代理 与 子类化

最近看一个斯坦福的视频， 里面的Cocoa框架大量使用了代理模式，定制类的行为，

 

学生就发问了，为什么不采用子类化的策略呢，

 

老师就说了 子类化 和 代理都是起到代码分离的作用。无所谓对错，有人喜欢子类化，有人喜欢代理，这是一个需要综合考虑的设计决策

 

 

自己写点东西记一下

 

package delegate.subclass;

public class UIApplication {

    Object view = new Object();

    public String draw() {
        return "draw a button on view" + view;
    }
}

 

package delegate.subclass;

public class UIApplicationSubclassA extends UIApplication {

    public String draw() {
        return "draw a text on view " + view;
    }
}

 

package delegate.subclass;

public class UIApplicationSubclassB extends UIApplication {
    
    public String draw() {
        return "draw a label on view " + view;
    }
    
}

 

 

 

package delegate.delegate;

public class UIApplcation {
    
    Object view;

    IViewController delegate;
    

    public void setDelegate (IViewController delegate ){
        this.delegate = delegate;
        view=delegate.getView();
    }
    
    public String draw(){
        return delegate.draw();
    }
}

 

package delegate.delegate;

public interface IViewController {
    String draw();
    Object getView();
}

 

 

package delegate.delegate;

public class AppDelegateA implements IViewController {

    Object view = new Object();

    @Override
    public String draw() {
        return "draw a text on view " + view;
    }

    @Override
    public Object getView() {
        return view;
    }

}

 

package delegate.delegate;

public class AppDelegateB implements IViewController {

    Object view = new Object();

    @Override
    public String draw() {
        return "draw a label on view " + view;
    }

    @Override
    public Object getView() {
        return view;
    }

}

 

 

 

 

package delegate;

import delegate.delegate.AppDelegateA;
import delegate.delegate.AppDelegateB;
import delegate.subclass.UIApplication;
import delegate.subclass.UIApplicationSubclassA;
import delegate.subclass.UIApplicationSubclassB;

public class Client {
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        System.out.println("test subclass---------------------");
        UIApplication sub1 =new UIApplicationSubclassA();
        System.out.println(sub1.draw());
        
        UIApplication sub2 =new UIApplicationSubclassB();
        System.out.println(sub2.draw());
        
        
        System.out.println("test delegate---------------------");
        delegate.delegate.UIApplcation app1 =new  delegate.delegate.UIApplcation();
        AppDelegateA delegateA= new AppDelegateA();
        app1.setDelegate(delegateA);
        System.out.println(app1.draw());
        
        delegate.delegate.UIApplcation app2 =new  delegate.delegate.UIApplcation();
        AppDelegateB delegateB= new AppDelegateB();
        app2.setDelegate(delegateB);
        System.out.println(app2.draw());
    }
}

 

 

 

console

test subclass---------------------
draw a text on view java.lang.Object@14318bb
draw a label on view java.lang.Object@ca0b6
test delegate---------------------
draw a text on view java.lang.Object@1b67f74
draw a label on view java.lang.Object@173a10f

 

评论

4 楼 cczakai 2011-03-03  

一般是组合或者聚合 这种关系比继承关系要好些，组合模式不一样。

采用组合或者聚合有助于保持每个类被封装到单个任务上，这样类和继承的层次规模保持最小，不可能增长成为庞然大物。

3 楼 lcfred 2010-12-05  

组合总比继承好。。

2 楼 gdpglc 2010-12-05  

对delegate的翻译，比较习惯用委托。
看到你说代理，还以为是Proxy

1 楼 ustcfrank 2010-12-05  

有一条Design Principle: Favor composition over inheritance.