2 |
RUNSTATS ON TABLE schema-name.table-name AND INDEXES ALL (many variations/options available) The Documentation: |
MSSQL | First, you have to add statistics to the table: CREATE STATISTICS stats_name (The CREATE STATISTICS step is not needed for indexed columns. Thus, this step may be skipped if you are satisfied with keeping statistics on indexed columns only.)
The statistics may then be updated when needed: Having to explicitly mention tables and columns can be tedious, and in many cases, the Documentation: CREATE STATISTICS, UPDATE STATISTICS, sp_createstats, sp_updatestats |
MySQL |
ANALYZE TABLE tablename
|
Oracle | Oracle offers to estimate (quick) or compute (thorough) statistics for a database object. The quick way to do this is to use the deprecated ANALYZE command which can be used in various ways, e.g.
—Or: If you want to stay away from deprecated features (although I doubt that Oracle will remove ANALYZE...STATISTICS... any time soon), you need to use the DBMS_STATS package. |
Informix | On my TODO. |
Getting a query explanation
Standard | Not standardized. |
PostgreSQL |
EXPLAIN <query>
|
DB2 | The easiest way to get a query explanation is to save the query in a file (without a terminating semicolon), and then run a special command-line utility:db2expln -database databasename -stmtfile query.sql -terminator ';' -terminal In the above example, the query has been saved to a file called "query.sql". In some situations, you may want to use the If you prefer to get the explanation through SQL:
|
MSSQL | MSSQL can be put in a query explanation mode where queries are not actually executed, but a query explanation is returned instead:SET SHOWPLAN_TEXT ON
The query explanation mode is turned off by running |
MySQL |
EXPLAIN <query>
|
Oracle |
EXPLAIN PLAN FOR <query> After the query has run, do the following to get the plan explanation: SELECT plan_table_output FROM table(dbms_xplan.display())
|
Informix | On my TODO. |
Turning on query timing
JDBC
JDBC driver jar file name, and general documentation
PostgreSQL | The PostgreSQL JDBC Driver: postgresql-postgresqlversion-jdbcbuild#.jdbc4.jar |
DB2 | IBM Data Server Driver for JDBC: db2jcc.jar (included in default DB2 client software installations; may also be downloaded separately, after registration) |
MSSQL |
Microsoft's driver: sqljdbc.jar Alternative: The open source JTDS driver: jtds-version.jar Documentation: |
MySQL | The MySQL Connector/J driver: mysql-connector-java-version-bin.jar |
Oracle | Oracle's JDBC drivers: ojdbc5.jar (for Java 5), ojdbc6.jar (for Java 6) |
Informix | IBM's Informix JDBC driver: ifxjdbc.jar (download requires registration and filling out annoying questionnaires, and an installer which only works with some JREs has to be run to unpack the driver) |
JDBC driver class name
JDBC connection URL
Other topics
Dummy table use
Some DBMSes let you perform a query like this:
SELECT 1+1
answering
2
With other DBMSes, you need to insert a dummy-table expression to obtain the same result:
SELECT 1+1 FROM dummy-table
Obtaining DBMS version
Standard | SELECT CHARACTER_VALUE |
PostgreSQL | Follows the standard. An alternative, non-standard function may be used: SELECT VERSION()
|
DB2 |
SELECT service_level FROM SYSIBMADM.ENV_INST_INFO
—or run the special Documentation: |
MSSQL | MSSQL's implementation of the IMPLEMENTATION_SCHEMA doesn't seem to include the SQL_IMPLEMENTATION_INFO view. In stead, you may useSELECT SERVERPROPERTY('ProductVersion') (just the version), or SELECT @@VERSION (verbose, harder to parse). Documentation: SERVERPROPERTY, @@VERSION |
MySQL | MySQL's INFORMATION_SCHEMA doesn't include the SQL_IMPLEMENTATION_INFO view.
Work-around: |
Oracle |
SELECT banner FROM v$version
|
Informix | Using SQL: SELECT dbinfo('version','full') FROM systables WHERE tabid=1
From the command line: Documentation:
|
Standard TCP/IP port
Standard | Not specified | ||
PostgreSQL | 5432 | For security reasons, PostgreSQL doesn't listen to non-local TCP interfaces by default. | Documentation |
DB2 | 50000 | ||
MSSQL | 1433 | By default, MSSQL Express Edition doesn't listen for TCP connections. | |
MySQL | 3306 | ||
Oracle | 1521 | Documentation | |
Informix | 9088 (unencrypted) | Informix versions prior to version 11, the default port was 1526. |
Diagnostic log
Each DBMS has different ways to record diagnostic information (event logs).
Related work
- Mimer Information Technology AB (makers of the Mimer SQL DBMS) has an interesting feature comparison chart, displaying what SQL:1999 features are implemented in different commercial products. May be biased because it's created by a DBMS vendor.
Mimer also has lists of reserved words. - Wikipedia has a Comparison of relational database management systems page. And a Wikibook called SQL dialects reference is in the works.
- Chris Fehily's SQL: Visual QuickStart Guide teaches SQL by first describing the standards-based (SQL:2003) approach, and then how to adjust to the real World, using MS Access, MSSQL, Oracle, MySQL, PostgreSQL, and DB2. (Full disclosure note: I was technical editor on second edition of the book.)
- Alessandro Tanasi: Database datatype comparison sheet.
- Peter Gulutzan (who works for MySQL AB) has written several articles related to the subject. He has also written two related books:
- SQL-99 Complete, Really (co-authored with Trudy Pelzer) is said to be good.
- SQL Performance Tuning (also co-authored with Trudy Pelzer), mentions quite a few cross-product SQL issues (primarily related to performance, of course).
-
Some DBMS evaluations performed at the Astrogrid Virtual Observatory (focus on spatial functionality):
- Various comparisons of MySQL, PostgreSQL and DB2.
- Comparison of availability and names of mathematical functions in major DBMS products.
- Autumn '03: Comparison of DB2, MySQL, and Postgres, comparing ease of use, scalability and performance of two types of spatial joins.
- Autumn '02: Comparison of PostgreSQL, MySQL, Oracle, SQL Server and DB2.
- Oracle / SQL Server / DB2 / Mckoi / MySQL Database Equivalents.
- Uday Parmar: Open Source Database Feature Comparison Matrix.
Note: Created by employees of a database vendor. - SQLite:
- Survey of NULL-handling: NULL Handling in SQLite Versus Other Database Engines.
- SQL Features That SQLite Does Not Implement
- Bowman/Emerson/Darnovsky's The Practical SQL Handbook—Using SQL Variants is OK for this subject, although it is rather out-dated and (worse) doesn't include any guidance on working with open source DBMSs.
- Kevin E. Kline's SQL in a Nutshell from O'Reilly is a good reference. O'Reilly has also published Jonathan Gennick's SQL Pocket Guide which looks good (but I haven't read it).
- The Analysis and Solutions Company:
- Building Truly Portable Database Applications in PHP includes advice on DBMS differences (some of the presentation is PHP-specific, as the title indicates).
- Database Portability: Date and Timestamp Columns.
- Jutta Horstmann OSDBmigration.
- Lewis Cunningham: A comparison of data types between various databases - Oracle, MySQL, DB2, Ingres, SQL Server, Firebird, Postgres.
- Bristle Software SQL Tips contains tips with variants for several DBMSes.
- ConnStr.net: .Net/ODBC connection strings to all sorts of database systems.
- See also my DBMS links.
Acknowledgments
The following people have provided comments, suggestions and/or fixes, resulting in content changes on this page:
- Ian Barwick
- Chester Kustarz
- Bruno Wolff III
- Carsten Pedersen
- Jürgen Auer
- Edi Stocker
- Tzvetan Tzankov
- Jess Robinson
- Gordon P. Hemsley
- Philip Nelson
- Andreas Plesner Jacobsen
- Clive Page
- Holger Jakobs
- Dennis Björklund
- Chris Fehily
- Alf-Ivar Holm
- Joseph Fuda
- J M Sykes
- Greg Sabino Mullane
- Jari Aalto
- Robert Jones
- Greg Fortune
- Dick Leone
- Neil Conway
- Markus Schaber
- James Denny
- Neal Lindsay
- David Rowley
- Erik Berglund
- Michael Swart
- Radosław Zieliński
- Jonathan Giroux
- Thomas Kellerer
- Guillaume Taglang
- Claus Samuelsen
- David Fetter
- Mike Wilson
- James Beckett
- Joachim Selke
- Radim Kolar
- Stewart Ashton
(In chronological order.)
相关推荐
`MS_SQL_SELECT.html`文件可能包含关于MSSQL SELECT语句的详细比较,而`Comparison of different SQL implementations.html`可能对比了不同SQL实现的特性。 标签中的“tsql”代表Transact-SQL,这是MSSQL的SQL方言...
### 字典实现的不同算法对比分析 #### 引言 在计算机科学领域中,映射(Mapping)的概念极为常见。映射是一种将一个集合中的元素与另一个集合中的元素相对应的函数。例如,假设存在两个集合A和B,映射f:A→B表示...
C++ 字符串实现比较 在 C++ 编程语言中,字符串实现是非常重要的一部分。本文将比较 STL 字符串、copy-on-write 算法和非 copy-on-write 算法在性能方面的差异,并且讨论 GNU libstdc++ 和 STLport 实现的字符串...
The goal of this paper is to provide an experimental comparison of the efficiency of min-cut/max flow algorithms for applications in vision. We compare the running times of several standard ...
标题中的"A Comparison of Clinical Follow-Up of Different Total"指的是对不同全颞下颌关节置换假体临床追踪比较的研究。描述进一步细化为"Total Temporomandibular Joint Replacement Prostheses_ A Systematic ...
这篇论文《Performance comparison among popular implementations of H.264 encoders》由H Y El-Arsh等人撰写,发表在《IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering》上,主要进行了H.264编码器不同...
根据提供的文件信息,本文的知识点包括如下几个方面: 1. 电荷对定量构效关系(QSAR)研究的影响:在定量构效关系研究中,电荷的正确分配是至关重要的步骤。电荷分布的准确性直接影响到模型的预测精度和可靠性。...
### DB2与Oracle数据库对比分析 #### 引言:为何选择IBM DB2? 随着全球数字化进程的加速,企业面临着前所未有的数据处理挑战。为了更好地利用信息技术(IT),许多组织正在寻求更智能、更高效的解决方案来应对日益...
详细的介绍多目标有化算法以及相应的测试函数,以及对比各种多目标优化算法(Comparison of Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms: Empirical Results)
### 非线性滤波器对比分析:扩展卡尔曼滤波器(EKF)、无迹卡尔曼滤波器(UKF)与粒子滤波器(PF) #### 概述 本文探讨了非线性滤波器在追踪再入大气层的弹道目标时的应用与性能比较。该研究聚焦于三个主要的非...
本文是一篇由K. Mikolajczyk等来自不同研究机构的学者合作撰写的学术论文,旨在对仿射不变区域检测器(affine region detectors)进行评估和比较。论文的主要内容包括对六种不同的区域检测器在不同成像条件下的性能...
software Blender, if they supported the required features and if they appeared to have some form of complete specification. The formats were then evaluated by looking at the available specification。
本文对比分析了几代视频编码标准的压缩能力,重点关注了高效率视频编码(HEVC)技术。文章利用峰值信噪比(PSNR)和主观测试结果来对比不同视频编码标准的设计,包括H.262/MPEG-2视频、H.263、MPEG-4视觉、H.264/...
### 视频编码标准的编码效率比较 #### 引言 本文主要探讨了视频编码标准在编码效率方面的表现。编码效率是指在达到特定视频质量水平时所需的比特率最小化的能力,或者反过来讲,在给定比特率下所能实现的最大视频...
### VHDL、Verilog与SystemVerilog的对比分析 #### 引言 随着硬件描述语言(HDL)的各种增强功能在过去几年中不断增多,选择最适合特定设计的语言也变得越来越复杂。许多设计师和组织正在考虑是否应该从一种HDL转向...
System planning for direct-sampling receivers is reviewed, highlighting dBFS/Hz as an intrinsic measure of dynamic range, independent of channel and Nyquist bandwidths. Power dissipation versus ...
Digital Change Detection by Post-Classification Comparison of RS Data in Land Use of Guangzhou,樊风雷,Wang Yunpeng,Remote sensing has long time been an important component of regional planning for ...
### 网络模拟器性能比较研究 #### 引言 网络模拟作为一种广泛采用的方法论,在通信系统工程领域中占据着举足轻重的地位。它主要用于新型通信架构及网络协议的发展与评估。通过网络模拟器,研究者可以构建任意...
Comparison of fast discrete wavelet transform algorithms