- 浏览: 83064 次
- 性别:
- 来自: 深圳
文章分类
最新评论
-
haoruijun0068:
去这里看看吧 收集素材更方便 http://www.sucai ...
前端素材 -
w善解人衣w:
很好,总结了素数的算法以及时间复杂度。笑纳了!
求素数 -
木南飘香:
...
2011.6、7月学习计划 -
parabellum_sky:
马上看 V字仇杀队 这部电影了。
发人深省的电影台词
转载:http://theamiableapi.com/2012/01/16/java-api-design-checklist/
There are many different rules and tradeoffs to consider during Java API design. Like any complex task, it tests the limits of our attention and memory. Similar to the pilots’ pre-flight checklist, this list helps software designers remember obvious and not so obvious rules while designing Java APIs. It is a complement to and intended to be used together with the API Design Guidelines .
This list uses the following conventions: (Do) verb... - Indicates the required design Favor... - Indicates the best of several design alternatives Consider... - Indicates a possible design improvement Avoid... - Indicates a design weakness Do not... - Indicates a design mistake
1. Package Design Checklist
1.1. General
- 1.1.1. Favor placing API and implementation into separate packages
- 1.1.2. Favor placing APIs into high-level packages and implementation into lower-level packages
- 1.1.3. Consider breaking up large APIs into several packages
- 1.1.4. Consider putting API and implementation packages into separate Java archives
- 1.1.5. Avoid (minimize) internal dependencies on implementation classes in APIs
- 1.1.6. Avoid unnecessary API fragmentation
- 1.1.7. Do not place public implementation classes in the API package
- 1.1.8. Do not create dependencies between callers and implementation classes
- 1.1.9. Do not place unrelated APIs into the same package
- 1.1.10. Do not place API and SPI into the same package
- 1.1.11. Do not move or rename the package of an already released public API
1.2. Naming
- 1.2.1. Start package names with the company’s official root namespace
- 1.2.2. Use a stable product or product family name at the second level of the package name
- 1.2.3. Use the name of the API as the final part of the package name
- 1.2.4. Consider marking implementation-only packages by including “internal” in the package name
- 1.2.5. Avoid composite names
- 1.2.6. Avoid using the same name for both package and class inside the package
- 1.2.7. Avoid using “api” in package names
- 1.2.8. Do not use marketing, project, organizational unit or geographic location names
- 1.2.9. Do not use uppercase characters in package names
1.3. Documentation
- 1.3.1. Provide a package overview (package.html) for each package
- 1.3.2. Follow standard Javadoc conventions
- 1.3.3. Begin with a short, one sentence summary of the API
- 1.3.4. Provide enough details to help deciding if and how to use the API
- 1.3.5. Indicate the entry points (main classes or methods) of the API
- 1.3.6. Include sample code for the main, most fundamental use case
- 1.3.7. Include a link to the Developer Guide
- 1.3.8. Include a link to the Cookbook
- 1.3.9. Indicate related APIs
- 1.3.10. Include the API version number
- 1.3.11. Indicate deprecated API versions with the @deprecated tag
- 1.3.12. Consider including a copyright notice
- 1.3.13. Avoid lengthy package overviews
- 1.3.14. Do not include implementation packages into published Javadoc
2. Type Design Checklist
2.1. General
- 2.1.1. Ensure each type has a single, well-defined purpose
- 2.1.2. Ensure types represent domain concepts, not design abstractions
- 2.1.3. Limit the number of types
- 2.1.4. Limit the size of types
- 2.1.5. Follow consistent design patterns when designing related types
- 2.1.6. Favor multiple (private) implementations over multiple public types
- 2.1.7. Favor interfaces over class inheritance for expressing simple commonality in behavior
- 2.1.8. Favor abstract classes over interfaces for decoupling API from implementation
- 2.1.9. Favor enumeration types over constants
- 2.1.10. Consider generic types
- 2.1.11. Consider placing constraints on the generic type parameter
- 2.1.12. Consider using interfaces to achieve similar effect to multiple inheritance
- 2.1.13. Avoid designing for client extension
- 2.1.14. Avoid deep inheritance hierarchies
- 2.1.15. Do not use public nested types
- 2.1.16. Do not declare public or protected fields
- 2.1.17. Do not expose implementation inheritance to the client
2.2. Naming
- 2.2.1. Use a noun or a noun phrase
- 2.2.2. Use PascalCasing
- 2.2.3. Capitalize only the first letter of acronyms
- 2.2.4. Use accurate names for purpose of the type
- 2.2.5. Reserve the shortest, most memorable name for the most frequently used type
- 2.2.6. End the name of all exceptions with the word “Exception”
- 2.2.7. Use singular nouns (Color, not Colors) for naming enumerated types
- 2.2.8. Consider longer names
- 2.2.9. Consider ending the name of derived class with the name of the base class
- 2.2.10. Consider starting the name of an abstract class with the word “Abstract”
- 2.2.11. Avoid abbreviations
- 2.2.12. Avoid generic nouns
- 2.2.13. Avoid synonyms
- 2.2.14. Avoid type names used in related APIs
- 2.2.15. Do not use names which differ in case alone
- 2.2.16. Do not use prefixes
- 2.2.17. Do not prefix interface names with “I”
- 2.2.18. Do not use types names used in Java core packages
2.3. Classes
- 2.3.1. Minimize implementation dependencies
- 2.3.2. List public methods first
- 2.3.3. Declare implementation methods private
- 2.3.4. Define at least one public concrete class which extends a public abstract class
- 2.3.5. Provide adequate defaults for the basic usage scenarios
- 2.3.6. Design classes with strong invariants
- 2.3.7. Group stateless, accessor and mutator methods together
- 2.3.8. Keep the number of mutator methods at a minimum
- 2.3.9. Consider providing a default no-parameter constructor
- 2.3.10. Consider overriding equals(), hashCode() and toString()
- 2.3.11. Consider implementing Comparable
- 2.3.12. Consider implementing Serializable
- 2.3.13. Consider making classes re-entrant
- 2.3.14. Consider declaring the class as final
- 2.3.15. Consider preventing class instantiation by not providing a public constructor
- 2.3.16. Consider using custom types to enforce strong preconditions as class invariants
- 2.3.17. Consider designing immutable classes
- 2.3.18. Avoid static classes
- 2.3.19. Avoid using Cloneable
- 2.3.20. Do not add instance members to static classes
- 2.3.21. Do not define public constructors for public abstract classes clients should not extend
- 2.3.22. Do not require extensive initialization
2.4. Interfaces
- 2.4.1. Provide at least one implementing class for every public interface
- 2.4.2. Provide at least one consuming method for every public interface
- 2.4.3. Do not add methods to a released public Java interface
- 2.4.4. Do not use marker interfaces
- 2.4.5. Do not use public interfaces as a container for constant fields
2.5. Enumerations
- 2.5.1. Consider specifying a zero-value (“None” or “Unspecified”, etc) for enumeration types
- 2.5.2. Avoid enumeration types with only one value
- 2.5.3. Do not use enumeration types for open-ended sets of values
- 2.5.4. Do not reserve enumeration values for future use
- 2.5.5. Do not add new values to a released enumeration
2.6. Exceptions
- 2.6.1. Ensure that custom exceptions are serialized correctly
- 2.6.2. Consider defining a different exception class for each error type
- 2.6.3. Consider providing extra information for programmatic access
- 2.6.4. Avoid deep exception hierarchies
- 2.6.5. Do not derive custom exceptions from other than Exception and RuntimeException
- 2.6.6. Do not derive custom exceptions directly from Throwable
- 2.6.7. Do not include sensitive information in error messages
2.7. Documentation
- 2.7.1. Provide type overview for each type
- 2.7.2. Follow standard Javadoc conventions
- 2.7.3. Begin with a short, one sentence summary of the type
- 2.7.4. Provide enough details to help deciding if and how to use the type
- 2.7.5. Explain how to instantiate the type
- 2.7.6. Provide code sample to illustrate the main use case for the type
- 2.7.7. Include links to relevant sections in the Developer Guide
- 2.7.8. Include links to relevant sections in the Cookbook
- 2.7.9. Indicate related types
- 2.7.10. Indicate deprecated types using the @deprecated tag
- 2.7.11. Document class invariants
- 2.7.12. Avoid lengthy type overviews
- 2.7.13. Do not generate Javadoc for private fields and methods
3. Method Design Checklist
3.1. General
- 3.1.1. Make sure each method does only one thing
- 3.1.2. Ensure related methods are at the same level of granularity
- 3.1.3. Ensure no boilerplate code is needed to combine method calls
- 3.1.4. Make all method calls atomic
- 3.1.5. Design protected methods with the same care as public methods
- 3.1.6. Limit the number of mutator methods
- 3.1.7. Design mutators with strong invariants
- 3.1.8. Favor generic methods over a set of overloaded methods
- 3.1.9. Consider generic methods
- 3.1.10. Consider method pairs, where the effect of one is reversed by the other
- 3.1.11. Avoid “helper” methods
- 3.1.12. Avoid long-running methods
- 3.1.13. Avoid forcing callers to write loops for basic scenarios
- 3.1.14. Avoid “option” parameters to modify behavior
- 3.1.15. Avoid non-reentrant methods
- 3.1.16. Do not remove a released method
- 3.1.17. Do not deprecate a released method without providing a replacement
- 3.1.18. Do not change the signature of a released method
- 3.1.19. Do not change the observable behavior of a released method
- 3.1.20. Do not strengthen the precondition of an already released API method
- 3.1.21. Do not weaken the postcondition of an already released API method
- 3.1.22. Do not add new methods to released interfaces
- 3.1.23. Do not add a new overload to a released API
3.2. Naming
- 3.2.1. Begin names with powerful, expressive verbs
- 3.2.2. Use camelCasing
- 3.2.3. Reserve “get”, “set” and “is” for JavaBeans methods accessing local fields
- 3.2.4. Use words familiar to callers
- 3.2.5. Stay close to spoken English
- 3.2.6. Avoid abbreviations
- 3.2.7. Avoid generic verbs
- 3.2.8. Avoid synonyms
- 3.2.9. Do not use underscores
- 3.2.10. Do not rely on parameter names or types to clarify the meaning of the method
3.3. Parameters
- 3.3.1. Choose the most precise type for parameters
- 3.3.2. Keep the meaning of the null parameter value consistent across related method calls
- 3.3.3. Use consistent parameter names, types and ordering in related methods
- 3.3.4. Place output parameters after the input parameters in the parameter list
- 3.3.5. Provide overloaded methods with shorter parameter lists for frequently used default parameter values
- 3.3.6. Use overloaded methods for operations with the same semantics on unrelated types
- 3.3.7. Favor interfaces over concrete classes as parameters
- 3.3.8. Favor collections over arrays as parameters and return values
- 3.3.9. Favor generic collections over raw (untyped) collections
- 3.3.10. Favor enumeration types over Boolean or integer types
- 3.3.11. Favor putting single object parameters ahead of collection or array parameters
- 3.3.12. Favor putting custom type parameters ahead of standard Java type parameters
- 3.3.13. Favor putting object parameters ahead of value parameters
- 3.3.14. Favor interfaces over concrete classes as return types
- 3.3.15. Favor empty collections to null return values
- 3.3.16. Favor returning values which are valid input for related methods
- 3.3.17. Consider making defensive copies of mutable parameters
- 3.3.18. Consider storing weak object references internally
- 3.3.19. Avoid variable length parameter lists
- 3.3.20. Avoid long parameter lists (more than 3)
- 3.3.21. Avoid putting parameters of the same type next to each other
- 3.3.22. Avoid out or in-out method parameters
- 3.3.23. Avoid method overloading
- 3.3.24. Avoid parameter types exposing implementation details
- 3.3.25. Avoid Boolean parameters
- 3.3.26. Avoid returning null
- 3.3.27. Avoid return types defined in unrelated APIs, except core Java APIs
- 3.3.28. Avoid returning references to mutable internal objects
- 3.3.29. Do not use integer parameters for passing predefined constant values
- 3.3.30. Do not reserve parameters for future use
- 3.3.31. Do not change the parameter naming or ordering in overloaded methods
3.4. Error handling
- 3.4.1. Throw exception only for exceptional circumstances
- 3.4.2. Throw checked exceptions only for recoverable errors
- 3.4.3. Throw runtime exceptions to signal API usage mistakes
- 3.4.4. Throw exceptions at the appropriate level of abstraction
- 3.4.5. Perform runtime precondition checks
- 3.4.6. Throw NullPointerException to indicate a prohibited null parameter value
- 3.4.7. Throw IllegalArgumentException to indicate an incorrect parameter value other than null
- 3.4.8. Throw IllegalStateException to indicate a method call made in the wrong context
- 3.4.9. Indicate in the error message which parameter violated which precondition
- 3.4.10. Ensure failed method calls have no side effects
- 3.4.11. Provide runtime checks for prohibited API calls made inside callback methods
- 3.4.12. Favor standard Java exceptions over custom exceptions
- 3.4.13. Favor query methods over exceptions for predictable error conditions
3.5. Overriding
- 3.5.1. Use the @Override annotation
- 3.5.2. Preserve or weaken preconditions
- 3.5.3. Preserve or strengthen postconditions
- 3.5.4. Preserve or strengthen the invariant
- 3.5.5. Do not throw new types of runtime exceptions
- 3.5.6. Do not change the type (stateless, accessor or mutator) of the method
3.6. Constructors
- 3.6.1. Minimize the work done in constructors
- 3.6.2. Set the value of all properties to reasonable defaults
- 3.6.3. Use constructor parameters only as a shortcut for setting properties
- 3.6.4. Validate constructor parameters
- 3.6.5. Name constructor parameters the same as corresponding properties
- 3.6.6. Follow the guidelines for method overloading when providing multiple constructors
- 3.6.7. Favor constructors over static factory methods
- 3.6.8. Consider a no parameter default constructor
- 3.6.9. Consider a static factory method if you don’t always need a new instance
- 3.6.10. Consider a static factory method if you need to decide the precise type of object at runtime
- 3.6.11. Consider a static factory method if you need to access external resources
- 3.6.12. Consider a builder when faced with many constructor parameters
- 3.6.13. Consider private constructors to prevent direct class instantiation
- 3.6.14. Avoid creating unnecessary objects
- 3.6.15. Avoid finalizers
- 3.6.16. Do not throw exceptions from default (no-parameter) constructors
- 3.6.17. Do not add a constructor with parameters to a class released without explicit constructors
3.7. Setters and getters
- 3.7.1. Start the name of methods returning non-Boolean properties with “get”
- 3.7.2. Start the name of methods returning Boolean properties with “is”, “can” or similar
- 3.7.3. Start the name of methods updating local properties with “set”
- 3.7.4. Validate the parameter of setter methods
- 3.7.5. Minimize work done in getters and setters
- 3.7.6. Consider returning immutable collections from a getter
- 3.7.7. Consider implementing a collection interface instead of a public propertie of a collection type
- 3.7.8. Consider read-only properties
- 3.7.9. Consider making a defensive copy when setting properties of mutable types
- 3.7.10. Consider making a defensive copy when returning properties of mutable type
- 3.7.11. Avoid returning arrays from getters
- 3.7.12. Avoid validations which cannot be done with local knowledge
- 3.7.13. Do not throw exceptions from a getter
- 3.7.14. Do not design set-only properties (with public setter no public getter)
- 3.7.15. Do not rely on the order properties are set
3.8. Callbacks
- 3.8.1. Design with the strongest possible precondition
- 3.8.2. Design with the weakest possible postcondition
- 3.8.3. Consider passing a reference to the object initiating the callback as the first parameter of the callback method
- 3.8.4. Avoid callbacks with return values
3.9. Documentation
- 3.9.1. Provide Javadoc comments for each method
- 3.9.2. Follow standard Javadoc conventions
- 3.9.3. Begin with a short, one sentence summary of the method
- 3.9.4. Indicate related methods
- 3.9.5. Indicate deprecated methods using the @deprecated tag
- 3.9.6. Indicate a replacement for any deprecated methods
- 3.9.7. Avoid lengthy comments
- 3.9.8. Document common behavioral patterns
- 3.9.9. Document the precise meaning of a null parameter value (if permitted)
- 3.9.10. Document the type of the method (stateless, accessor or mutator)
- 3.9.11. Document method preconditions
- 3.9.12. Document the performance characteristics of the algorithm implemented
- 3.9.13. Document remote method calls
- 3.9.14. Document methods accessing out-of-process resources
- 3.9.15. Document which API calls are permitted inside callback methods
- 3.9.16. Consider unit tests for illustrating the behavior of the method
发表评论
-
System.nanotime
2012-01-18 14:07 7511 nano sec = 100,000,000 sec ... -
JDK1.4和1.5的区别
2011-04-17 22:12 1621从语法层面上讲。 1,1.5增加并发包(java.uti ... -
简体繁体转换
2011-03-10 14:43 950package com.foxconn.ehc.test ... -
(转载)单例模式的七种写法
2011-03-09 14:21 963转自:http://cantellow.iteye.com/b ... -
sql 关联表update
2011-03-09 14:15 1172update customers a set ... -
Eclipse快捷键大全
2010-09-02 11:05 643Ctrl+1 快速修复(最经典的快捷键,就不用多说了) Ctr ... -
JAVA开发者应该去的20个英文网站
2010-08-31 14:29 802http://www.javaalmanac.com ... -
java中的静态变量和实例变量的生命周期
2010-08-27 17:26 2403类的成员变量有两种:一种是被static关键字修饰的变量,叫类 ... -
常用正则表达式
2010-08-19 15:32 740下面都是我收集的一些比较常用的正则表达式,因为平常可能在表 ... -
读书dddd
2010-06-04 16:55 834C: 《The c programming la ... -
收藏java技术网站
2010-05-19 11:28 814http://www.javaalmanac.com - Ja ...
相关推荐
### Java编程规范CheckList知识点详解 #### 一、概述 本文档旨在提供一份详尽的Java编程规范CheckList,帮助开发者遵循一致且高质量的编码标准。文档以表格形式列出了一系列编程过程中需要注意的关键事项,覆盖了...
首先,设计启动(Design Kick-off)阶段是整个项目的基础。在这个阶段,团队需要对项目计划、设计规格和其他项目文档进行审查并达成一致。以下是设计启动审查的关键检查点: 1. 项目名称:确保所有参与者都清楚项目...
本文将深入探讨"API Security Checklist"中的关键安全措施,以确保Python开发的API接口安全稳固。 1. **认证与授权**: - **API密钥**:为每个API用户分配唯一的访问密钥,用于识别和追踪请求来源。 - **OAuth2.0...
Java 代码审查检查清单 Java 是一种广泛使用的编程语言,用于开发各种应用程序。为了确保 Java 代码的质量和可靠性,代码审查是一个非常重要的步骤。代码审查可以帮助开发者发现和修复错误,提高代码的可读性和可...
### PCB设计检查清单详解 #### 一、项目基本信息 - **项目名称**:明确项目名称,便于管理和查询。 - **版本号**:记录当前设计版本,方便追踪变更历史。 - **项目组成员**:列出参与项目的团队成员名单,确保责任...
### APP上线发版前Checklist及崩溃常见原因详解 #### 一、Checklist概述 为了确保应用程序能够在多种设备和网络环境下稳定运行,并提供良好的用户体验,制定一个详尽的上线前检查清单至关重要。此清单旨在帮助开发...
根据提供的文档信息,我们可以归纳出一份关于KSZ8863RLL硬件设计的重要知识点。 ### KSZ8863RLL硬件设计手册 #### 一、简介 本手册为Microchip公司KSZ8863RLL硬件设计提供了一份详尽的设计检查清单。...
3. **DFT(Design for Testability)**:检查是否需要考虑扫描链的重新排序,是否使用内存BIST(Built-in Self Test)或边界扫描。静态时序分析(STA)约束是否以SDC格式提供。 4. **时钟特性**:识别设计中的时钟...
- S3C2416_Circuit_Design_CheckList_V02:这是一个针对三星S3C2416微处理器的电路设计清单的版本2。清单的版本号表明这是更新过的设计规范,可能包含对初始设计标准的修正或新增要求。 描述解析: - 三星原版S3C...
Api-API-Security-Checklist.zip,在设计、测试和发布API时,最重要安全对策清单的设计、测试和发布时最重要安全对策清单意大利人克孜族,一个api可以被认为是多个软件设备之间通信的指导手册。例如,api可用于web应用...
"各阶段的checklist" 提供了一种系统化的方法,通过各个阶段的检查清单来确保软件项目在不同阶段的代码质量、测试覆盖和文档完整性。以下是对这个主题的详细阐述: 一、需求分析阶段 在项目启动时,清晰、准确的...
This document provides recommendations for new designs based on the P2020 QorIQ integrated processor. This chip combines dual e500v2 processor cores built on Power Architecture® technology with ...
逻辑类问题(A类)-指设计、编码中出现的计算正确性和一致性、程序逻辑控制等方面出现的问题,在系统中起关键作用,将导致软件死机、功能正常实现等严重问题; 接口类问题(B类)-指设计、编码中出现的函数和环境...
测试用例设计是软件质量保证的关键环节,Checklist是一款专为这一目的而设计的工具,旨在帮助测试工程师高效地创建、管理和执行测试用例。在本文中,我们将深入探讨Checklist的功能、使用方法以及它如何优化测试过程...
标书全流程checklist 启动投标 制作标书 标书封装
c_xtp301-design-methodology-checklist
jQuery Checklist还提供了一些方便的API方法,如`checkAll`、`uncheckAll`和`getValue`: ```javascript // Check all items $('#myChecklist').checklist('checkAll'); // Uncheck all items $('#myChecklist')....
需求Checklist需求Checklist 需求Checklist是软件开发过程中极为重要的一步骤,它直接关系到项目的成功与否。为确保需求分析的正确性,《代码大全 2》提供了一份详细的Checklist,以便判断需求分析是否做好了。本文...
"Sales Page Design Checklist" 是一个专为WordPress用户设计的插件,旨在帮助用户按照分步清单来构建高效、吸引人的销售页面。以下是这个插件涉及的关键知识点:** 1. **WordPress插件**:WordPress是一款开源的...
### 转系统测试Checklist知识点详解 #### 一、转系统测试Checklist概述 转系统测试Checklist是一份用于确保软件从开发阶段顺利过渡到系统测试阶段的清单。这份清单帮助团队确认所有必要的准备工作已经完成,从而...