在网上买了VPS, 不知道性能如何, 这里一个工具
http://code.google.com/p/byte-unixbench/
UnixBench is the original BYTE UNIX benchmark suite, updated and revised by many people over the years. The purpose of UnixBench is to provide a basic indicator of the performance of a Unix-like system; ... These test results are then compared to the scores from a baseline system to produce an index value, which is generally easier to handle than the raw scores. Multi-CPU systems are handled. ... UnixBench was first started in 1983 at Monash University, as a simple synthetic benchmarking application. It was then taken and expanded by Byte Magazine. ... The tests compare Unix systems by comparing their results to a set of scores set by running the code on a benchmark system, which is a SPARCstation 20-61 (rated at 10.0).
wget http://byte-unixbench.googlecode.com/files/UnixBench5.1.3.tgz tar zxf ./UnixBench5.1.3.tgz cd ./UnixBench ./Run
然后等待, 输出如下
写道
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Mon Oct 15 2012 23:55:22 - 00:23:16
4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 12015218.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 2214.8 MWIPS (10.1 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 896.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 58968.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 14578.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 422068.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 70993.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 16001.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 1861.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 2525.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 737.8 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 432496.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 12015218.4 1029.6
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2214.8 402.7
Execl Throughput 43.0 896.9 208.6
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 58968.3 148.9
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 14578.6 88.1
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 422068.2 727.7
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 70993.3 57.1
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 16001.5 40.0
Process Creation 126.0 1861.8 147.8
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2525.5 595.6
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 737.8 1229.7
System Call Overhead 15000.0 432496.2 288.3
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 249.7
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Tue Oct 16 2012 00:23:16 - 00:51:20
4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 42619039.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 8274.0 MWIPS (10.4 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 3398.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 68332.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 21462.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 718205.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 149713.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 61968.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 5321.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 5957.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 812.6 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 1557391.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 42619039.2 3652.0
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 8274.0 1504.4
Execl Throughput 43.0 3398.5 790.4
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 68332.4 172.6
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 21462.9 129.7
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 718205.6 1238.3
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 149713.5 120.3
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 61968.3 154.9
Process Creation 126.0 5321.7 422.4
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 5957.1 1405.0
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 812.6 1354.3
System Call Overhead 15000.0 1557391.5 1038.3
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 592.5
Benchmark Run: Mon Oct 15 2012 23:55:22 - 00:23:16
4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 12015218.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 2214.8 MWIPS (10.1 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 896.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 58968.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 14578.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 422068.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 70993.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 16001.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 1861.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 2525.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 737.8 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 432496.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 12015218.4 1029.6
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2214.8 402.7
Execl Throughput 43.0 896.9 208.6
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 58968.3 148.9
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 14578.6 88.1
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 422068.2 727.7
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 70993.3 57.1
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 16001.5 40.0
Process Creation 126.0 1861.8 147.8
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2525.5 595.6
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 737.8 1229.7
System Call Overhead 15000.0 432496.2 288.3
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 249.7
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Tue Oct 16 2012 00:23:16 - 00:51:20
4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 42619039.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 8274.0 MWIPS (10.4 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 3398.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 68332.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 21462.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 718205.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 149713.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 61968.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 5321.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 5957.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 812.6 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 1557391.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 42619039.2 3652.0
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 8274.0 1504.4
Execl Throughput 43.0 3398.5 790.4
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 68332.4 172.6
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 21462.9 129.7
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 718205.6 1238.3
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 149713.5 120.3
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 61968.3 154.9
Process Creation 126.0 5321.7 422.4
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 5957.1 1405.0
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 812.6 1354.3
System Call Overhead 15000.0 1557391.5 1038.3
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 592.5
另一个VPS的测试结果
写道
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1662.9 2771.5
System Call Overhead 15000.0 2590745.8 1727.2
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 910.7
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Wed Jan 30 2013 08:15:32 - 08:43:46
3 CPUs in system; running 3 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 66490986.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 8662.1 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 7881.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 841743.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 229619.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2423683.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 4408075.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 338964.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 18604.0 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 15285.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2127.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 5281768.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 66490986.5 5697.6
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 8662.1 1574.9
Execl Throughput 43.0 7881.6 1832.9
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 841743.9 2125.6
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 229619.2 1387.4
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2423683.7 4178.8
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 4408075.6 3543.5
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 338964.4 847.4
Process Creation 126.0 18604.0 1476.5
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 15285.3 3605.0
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2127.5 3545.8
System Call Overhead 15000.0 5281768.1 3521.2
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 2420.5
System Call Overhead 15000.0 2590745.8 1727.2
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 910.7
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Wed Jan 30 2013 08:15:32 - 08:43:46
3 CPUs in system; running 3 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 66490986.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 8662.1 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 7881.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 841743.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 229619.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2423683.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 4408075.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 338964.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 18604.0 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 15285.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2127.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 5281768.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 66490986.5 5697.6
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 8662.1 1574.9
Execl Throughput 43.0 7881.6 1832.9
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 841743.9 2125.6
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 229619.2 1387.4
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2423683.7 4178.8
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 4408075.6 3543.5
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 338964.4 847.4
Process Creation 126.0 18604.0 1476.5
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 15285.3 3605.0
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2127.5 3545.8
System Call Overhead 15000.0 5281768.1 3521.2
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 2420.5
Results
Here are some benchmarking results from UnixBench. Click on a system name to see the full results:
System | CPU | OS | UnixBench Version |
System | Graphics | ||
Single | Dual | 2D | 3D | ||||
HP Compaq nc8430 | Core Duo T2500 @ 2.00GHz | openSUSE 10.2 (i586) | 5.0 | 678.2 | 1026.2 | ||
HP Compaq nc8430 | Core Duo T2500 @ 2.00GHz | openSUSE 10.3 (i586) | 5.0 | 495.7 | 802.7 | ||
HP Compaq nc8430 | Core Duo T2500 @ 2.00GHz | openSUSE 10.3 (i586) | 5.1 | 493.8 | 797.0 | 668.7 | 731.8 |
Sony Vaio TXN25N | Core Solo U1500 @ 1.33GHz | openSUSE 10.2 (i586) | 5.0 | 498.4 | n/a | ||
Sony Vaio TXN25N | Core Solo U1500 @ 1.33GHz | openSUSE 10.3 (i586) | 5.0 | 426.0 | n/a | ||
Sony Vaio TXN25N | Core Solo U1500 @ 1.33GHz | openSUSE 10.3 (i586) | 5.1.1 | 437.5 | n/a | 730.9 | 209.6 |
Sony Vaio TXN25N | Core Solo U1500 @ 1.33GHz | openSUSE 10.3 (i586) (runlevel 1) | 5.1.1 | 385.4 | n/a | ||
Dell Latitude D620 | Core 2 Duo T5600 @ 1.83GHz | openSUSE 10.3 (i586) | 5.0 | 560.1 | 1013.1 | ||
Dell Latitude D620 | Core 2 Duo T5600 @ 1.83GHz | openSUSE 10.3 (i586) | 5.1 | 575.2 | 1024.0 | 1080.2 | 267.1 |
Dell Latitude D620 | Core 2 Duo T5600 @ 1.83GHz | openSUSE 10.1 (X86-64) | 5.1.1 | 685.6 | 1186.1 | 1335.2 | 411.9 |
Dell Latitude D620 | Core 2 Duo T5600 @ 1.83GHz | openSUSE 10.2 (X86-64) | 5.1.1 | 684.8 | 1178.7 | 1243.2 | 405.6 |
Dell Latitude D620 | Core 2 Duo T5600 @ 1.83GHz | openSUSE 10.3 (X86-64) | 5.1.1 | 678.6 | 1125.6 | 1263.4 | 363.8 |
HP Compaq 8510w | Core 2 Duo CPU T7500 @ 2.20GHz | openSUSE 10.3 (X86-64) | 5.1.1 | 842.5 | 1192.2 | 4886.9 | 3613.8 |
相关推荐
UnixBench会执行一系列的测试,包括2D和3D图形系统的性能衡量,测试的结果不仅仅只是CPU,内存,或者磁盘为基准,还取决于硬件,操作系统版本,编译器.
分享一下常用的VPS服务器一键性能测试脚本,可以用来测试机器的配置和性能,测试VPS服务器的网络速度,硬盘性能等。 这里收集一些测试脚本,脚本均来自于网络,代码内有作者信息,感谢网络大神们提供这么优秀的工具...
所有源码均经过严格测试,可以直接运行,可以放心下载使用。有任何使用问题欢迎随时与博主沟通,第一时间进行解答!Linux系统是一个免费使用和自由传播的类Unix操作系统,基于POSIX和UNIX的多用户、多任务、支持多...
3. **模拟与测试**:在实际部署前,FX-VPS软件可以进行离线模拟,验证程序的正确性和系统的稳定性,减少现场调试的时间和风险。 4. **故障诊断**:通过实时监控和报警功能,软件可以帮助用户及时发现并解决设备可能...
【标题】"三菱FX-VPS-E FX2N-10GM,20GM编程软件" 涉及的核心知识点是三菱公司的PLC(可编程逻辑控制器)编程工具,特别是针对FX系列的产品,如FX2N-10GM和FX2N-20GM定位模块的编程软件。 三菱FX系列PLC是广泛应用于...
奇遇科技服务器性能测试工具当前支持的测试: 中央处理器内存磁盘等待添加的:网路SQLite3 MySQL PostgreSQL注意:版权归属 奇遇科技 公司, 保留所有权利。您没有被授于 fork 此仓库的权利, 请不要 fork 此代码库。
总的来说,FX2N-20GM编程软件与FX-VPS的结合使用,为工业自动化领域的工程师提供了强大的工具,实现了对FX2N-20GM的精确控制,从而提高了生产效率和设备性能。无论是新手还是经验丰富的专业人士,都能借助这款软件...
这个简单的工具可以在大约10分钟内测试linux服务器/ vps的性能,并对报告进行更新,该报告可以共享给其他人。 目前,LemonBench支持i386/i686 , x86_64 , armel/armhf , arm64/aarch64体系结构,并支持CentOS / ...
在`sps_pps_parser-master`这个压缩包中,可能包含的文件有源代码文件(`.java`)、编译后的类文件(`.class`)、项目配置文件(如`build.xml` for Ant 或 `pom.xml` for Maven)、测试文件以及可能的文档和示例。...
在我们用雅虎浏览器工具Yslow时,就有这么一个优化选项,全称为:Configure entity tags (ETags),即配置实体标记,什么是Etags?ETags(Entity tags)是服务器和浏览器的一个功能,它用来判断浏览器缓存里的元素是否...
可能包含对其他方法的实现或者性能测试代码。 4. `main.m`:这通常是整个程序的入口点,调用其他函数并控制流程。 5. `Makefile`:这是用于编译和构建项目的配置文件,尽管MATLAB不是C/C++语言,但可能包含了一些...
用户可以通过FX20GM软件编写、测试和调试控制程序,实现对电机、伺服驱动器等运动部件的高效管理。 VPS(Virtual Programming Station)文件是三菱运动控制系统的程序文件格式,如"zx-x+y2.vps"和"vps"所示。这些...
该平台支持多类型的虚拟化业务统一管理,包括VDI桌面、XenApp和VPS,具备自动化工具,如黑匣子、一键式桌面优化和自动数据迁移工具,大大提升了管理效率。 华为的安全管理平台与虚拟桌面配套,对瘦客户端硬件和用户...
通过仿真,可以测试液压系统在各种工况下的响应和性能,进而对设计进行必要的调整和完善。 总之,基于Matlab/Simulink的液压挖掘机液压系统仿真分析为设计提供了快速、经济且高效的方法。这种方法不仅能够减少实际...
FX2N系列是三菱电机推出的一款高性能微型可编程控制器(PLC),广泛应用于自动化设备的控制。FX2N-20GM是一款具有20个输入/输出点的模块,适用于小型自动化系统的解决方案。这款PLC提供了丰富的功能和扩展性,支持...
- **硬件跳线设置**:提供了CPC系统中8KE1板、VPS板以及EAN用户接入单元的跳线配置方法,这些设置直接影响交换机的功能和性能。 - **EAN不同配置时具体位置举例**:提供了根据实际需求调整EAN单元配置的实例,帮助...
CmlPHP V2.x 支持根目录、子目录,单入口、多入口部署、支持独立服务器、虚拟主机、VPS等多种环境,绝大部分开发环境可直接运行,无需配置伪静态规则(部分低版本server只要修改框架URL配置即可,框架会自动处理),...
- Laravel 支持多种部署方式,如共享主机、VPS 或 Docker 容器。 - 定期的代码版本控制、测试和更新确保系统的稳定运行。 通过深入理解和运用 Laravel 框架,LAVSMS 实现了一个高效且全面的学校管理系统,满足了...
**HONEYWELL 阀门检漏仪**(A4021系列)是一种基于微处理器的自检阀门证明系统(Valve Proving System, VPS),专门用于检测自动关闭阀门的有效闭合情况。该系统通过测量测试序列中两个阀门之间的压力差来检查阀门...
综上所述,React-Todo项目不仅展示了React的基本使用,还涵盖了现代前端开发中的许多实践,如状态管理、性能优化和测试策略,是学习和理解React生态系统的良好实例。通过这个项目,开发者可以深入理解React的工作...