`
Cash
  • 浏览: 180795 次
  • 性别: Icon_minigender_1
  • 来自: 沈阳
社区版块
存档分类
最新评论

ciscoRV042对接cisco2951,日志

 
阅读更多
在2951上的ike策略10无法与RV042的策略匹配,需要手工指定策略20后问题修复:
crypto isakmp policy 10
authentication pre-share
crypto isakmp policy 20
hash md5
authentication pre-share
lifetime 3600
--------------------------
Aug 7 11:33:29 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 11:33:29 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 11:34:49 2012 Kernel last message repeated 2 times
Aug 7 11:36:09 2012 Kernel last message repeated 2 times
Aug 7 11:37:29 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 11:37:29 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 11:37:32 2012 Connection Accepted ICMP type 8 code 0 172.17.73.102->61.161.193.178 on eth1
Aug 7 11:37:33 2012 Connection Accepted ICMP type 8 code 0 172.17.73.102->61.161.193.178 on eth1
Aug 7 11:37:44 2012 Connection Accepted UDP 172.17.73.102:32771->202.96.64.68:53 on eth1
Aug 7 11:37:44 2012 Connection Accepted ICMP type 8 code 0 172.17.73.102->218.60.32.23 on eth1
Aug 7 11:37:49 2012 Connection Accepted UDP 172.17.73.102:32772->202.96.64.68:53 on eth1
Aug 7 11:37:49 2012 Connection Accepted ICMP type 8 code 0 172.17.73.102->218.60.32.23 on eth1
Aug 7 11:37:50 2012 Connection Accepted ICMP type 8 code 0 172.17.73.102->218.60.32.23 on eth1
Aug 7 11:37:51 2012 Connection Accepted ICMP type 8 code 0 172.17.73.102->218.60.32.23 on eth1
Aug 7 11:38:49 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 11:38:49 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN

Aug 7 11:40:09 2012 Kernel last message repeated 2 times
Aug 7 11:40:54 2012 Connection Accepted UDP 172.17.73.102:32773->202.96.64.68:53 on eth1
Aug 7 11:40:59 2012 Connection Accepted UDP 172.17.73.102:32774->202.96.64.68:53 on eth1
Aug 7 11:40:59 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:51356->74.125.71.106:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:40:59 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:51356->74.125.71.106:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:40:59 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:51356->74.125.71.106:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:41:09 2012 Connection Accepted UDP 172.17.73.102:32776->202.96.64.68:53 on eth1
Aug 7 11:41:09 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:41666->173.194.72.199:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:41:09 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:41666->173.194.72.199:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:41:09 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:41666->173.194.72.199:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:41:10 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 173.194.72.199:80->172.17.73.102:41667 on eth0
Aug 7 11:41:10 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:41668->173.194.72.199:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:41:12 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:41667->173.194.72.199:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:41:12 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:41668->173.194.72.199:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:41:13 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:41670->173.194.72.199:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:41:13 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:41670->173.194.72.199:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:41:13 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:41670->173.194.72.199:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:41:14 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 173.194.72.199:80->172.17.73.102:41670 on eth0
Aug 7 11:41:20 2012 Connection Accepted UDP 172.17.73.102:32778->202.96.64.68:53 on eth1
Aug 7 11:41:20 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:38881->173.194.72.120:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:41:20 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:38881->173.194.72.120:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:41:28 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:41671->173.194.72.199:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:41:28 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 173.194.72.199:80->172.17.73.102:41671 on eth0
Aug 7 11:41:29 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 11:41:29 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 11:41:47 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:41670->173.194.72.199:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:41:47 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:41673->173.194.72.199:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:41:47 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:41673->173.194.72.199:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:41:47 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:41674->173.194.72.199:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:41:48 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:41675->173.194.72.199:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:41:48 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:41675->173.194.72.199:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:41:49 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:41676->173.194.72.199:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:41:49 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:41678->173.194.72.199:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:41:58 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:41679->173.194.72.199:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:42:08 2012 Connection Accepted UDP 172.17.73.102:32780->202.96.64.68:53 on eth1
Aug 7 11:42:09 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:37298->64.156.132.150:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:42:09 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:37298->64.156.132.150:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:42:09 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:37298->64.156.132.150:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:42:12 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:37302->64.156.132.150:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:42:12 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:37300->64.156.132.150:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:42:16 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:37303->64.156.132.150:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:42:17 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:37303->64.156.132.150:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:42:17 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:37302->64.156.132.150:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:42:17 2012 Connection Accepted UDP 172.17.73.102:32787->202.96.64.68:53 on eth1
Aug 7 11:42:17 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:37300->64.156.132.150:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:42:18 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:37301->64.156.132.150:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:42:19 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:37301->64.156.132.150:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:42:21 2012 Connection Accepted UDP 172.17.73.102:32788->202.96.64.68:53 on eth1
Aug 7 11:42:21 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:37304->64.156.132.150:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:42:22 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:37304->64.156.132.150:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:42:22 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:37304->64.156.132.150:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:42:22 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:37304->64.156.132.150:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:42:22 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:37304->64.156.132.150:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:42:24 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:37305->64.156.132.150:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:42:24 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:37305->64.156.132.150:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:42:25 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:37305->64.156.132.150:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:42:27 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:58942->74.113.233.133:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:42:27 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:58942->74.113.233.133:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:42:28 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:59443->66.235.133.11:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:42:28 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:59443->66.235.133.11:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:42:28 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:59443->66.235.133.11:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:42:29 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:59443->66.235.133.11:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:42:29 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:37309->64.156.132.150:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:42:29 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:37305->64.156.132.150:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:42:49 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 11:42:49 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 11:44:09 2012 Kernel last message repeated 2 times
Aug 7 11:45:10 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:51356->74.125.71.106:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:45:29 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:38881->173.194.72.120:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:45:29 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #22: max number of retransmissions (20) reached STATE_MAIN_I1. No response (or no acceptable response) to our first IKE message
Aug 7 11:45:29 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #22: max number of retransmissions (20) reached STATE_MAIN_I1. No response (or no acceptable response) to our first IKE message
Aug 7 11:45:29 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #22: starting keying attempt 2 of an unlimited number
Aug 7 11:45:29 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #23: initiating Main Mode to replace #22
Aug 7 11:45:29 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #23: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>> Initiator Send Main Mode 1st packet
Aug 7 11:45:29 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #23: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>> Initiator Send Main Mode 1st packet
Aug 7 11:45:29 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 11:45:29 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 11:45:50 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:41680->173.194.72.199:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:45:58 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:41679->173.194.72.199:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:46:39 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 11:46:39 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 11:47:59 2012 Kernel last message repeated 2 times
Aug 7 11:48:33 2012 Connection Accepted UDP 172.17.73.102:32791->202.96.64.68:53 on eth1
Aug 7 11:48:38 2012 Connection Accepted UDP 172.17.73.102:32792->202.96.64.68:53 on eth1
Aug 7 11:48:38 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:56950->173.194.72.199:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:48:38 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:56950->173.194.72.199:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:48:38 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:56951->173.194.72.199:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:48:39 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:56951->173.194.72.199:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:48:39 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:56952->173.194.72.199:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:49:19 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 11:49:19 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 11:50:39 2012 Kernel last message repeated 2 times
Aug 7 11:51:59 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 11:51:59 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 11:52:39 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:56951->173.194.72.199:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:52:39 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:56952->173.194.72.199:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:53:19 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 11:53:19 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 11:54:39 2012 Kernel last message repeated 2 times
Aug 7 11:55:59 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 11:57:19 2012 Kernel last message repeated 2 times
Aug 7 11:57:19 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 11:58:39 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #23: max number of retransmissions (20) reached STATE_MAIN_I1. No response (or no acceptable response) to our first IKE message
Aug 7 11:58:39 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #23: max number of retransmissions (20) reached STATE_MAIN_I1. No response (or no acceptable response) to our first IKE message
Aug 7 11:58:39 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #23: starting keying attempt 3 of an unlimited number
Aug 7 11:58:39 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #24: initiating Main Mode to replace #23
Aug 7 11:58:39 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #24: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>> Initiator Send Main Mode 1st packet
Aug 7 11:58:39 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #24: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>> Initiator Send Main Mode 1st packet
Aug 7 11:58:39 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 11:58:39 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 11:59:49 2012 Kernel last message repeated 2 times
Aug 7 12:01:09 2012 Kernel last message repeated 2 times
Aug 7 12:02:29 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 12:03:49 2012 Kernel last message repeated 2 times
Aug 7 12:03:49 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 12:05:09 2012 Kernel last message repeated 2 times
Aug 7 12:06:29 2012 Kernel last message repeated 2 times
Aug 7 12:07:49 2012 Kernel last message repeated 2 times
Aug 7 12:09:09 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 12:09:09 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 12:10:29 2012 Kernel last message repeated 2 times
Aug 7 12:11:49 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #24: max number of retransmissions (20) reached STATE_MAIN_I1. No response (or no acceptable response) to our first IKE message
Aug 7 12:11:49 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #24: max number of retransmissions (20) reached STATE_MAIN_I1. No response (or no acceptable response) to our first IKE message
Aug 7 12:11:49 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #24: starting keying attempt 4 of an unlimited number
Aug 7 12:11:49 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #25: initiating Main Mode to replace #24
Aug 7 12:11:49 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #25: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>> Initiator Send Main Mode 1st packet
Aug 7 12:11:49 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #25: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>> Initiator Send Main Mode 1st packet
Aug 7 12:11:49 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 12:11:49 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 12:12:59 2012 Kernel last message repeated 2 times
Aug 7 12:14:19 2012 Kernel last message repeated 2 times
Aug 7 12:15:39 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 12:15:39 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 12:16:59 2012 Kernel last message repeated 2 times
Aug 7 12:18:19 2012 Kernel last message repeated 2 times
Aug 7 12:19:39 2012 Kernel last message repeated 2 times
Aug 7 12:20:59 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 12:22:19 2012 Kernel last message repeated 2 times
Aug 7 12:22:19 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 12:23:39 2012 Kernel last message repeated 2 times
Aug 7 12:24:59 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #25: max number of retransmissions (20) reached STATE_MAIN_I1. No response (or no acceptable response) to our first IKE message
Aug 7 12:24:59 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #25: max number of retransmissions (20) reached STATE_MAIN_I1. No response (or no acceptable response) to our first IKE message
Aug 7 12:24:59 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #25: starting keying attempt 5 of an unlimited number
Aug 7 12:24:59 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #26: initiating Main Mode to replace #25
Aug 7 12:24:59 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #26: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>> Initiator Send Main Mode 1st packet
Aug 7 12:24:59 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #26: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>> Initiator Send Main Mode 1st packet
Aug 7 12:24:59 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 12:24:59 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 12:26:09 2012 Kernel last message repeated 2 times
Aug 7 12:27:29 2012 Kernel last message repeated 2 times
Aug 7 12:28:49 2012 Kernel last message repeated 2 times
Aug 7 12:30:09 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 12:30:09 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 12:31:29 2012 Kernel last message repeated 2 times
Aug 7 12:32:49 2012 Kernel last message repeated 2 times
Aug 7 12:34:09 2012 Kernel last message repeated 2 times
Aug 7 12:35:29 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 12:36:49 2012 Kernel last message repeated 2 times
Aug 7 12:36:49 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 12:38:09 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #26: max number of retransmissions (20) reached STATE_MAIN_I1. No response (or no acceptable response) to our first IKE message
Aug 7 12:38:09 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #26: max number of retransmissions (20) reached STATE_MAIN_I1. No response (or no acceptable response) to our first IKE message
Aug 7 12:38:09 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #26: starting keying attempt 6 of an unlimited number
Aug 7 12:38:09 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #27: initiating Main Mode to replace #26
Aug 7 12:38:09 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #27: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>> Initiator Send Main Mode 1st packet
Aug 7 12:38:09 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #27: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>> Initiator Send Main Mode 1st packet
Aug 7 12:38:09 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 12:38:09 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 12:39:19 2012 Kernel last message repeated 2 times
Aug 7 12:40:39 2012 Kernel last message repeated 2 times
Aug 7 12:41:59 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 12:43:19 2012 Kernel last message repeated 2 times
Aug 7 12:43:19 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 12:44:39 2012 Kernel last message repeated 2 times
Aug 7 12:45:59 2012 Kernel last message repeated 2 times
Aug 7 12:46:56 2012 Connection Accepted UDP 172.17.73.102:32793->202.96.64.68:53 on eth1
Aug 7 12:47:19 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 12:47:19 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 12:48:39 2012 Kernel last message repeated 2 times
Aug 7 12:49:59 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 12:49:59 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 12:51:19 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #27: max number of retransmissions (20) reached STATE_MAIN_I1. No response (or no acceptable response) to our first IKE message
Aug 7 12:51:19 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #27: max number of retransmissions (20) reached STATE_MAIN_I1. No response (or no acceptable response) to our first IKE message
Aug 7 12:51:19 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #27: starting keying attempt 7 of an unlimited number
Aug 7 12:51:19 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #28: initiating Main Mode to replace #27
Aug 7 12:51:19 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #28: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>> Initiator Send Main Mode 1st packet
Aug 7 12:51:19 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #28: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>> Initiator Send Main Mode 1st packet
Aug 7 12:51:19 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 12:51:19 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 12:52:29 2012 Kernel last message repeated 2 times
Aug 7 12:53:49 2012 Kernel last message repeated 2 times
Aug 7 12:55:09 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 12:55:09 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 12:55:59 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0): deleting connection
Aug 7 12:55:59 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #28: deleting state (STATE_MAIN_I1)
Aug 7 12:55:59 2012 VPN Log added connection description (g2gips0)
Aug 7 12:55:59 2012 VPN Log listening for IKE messages
Aug 7 12:55:59 2012 VPN Log forgetting secrets
Aug 7 12:55:59 2012 VPN Log loading secrets from '/etc/ipsec.d/ipsec.secrets'
Aug 7 12:55:59 2012 System Log gateway_to_gateway.htm is changed.
Aug 7 12:56:53 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #29: initiating Main Mode
Aug 7 12:56:53 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #29: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>> Initiator Send Main Mode 1st packet
Aug 7 12:56:53 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #29: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>> Initiator Send Main Mode 1st packet
Aug 7 12:56:53 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #29: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] <<< Initiator Received Main Mode 2nd packet
Aug 7 12:56:53 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #29: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] <<< Initiator Received Main Mode 2nd packet
Aug 7 12:56:53 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #29: You should NOT use insecure IKE algorithms (OAKLEY_DES_CBC)!
Aug 7 12:56:53 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #29: You should NOT use insecure IKE algorithms (OAKLEY_DES_CBC)!
Aug 7 12:56:53 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #29: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>> Initiator send Main Mode 3rd packet
Aug 7 12:56:53 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #29: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>> Initiator send Main Mode 3rd packet
Aug 7 12:56:53 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #29: ignoring Vendor ID payload [Cisco-Unity]
Aug 7 12:56:55 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #29: ignoring Vendor ID payload [Cisco-Unity]
Aug 7 12:56:55 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #29: received Vendor ID payload [Dead Peer Detection]
Aug 7 12:56:55 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #29: received Vendor ID payload [Dead Peer Detection]
Aug 7 12:56:55 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #29: ignoring Vendor ID payload [1a6558a465b156e0c441fb9576270297]
Aug 7 12:56:55 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #29: ignoring Vendor ID payload [1a6558a465b156e0c441fb9576270297]
Aug 7 12:56:55 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #29: ignoring Vendor ID payload [XAUTH]
Aug 7 12:56:55 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #29: ignoring Vendor ID payload [XAUTH]
Aug 7 12:56:55 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #29: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] <<< Initiator Received Main Mode 4th packet
Aug 7 12:56:55 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #29: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] <<< Initiator Received Main Mode 4th packet
Aug 7 12:56:55 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #29: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>> Initiator Send Main Mode 5th packet
Aug 7 12:56:55 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #29: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>> Initiator Send Main Mode 5th packet
Aug 7 12:56:55 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #29: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>> Initiator Receive Main Mode 6th packet
Aug 7 12:56:55 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #29: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>> Initiator Receive Main Mode 6th packet
Aug 7 12:56:55 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #29: Peer ID is ID_IPV4_ADDR: '61.161.193.178'
Aug 7 12:56:55 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #29: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] Main Mode Phase 1 SA Established
Aug 7 12:56:55 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #29: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] Main Mode Phase 1 SA Established
Aug 7 12:56:55 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #29: ISAKMP SA established
Aug 7 12:56:55 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #30: initiating Quick Mode PSK+ENCRYPT+TUNNEL+PFS {using isakmp#29}
Aug 7 12:56:55 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #30: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>> Initiator send Quick Mode 1st packet
Aug 7 12:56:55 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #30: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>> Initiator send Quick Mode 1st packet
Aug 7 12:56:55 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #30: ignoring informational payload, type IPSEC_RESPONDER_LIFETIME
Aug 7 12:56:55 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #30: ignoring informational payload, type IPSEC_RESPONDER_LIFETIME
Aug 7 12:56:55 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #30: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] <<< Initiator Received Quick Mode 2nd packet
Aug 7 12:56:55 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #30: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] <<< Initiator Received Quick Mode 2nd packet
Aug 7 12:56:55 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #30: esp_ealg_id=2-2,esp_ealg_keylen=0, key_len=64,esp_aalg_id=1-1.
Aug 7 12:56:55 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #30: esp_ealg_id=2-2,esp_ealg_keylen=0, key_len=64,esp_aalg_id=1-1.
Aug 7 12:56:55 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #30: You should NOT use insecure ESP algorithms [ESP_DES (64)]!
Aug 7 12:56:55 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #30: You should NOT use insecure ESP algorithms [ESP_DES (64)]!
Aug 7 12:56:55 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #30: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] Inbound SPI value = 3a2db126
Aug 7 12:56:55 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #30: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] Inbound SPI value = 3a2db126
Aug 7 12:56:55 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #30: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] Outbound SPI value = b511d744
Aug 7 12:56:55 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #30: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] Outbound SPI value = b511d744
Aug 7 12:56:55 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #30: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>> Initiator Send Quick Mode 3rd packet
Aug 7 12:56:55 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #30: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>> Initiator Send Quick Mode 3rd packet
Aug 7 12:56:55 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #30: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] Quick Mode Phase 2 SA Established, IPSec Tunnel Connected
Aug 7 12:56:55 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #30: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] Quick Mode Phase 2 SA Established, IPSec Tunnel Connected
Aug 7 12:56:55 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #30: sent QI2, IPsec SA established {ESP=>0xb511d744 <0x3a2db126
分享到:
评论

相关推荐

    CiscoRV180W使用手册1.pdf

    CiscoRV180W使用手册1.pdf

    ciscoRV120W设置DMZ访问[收集].pdf

    ciscoRV120W设置DMZ访问[收集].pdf

    【9493】基于springboot+vue的美食信息推荐系统的设计与实现.zip

    技术选型 【后端】:Java 【框架】:springboot 【前端】:vue 【JDK版本】:JDK1.8 【服务器】:tomcat7+ 【数据库】:mysql 5.7+ 项目包含前后台完整源码。 项目都经过严格调试,确保可以运行! 具体项目介绍可查看博主文章或私聊获取 助力学习实践,提升编程技能,快来获取这份宝贵的资源吧! 在当今快速发展的信息技术领域,技术选型是决定一个项目成功与否的重要因素之一。基于以下的技术栈,我们为您带来了一份完善且经过实践验证的项目资源,让您在学习和提升编程技能的道路上事半功倍。以下是该项目的技术选型和其组件的详细介绍。 在后端技术方面,我们选择了Java作为编程语言。Java以其稳健性、跨平台性和丰富的库支持,在企业级应用中处于领导地位。项目采用了流行的Spring Boot框架,这个框架以简化Java企业级开发而闻名。Spring Boot提供了简洁的配置方式、内置的嵌入式服务器支持以及强大的生态系统,使开发者能够更高效地构建和部署应用。 前端技术方面,我们使用了Vue.js,这是一个用于构建用户界面的渐进式JavaScript框架。Vue以其易上手、灵活和性能出色而受到开发者的青睐,它的组件化开发思想也有助于提高代码的复用性和可维护性。 项目的编译和运行环境选择了JDK 1.8。尽管Java已经推出了更新的版本,但JDK 1.8依旧是一种成熟且稳定的选择,广泛应用于各类项目中,确保了兼容性和稳定性。 在服务器方面,本项目部署在Tomcat 7+之上。Tomcat是Apache软件基金会下的一个开源Servlet容器,也是应用最为广泛的Java Web服务器之一。其稳定性和可靠的性能表现为Java Web应用提供了坚实的支持。 数据库方面,我们采用了MySQL 5.7+。MySQL是一种高效、可靠且使用广泛的关系型数据库管理系统,5.7版本在性能和功能上都有显著的提升。 值得一提的是,该项目包含了前后台的完整源码,并经过严格调试,确保可以顺利运行。通过项目的学习和实践,您将能更好地掌握从后端到前端的完整开发流程,提升自己的编程技能。欢迎参考博主的详细文章或私信获取更多信息,利用这一宝贵资源来推进您的技术成长之路!

    (源码)基于Spring、Struts和Hibernate的OA系统.zip

    # 基于Spring、Struts和Hibernate的OA系统 ## 项目简介 本项目是一个基于Spring、Struts和Hibernate框架的办公自动化(OA)系统。该系统主要用于企业内部的日常办公管理,包括用户登录、组织管理、权限管理等功能。系统前端使用现成的模板和JavaScript、jQuery技术,后端通过Struts、Hibernate和Spring框架实现业务逻辑和数据持久化。 ## 项目的主要特性和功能 ### 登录模块 防止多设备登录系统能够检测到同一账号在不同设备上的登录情况,并在检测到异地登录时通知用户并强制下线。 WebSocket支持使用WebSocket技术实现实时通知功能。 ### 组织管理模块 部门管理支持部门的增删改查操作,包括查看部门信息、职位信息和员工数量。 用户管理支持用户的增删改查操作,包括指定用户所在部门、职位和角色。 角色管理支持角色的增删改查操作,包括查看角色权限和修改角色权限。

    基于MySQL、express框架、Vue3的光谷智慧交通系统源码+数据库+文档说明(高分项目)

    基于MySQL、express框架、Vue3的光谷智慧交通系统源码+数据库+文档说明(高分项目),该项目是个人毕设项目,答辩评审分达到98分,代码都经过调试测试,确保可以运行!欢迎下载使用,可用于小白学习、进阶。该资源主要针对计算机、通信、人工智能、自动化等相关专业的学生、老师或从业者下载使用,亦可作为期末课程设计、课程大作业、毕业设计等。项目整体具有较高的学习借鉴价值!基础能力强的可以在此基础上修改调整,以实现不同的功能。 基于MySQL、express框架、Vue3的光谷智慧交通系统源码+数据库+文档说明(高分项目)基于MySQL、express框架、Vue3的光谷智慧交通系统源码+数据库+文档说明(高分项目)基于MySQL、express框架、Vue3的光谷智慧交通系统源码+数据库+文档说明(高分项目)基于MySQL、express框架、Vue3的光谷智慧交通系统源码+数据库+文档说明(高分项目)基于MySQL、express框架、Vue3的光谷智慧交通系统源码+数据库+文档说明(高分项目)基于MySQL、express框架、Vue3的光谷智慧交通系统源码+数据库+文档说明(高

    open3d python 给点云每个点设置不同的颜色

    open3d python 给点云每个点设置不同的颜色

    【电磁】基于matlab具有Mur吸收边界的区域的二维FDTD【含Matlab源码 9136期】.mp4

    Matlab领域上传的视频均有对应的完整代码,皆可运行,亲测可用,适合小白; 1、代码压缩包内容 主函数:main.m; 调用函数:其他m文件;无需运行 运行结果效果图; 2、代码运行版本 Matlab 2019b;若运行有误,根据提示修改;若不会,私信博主; 3、运行操作步骤 步骤一:将所有文件放到Matlab的当前文件夹中; 步骤二:双击打开main.m文件; 步骤三:点击运行,等程序运行完得到结果; 4、仿真咨询 如需其他服务,可私信博主; 4.1 博客或资源的完整代码提供 4.2 期刊或参考文献复现 4.3 Matlab程序定制 4.4 科研合作

    HengCe-18900-2024-2030中国室内木门市场现状研究分析与发展前景预测报告-样本.docx

    HengCe-18900-2024-2030中国室内木门市场现状研究分析与发展前景预测报告-样本.docx

    (源码)基于ASP.NET Web API的供应链管理系统.zip

    # 基于ASP.NET Web API的供应链管理系统 ## 项目简介 供应链管理系统(SCM)是一个基于ASP.NET Web API框架开发的企业级应用,旨在帮助企业高效管理供应链中的各个环节。系统涵盖了供应商管理、采购管理、库存管理、订单管理等多个模块,通过API接口实现数据的增删改查操作,确保供应链的顺畅运作。 ## 项目的主要特性和功能 1. 供应商管理 供应商信息的增删改查操作。 供应商联系人管理。 供应商评级和分类管理。 2. 采购管理 采购订单的创建、编辑和删除。 采购产品的状态管理。 采购合同的生成和管理。 3. 库存管理 库存产品的入库和出库管理。 库存状态的实时监控。 4. 订单管理 订单的创建、编辑和删除。 订单状态的跟踪和管理。 5. 用户管理 用户登录和权限管理。 用户角色的分配和管理。

    基于SpringBoot的“学生考勤管理系统”的设计与实现(源码+数据库+文档+PPT).zip

    系统主要包括首页,个人中心,学生管理,教师管理,班级信息管理,课程信息管理,签到信息管理,考勤信息管理,请假信息管理,考勤统计管理等功能模块。

    维特协议标准精度示例程序c.zip

    c语言

    DICOM文件+DX放射平片-数字X射线图像DICOM测试文件

    DICOM文件+DX放射平片—数字X射线图像DICOM测试文件,文件为.dcm类型DICOM图像文件文件,仅供需要了解DICOM或相关DICOM开发的技术人员当作测试数据或研究使用,请勿用于非法用途。

    C#ASP.NET仓储管理系统源码数据库 SQL2008源码类型 WebForm

    ASP.NET仓储管理系统源码 一、 程序说明 该程序大部分使用于生产制造厂,其中结合了制造厂的采购,销售,生产等. 开源部分是仓库系统后台管理系 统, 在给客户实施的过程中利用到了很多硬件设备, 设计到Wince系统,Android系统等PDA设备,各种打印 机,条码打印机,感应设备等,而且这些可能在整个项目中占据主导,而后台管理系统只是辅助作用的。 该程序使用的.NET MVC开发,大量使用到了jQuery,以及Bootstrap。 数据库使用了SQL Server.

    【小程序毕业设计】面向文艺影视社群的微信小程序源码(完整前后端+mysql+说明文档).zip

    环境说明: 开发语言:Java/php JDK版本:JDK1.8 数据库:mysql 5.7及以上 数据库工具:Navicat11及以上 开发软件:eclipse/idea 小程序框架:uniapp/原生小程序 开发工具:HBuilder X/微信开发者

    Skia-macOS-Release-arm64.zip

    Skia-macOS-Release-arm64.zip aseprite 安装所需依赖安装包

    中国品牌日研究特辑-数字经济时代下中国品牌高质量发展之用户趋势.pdf

    中国品牌日研究特辑-数字经济时代下中国品牌高质量发展之用户趋势.pdf

    生成xcinsphfs0exefsromfscertifateticket转储从任天堂Switch游戏卡和安装的SDe.zip

    c语言

    一个基于qt开发的包含各种基础图像处理技术的桌面应用,图像处理算法基于halcon,有直接调用halcon脚本和执行halcon

    一个基于qt开发的包含各种基础图像处理技术的桌面应用,图像处理算法基于halcon,有直接调用halcon脚本和执行halcon C++代码方式。 导入图片,预处理,滤波,边缘检测,阈值分割,形态学变换,图像增强,图像变换,

    【9312】基于Springboot+vue的精品水果线上销售网站的设计与实现.zip

    技术选型 【后端】:Java 【框架】:springboot 【前端】:vue 【JDK版本】:JDK1.8 【服务器】:tomcat7+ 【数据库】:mysql 5.7+ 项目包含前后台完整源码。 项目都经过严格调试,确保可以运行! 具体项目介绍可查看博主文章或私聊获取 助力学习实践,提升编程技能,快来获取这份宝贵的资源吧! 在当今快速发展的信息技术领域,技术选型是决定一个项目成功与否的重要因素之一。基于以下的技术栈,我们为您带来了一份完善且经过实践验证的项目资源,让您在学习和提升编程技能的道路上事半功倍。以下是该项目的技术选型和其组件的详细介绍。 在后端技术方面,我们选择了Java作为编程语言。Java以其稳健性、跨平台性和丰富的库支持,在企业级应用中处于领导地位。项目采用了流行的Spring Boot框架,这个框架以简化Java企业级开发而闻名。Spring Boot提供了简洁的配置方式、内置的嵌入式服务器支持以及强大的生态系统,使开发者能够更高效地构建和部署应用。 前端技术方面,我们使用了Vue.js,这是一个用于构建用户界面的渐进式JavaScript框架。Vue以其易上手、灵活和性能出色而受到开发者的青睐,它的组件化开发思想也有助于提高代码的复用性和可维护性。 项目的编译和运行环境选择了JDK 1.8。尽管Java已经推出了更新的版本,但JDK 1.8依旧是一种成熟且稳定的选择,广泛应用于各类项目中,确保了兼容性和稳定性。 在服务器方面,本项目部署在Tomcat 7+之上。Tomcat是Apache软件基金会下的一个开源Servlet容器,也是应用最为广泛的Java Web服务器之一。其稳定性和可靠的性能表现为Java Web应用提供了坚实的支持。 数据库方面,我们采用了MySQL 5.7+。MySQL是一种高效、可靠且使用广泛的关系型数据库管理系统,5.7版本在性能和功能上都有显著的提升。 值得一提的是,该项目包含了前后台的完整源码,并经过严格调试,确保可以顺利运行。通过项目的学习和实践,您将能更好地掌握从后端到前端的完整开发流程,提升自己的编程技能。欢迎参考博主的详细文章或私信获取更多信息,利用这一宝贵资源来推进您的技术成长之路!

    C#固定资产管理系统源码(带条码打印)数据库 SQL2008源码类型 WinForm

    固定资产管理系统源码(带条码打印) 功能介绍 1.基本信息管理:包括资产分类,基本资料,资产编号规则,保存列间距和选择资产显示列等功能; 2.固定资产管理:包括资产增加,资产更新,资产删除,资产清理,资产清理查询和资产折旧核算 3.数据维护管理:包系统数据初始化,系统数据备份/恢复等功能; 4.系统维护管理:包括本单位信息和操作员管理等功能; 5.系统辅助工具:包括计算器和记事本等功能; 6.条码打印:对条码进行打印等功能;

Global site tag (gtag.js) - Google Analytics