Avoiding Mutating Tables
Ok, so you've just recieved the error:
ORA-04091: table XXXX is mutating, trigger/function may not see it
and you want to get around that. This short article will describe and demonstrate the various methods of getting around the mutating table error.
If you are interested in why you are getting it and in what cases you will get it, please see the Oracle Server Application Developers Guide (click here to read it right now -- this link is to technet.oracle.com. You need a password to access this site but you can get one right away for free).
Avoiding the mutating table error is fairly easy. We must defer processing against the mutating or constrainng table until an AFTER trigger. We will consider two cases:
- Hitting the ORA-4091 in an INSERT trigger or an UPDATE trigger where you only need access to the :new values
- Hitting the ORA-4091 in a DELETE trigger or an UPDATE trigger where you need to access the :old values
Case 1 - you only need to access the :new values
This case is the simplest. What we will do is capture the ROWIDS of the inserted or udpated rows. We can then use these ROWIDS in an AFTER trigger to query up the affected rows.
It always takes 3 triggers to work around the mutating table error. They are:
- A before trigger to set the package state to a known, consistent state
- An after, row level trigger to capture each rows changes
- An after trigger to actually process the change.
As an example -- to show how to do this, we will attempt to answer the following question:
I have a table containing a key/status/effective date combination. When status
changes, the values are propagated by trigger to a log table recording the
status history. When no RI constraint is in place everything works fine.
When an RI trigger enforces a parent-child relationship, the status change
logging trigger fails because the parent table is mutating. Propagating the
values to the log table implicitly generates a lookup back to the parent table
to ensure the RI constraint is satisfied.
I do not want to drop the RI constraint. I realize that the status is
denormalized. I want it that way. What is a good way to maintain the log?
Here is the implementation:
SQL> create table parent
2 ( theKey int primary key,
3 status varchar2(1),
4 effDate date
5 )
6 /
Table created.
SQL> create table log_table
2 ( theKey int references parent(theKey),
3 status varchar2(1),
4 effDate date
5 )
6 /
Table created.
SQL> REM this package is used to maintain our state. We will save the rowids of newly
SQL> REM inserted / updated rows in this package. We declare 2 arrays -- one will
SQL> REM hold our new rows rowids (newRows). The other is used to reset this array,
SQL> REM it is an 'empty' array
SQL> create or replace package state_pkg
2 as
3 type ridArray is table of rowid index by binary_integer;
4
4 newRows ridArray;
5 empty ridArray;
6 end;
7 /
Package created.
SQL> REM We must set the state of the above package to some known, consistent state
SQL> REM before we being processing the row triggers. This trigger is mandatory,
SQL> REM we *cannot* rely on the AFTER trigger to reset the package state. This
SQL> REM is because during a multi-row insert or update, the ROW trigger may fire
SQL> REM but the AFTER tirgger does not have to fire -- if the second row in an update
SQL> REM fails due to some constraint error -- the row trigger will have fired 2 times
SQL> REM but the AFTER trigger (which we relied on to reset the package) will never fire.
SQL> REM That would leave 2 erroneous rowids in the newRows array for the next insert/update
SQL> REM to see. Therefore, before the insert / update takes place, we 'reset'
SQL> create or replace trigger parent_bi
2 before insert or update on parent
3 begin
4 state_pkg.newRows := state_pkg.empty;
5 end;
6 /
Trigger created.
SQL> REM This trigger simply captures the rowid of the affected row and
SQL> REM saves it in the newRows array.
SQL> create or replace trigger parent_aifer
2 after insert or update of status on parent for each row
3 begin
4 state_pkg.newRows( state_pkg.newRows.count+1 ) := :new.rowid;
5 end;
6 /
Trigger created.
SQL> REM this trigger processes the new rows. We simply loop over the newRows
SQL> REM array processing each newly inserted/modified row in turn.
SQL> create or replace trigger parent_ai
2 after insert or update of status on parent
3 begin
4 for i in 1 .. state_pkg.newRows.count loop
5 insert into log_table
6 select theKey, status, effDate
7 from parent where rowid = state_pkg.newRows(i);
8 end loop;
9 end;
10 /
Trigger created.
SQL> REM this demonstrates that we can process single and multi-row inserts/updates
SQL> REM without failure (and can do it correctly)
SQL> insert into parent values ( 1, 'A', sysdate-5 );
1 row created.
SQL> insert into parent values ( 2, 'B', sysdate-4 );
1 row created.
SQL> insert into parent values ( 3, 'C', sysdate-3 );
1 row created.
SQL> insert into parent select theKey+6, status, effDate+1 from parent;
3 rows created.
SQL> select * from log_table;
THEKEY S EFFDATE
---------- - ---------
1 A 04-AUG-99
2 B 05-AUG-99
3 C 06-AUG-99
7 A 05-AUG-99
8 B 06-AUG-99
9 C 07-AUG-99
6 rows selected.
SQL> update parent set status = chr( ascii(status)+1 ), effDate = sysdate;
6 rows updated.
SQL> select * from log_table;
THEKEY S EFFDATE
---------- - ---------
1 A 04-AUG-99
2 B 05-AUG-99
3 C 06-AUG-99
7 A 05-AUG-99
8 B 06-AUG-99
9 C 07-AUG-99
1 B 09-AUG-99
2 C 09-AUG-99
3 D 09-AUG-99
7 B 09-AUG-99
8 C 09-AUG-99
9 D 09-AUG-99
12 rows selected.
Case 2 - you need to access the :old values
This one is a little more involved but the concept is the same. We'll save the actual OLD values in an array (as opposed to just the rowids of the new rows). Using tables of records this is fairly straightforward. Lets say we wanted to implement a flag delete of data -- that is, instead of actually deleting the record, you would like to set a date field to SYSDATE and keep the record in the table (but hide it from queries). We need to 'undo' the delete.
In Oracle8.0 and up, we could use "INSTEAD OF" triggers on a view to do this, but in 7.3 the implementation would look like this:
SQL> REM this is the table we will be flag deleting from.
SQL> REM No one will ever access this table directly, rather,
SQL> REM they will perform all insert/update/delete/selects against
SQL> REM a view on this table..
SQL> create table delete_demo ( a int,
2 b date,
3 c varchar2(10),
4 hidden_date date default to_date( '01-01-0001', 'DD-MM-YYYY' ),
5 primary key(a,hidden_date) )
6 /
Table created.
SQL> REM this is our view. All DML will take place on the view, the table
SQL> REM will not be touched.
SQL> create or replace view delete_demo_view as
2 select a, b, c from delete_demo where hidden_date = to_date( '01-01-0001', 'DD-MM-YYYY' )
3 /
View created.
SQL> grant all on delete_demo_view to public
2 /
Grant succeeded.
SQL> REM here is the state package again. This time the array is of
SQL> REM TABLE%ROWTYPE -- not just a rowid
SQL> create or replace package delete_demo_pkg
2 as
3 type array is table of delete_demo%rowtype index by binary_integer;
4
4 oldvals array;
5 empty array;
6 end;
7 /
Package created.
SQL> REM the reset trigger...
SQL> create or replace trigger delete_demo_bd
2 before delete on delete_demo
3 begin
4 delete_demo_pkg.oldvals := delete_demo_pkg.empty;
5 end;
6 /
Trigger created.
SQL> REM Here, instead of capturing the rowid, we must capture the before image
SQL> REM of the row.
SQL> REM We cannot really undo the delete here, we are just capturing the deleted
SQL> REM data
SQL> create or replace trigger delete_demo_bdfer
2 before delete on delete_demo
3 for each row
4 declare
5 i number default delete_demo_pkg.oldvals.count+1;
6 begin
7 delete_demo_pkg.oldvals(i).a := :old.a;
8 delete_demo_pkg.oldvals(i).b := :old.b;
9 delete_demo_pkg.oldvals(i).c := :old.c;
10 end;
11 /
Trigger created.
SQL> REM Now, we can put the deleted data back into the table. We put SYSDATE
SQL> REM in as the hidden_date field -- that shows us when the record was deleted.
SQL> create or replace trigger delete_demo_ad
2 after delete on delete_demo
3 begin
4 for i in 1 .. delete_demo_pkg.oldvals.count loop
5 insert into delete_demo ( a, b, c, hidden_date )
6 values
7 ( delete_demo_pkg.oldvals(i).a, delete_demo_pkg.oldvals(i).b,
8 delete_demo_pkg.oldvals(i).c, sysdate );
9 end loop;
10 end;
11 /
Trigger created.
SQL> REM Now, to show it at work...
SQL> insert into delete_demo_view values ( 1, sysdate, 'Hello' );
1 row created.
SQL> insert into delete_demo_view values ( 2, sysdate, 'Goodbye' );
1 row created.
SQL> select * from delete_demo_view;
A B C
---------- --------- ----------
1 09-AUG-99 Hello
2 09-AUG-99 Goodbye
SQL> delete from delete_demo_view;
2 rows deleted.
SQL> select * from delete_demo_view;
no rows selected
SQL> select * from delete_demo;
A B C HIDDEN_DA
---------- --------- ---------- ---------
1 09-AUG-99 Hello 09-AUG-99
2 09-AUG-99 Goodbye 09-AUG-99
分享到:
相关推荐
【避免垃圾邮件】 在互联网发展的历程中,从最初的物理学数据分享平台,到如今成为文化、教育,特别是商业生活的核心部分,网络已经变得无处不在。数以百万计的用户现在通过网页进行各种金融交易,包括购物、预订...
C++ Gotchas Avoiding Common Problems in Coding and Design 英文epub 本资源转载自网络,如有侵权,请联系上传者或csdn删除 本资源转载自网络,如有侵权,请联系上传者或csdn删除
气候变化研究中关于温度极端指数的处理方法Using a Monte Carlo simulation, it is demonstrated that percentile-based temperature indices computed for climate change detection and monitoring may contain ...
Avoiding Read While Write Errors When In-Software Flash
在IT领域,尤其是在数据存储与保护的技术探讨中,《Avoiding the Disk Bottleneck in the Data Domain Deduplication File System》一文提供了深入的见解和技术解决方案,旨在优化基于磁盘的重复数据删除...
ARDUINO_OBSTACLE_AVOIDING_CAR 避开基于arduino的车辆的障碍在此存储库中,我仅给出了避开arduino基础车辆的障碍物的源代码。 您可以单击链接以获取源代码。 链接:
A note on cover-avoiding properties of finite groups,刘建军,郭秀云,A subgroup H of a group G is said to be a CAP*-subgroup of a group G if, for any non-Frattini chief factor K/L of G, we have HK=HL...
自回避行走(Self-Avoiding Walk,简称SAW)是一种在数学、物理和化学领域广泛研究的统计力学模型。在该模型中,一个行走者在二维或三维空间中移动,但不能与其之前走过的路径重叠,即行走的每一步都不能与之前的...
当构建使用动态VI的可执行文件时,必须确保在LabVIEW Application Builder规范的'always include'部分指定动态VI的名称。不这样做会导致问题,表现为LabVIEW应用程序将无法加载您的动态Vl,并将引发各种错误或导致...
1Avoiding AVX-SSE Transition PenaltiesTransitioning between 256-bit Intel:registered: AVX instructions and legacy Intel:registered: SSE instructions within a program may cause performance penalties ...
An-OARSMan: An Obstacle-Avoiding Rectilinear Steiner Tree Algorithm with Good Length Performance,胡昱,经彤,Routing is one of the important steps in VLSI/ULSI physical design. The rectilinear ...
是讲述安全编程的好书!!!
【Server Virtualization: 避免I/O陷阱】 在服务器虚拟化的过程中,企业通常能体验到应用程序部署的简化和整体服务器利用率的提升。然而,如果不考虑相应的存储I/O性能调整,这种快速整合可能会导致性能影响的隐患...
根据提供的文件信息,本书《C++ Gotchas: Avoiding Common Problems in Coding and Design》由Stephen C. Dewhurst撰写,出版商为Addison Wesley,出版日期为2002年11月29日,ISBN号为0-321-12518-5,全书共有352页...
Although I wrote the first edition of this book more than 25 years ago, my goals for it remain the same. I want students to receive a solid intro- duction to the traditional topics....
### 如何避免在量化政治学中使用统计数据时犯错 #### 概述 本文由纽约大学的Gary King撰写,旨在揭示量化政治科学文献中频繁出现的一系列严重理论错误。这些错误通常基于错误的统计理论或不当的统计分析方法。...
介绍了一个结合模型预测控制(Model Predictive Control, MPC)技术的自动避障和汽车跟踪项目。通过建立精确的车辆动力学模型和环境感知模型,实现了对车辆行为的实时预测和控制,有效避免了障碍物并实现了稳定的汽车...