`

Comparing Struts 1 and 2

阅读更多
  Feature Struts 1 Struts 2 Action classes Threading Model Servlet Dependency Testability Harvesting Input Expression Language Binding values into views Type Conversion Validation Control Of Action Execution
Struts 1 requires Action classes to extend an abstract base class. A common problem in Struts 1 is programming to abstract classes instead of interfaces. An Struts 2 Action may implement an Action interface, along with other interfaces to enable optional and custom services. Struts 2 provides a base ActionSupport class to implement commonly used interfaces. Albeit, the Action interface is not required. Any POJO object with a execute signature can be used as an Struts 2 Action object.
Struts 1 Actions are singletons and must be thread-safe since there will only be one instance of a class to handle all requests for that Action. The singleton strategy places restrictions on what can be done with Struts 1 Actions and requires extra care to develop. Action resources must be thread-safe or synchronized. Struts 2 Action objects are instantiated for each request, so there are no thread-safety issues. (In practice, servlet containers generate many throw-away objects per request, and one more object does not impose a performance penalty or impact garbage collection.)
Struts 1 Actions have dependencies on the servlet API since the HttpServletRequest and HttpServletResponse is passed to the execute method when an Action is invoked. Struts 2 Actions are not coupled to a container. Most often the servlet contexts are represented as simple Maps, allowing Actions to be tested in isolation. Struts 2 Actions can still access the original request and response, if required. However, other architectural elements reduce or eliminate the need to access the HttpServetRequest or HttpServletResponse directly.
A major hurdle to testing Struts 1 Actions is that the execute method exposes the Servlet API. A third-party extension, Struts TestCase, offers a set of mock object for Struts 1. Struts 2 Actions can be tested by instantiating the Action, setting properties, and invoking methods. Dependency Injection support also makes testing simpler.
Struts 1 uses an ActionForm object to capture input. Like Actions, all ActionForms must extend a base class. Since  other JavaBeans cannot be used as ActionForms, developers often create redundant classes to capture input. DynaBeans can used as an alternative to creating conventional ActionForm classes, but, here too, developers may be redescribing existing JavaBeans.
Struts 2 uses Action properties as input properties, eliminating the need for a second input object. Input properties may be rich object types which may have their own properties. The Action properties can can be accessed from the web page via the taglibs. Struts 2 also supports the ActionForm pattern, as well as POJO form objects and POJO Actions. Rich object types, including business or domain objects, can be used as input/output objects. The ModelDriven feature simplifies taglb references to POJO input objects.
Struts 1 integrates with JSTL, so it uses the JSTL EL. The EL has basic object graph traversal, but relatively weak collection and indexed property support. Struts 2 can use JSTL, but the framework also supports a more powerful and flexible expression language called "Object Graph Notation Language" (OGNL).
Struts 1 uses the standard JSP mechanism for binding objects into the page context for access. Struts 2 uses a "ValueStack" technology so that the taglibs can access values without coupling your view to the object type it is rendering. The ValueStack strategy allows reuse of views across a range of types which may have the same property name but different property types.
Struts 1 ActionForm properties are usually all Strings. Struts 1 uses Commons-Beanutils for type conversion. Converters are per-class, and not configurable per instance. Struts 2 uses OGNL for type conversion. The framework includes converters for basic and common object types and primitives.
Struts 1 supports manual validation via a validate method on the ActionForm, or through an extension to the Commons Validator. Classes can have different validation contexts for the same class, but cannot chain to validations on sub-objects. Struts 2 supports manual validation via the validate method and the XWork Validation framework. The Xwork Validation Framework supports chaining validation into sub-properties using the validations defined for the properties class type and the validation context.
Struts 1 supports separate Request Processors (lifecycles) for each module, but all the Actions in the module must share the same lifecycle. Struts 2 supports creating different lifecycles on a per Action basis via Interceptor Stacks. Custom stacks can be created and used with different Actions, as needed.
分享到:
评论

相关推荐

    Comparing the Struts 1 and Struts 2 Web Application Frameworks

    文章“Comparing the Struts 1 and Struts 2 Web Application Frameworks”可能详细分析了这两个框架的各个方面,包括但不限于配置方式、开发效率、错误处理、性能测试等。通过阅读文档,开发者可以获取更多实用的...

    Analyzing and Comparing Montgomery Multiplication Algorithms

    “Analyzing and Comparing Montgomery Multiplication Algorithms”(分析与比较蒙哥马利模乘算法)这篇文章旨在深入探讨并对比不同的蒙哥马利模乘算法实现方法。蒙哥马利模乘算法是一种在计算机科学中广泛应用的...

    Comparing Web Frameworks; Struts, Spring MVC, WebWork, Tapestry & JSF.pdf

    此软件介绍webwork and struts and jsf的区别

    Characterizing and Comparing Phylogenies from their Laplacian Spectrum)

    在内容部分中,提到的文章“Characterizing and Comparing Phylogenies from their Laplacian Spectrum”发表在系统生物学杂志(Systematic Biology)上,卷号为65,期号为3,页码范围495-507。文章是通过拉普拉斯谱...

    Comparing LDA and SVM

    2002年发表的论文《Comparing Linear Discriminant Analysis and Support Vector Machine》对比了这两种算法在分类任务中的表现和特点。由于文档内容是由OCR扫描技术处理,可能包含文字识别错误或遗漏。不过,我们仍...

    Comparing Realism and Idealism as Classic Schools of Thought

    Comparing Realism and Idealism as Classic Schools of Thought

    Attention Flows:Analyzing and Comparing Attention Mechanisms in Language Models

    本文《Attention Flows:Analyzing and Comparing Attention Mechanisms in Language Models》是一篇研究论文,主要关注于深度学习领域内语言模型的注意力机制。随着自然语言处理(NLP)技术的发展,基于注意力机制...

    Comparing ORB and AKAZE

    ORB(Oriented FAST and Rotated BRIEF)和AKAZE(Accelerated-KAZE)是两种用于此目的的算法,它们分别代表了不同的技术路线。 ORB算法基于FAST关键点检测器和BRIEF描述子,它们都经过了优化以提高速度和旋转不变...

    Professional ASP.NET 3.5 SP1 Edition: In C# and VB(part1)

    How to retrieve, update, and delete data quickly and logically using LINQ with side-by-side examples comparing LINQ to existing techniques * Ways to localize your web site in multiple languages ...

    nslations as Manipulation and Rewriting- Comparing the Different Translations-论文.zip

    标题中的“nslations as Manipulation and Rewriting- Comparing the Different Translations”涉及的是翻译研究的一个重要领域,即翻译的操纵与改写,并通过比较不同的翻译版本来探讨这一主题。这篇论文可能深入...

    Comparing Design Patterns in Java and AspectJ

    2. **侵入性**:有些设计模式需要对现有代码进行大量的修改才能实现,这对原有的代码结构可能造成较大的侵扰。 3. **高密度的设计模式降低了代码的可读性**:当一个项目中采用了大量的设计模式时,对于新加入团队的...

    comparing java objects_hashcode_Comparing_

    在`Comparing Java objects with equals and hashcode.pdf`文档中,可能会详细讨论这些方法的实现细节、最佳实践和潜在陷阱,例如: - 如果重写了`equals()`,也应该重写`hashCode()`,以遵循合同约定。 - 当`...

    comparing sloaris to redhat enterprise and AIX.pdf

    2. **资源管理能力**:操作系统需要具备强大的资源管理能力,包括但不限于内存、CPU、存储等。 3. **安全性**:考虑到数据安全的重要性,操作系统必须提供可靠的安全保障措施。 4. **兼容性**:能够支持广泛的应用...

    net energy yield comparing study for Biomass to methane and ethanol

    1. 生物质能转化:生物质作为一种可再生的材料和能源,其转化过程对全球变暖和化石燃料枯竭问题的应对具有重要意义。研究探讨了两种主要的转化方法,即通过发酵过程生产酒精和通过厌氧消化过程生产甲烷。 2. 发酵...

    CANdb++ 3.0 SP27

    CANdb++ 3.0 SP27 最新...Error correction when comparing messages if they are identified by their names. Error correction when exporting databases, if CANdb++ Admin. J1939 is installed under C: \Programs

    Performance Comparing and Analysis for Slot Allocation Model

    1. 标题和描述表明这篇文章主要研究的是“Slot Allocation Model”的性能比较与分析。Slot Allocation Model指的是飞机起降时刻(slot)分配模型,它是机场运营和空中交通管理中的一个关键组成部分。在机场管理中,...

    IR Models\\IR Models\\Comparing Boolean and Probabilistic IR Systems.pdf

    在该模型中,查询被表示为一个由关键词组成的集合,这些关键词之间通过布尔运算符(如AND、OR、NOT等)连接起来。布尔模型的关键特征在于它将文档检索视为一个二值决策问题:文档要么满足查询条件(true),要么不...

Global site tag (gtag.js) - Google Analytics