- 浏览: 11270 次
- 性别:
- 来自: 体育仓库
最新评论
-
ravenex:
chong_zh 写道例子中的Cindy,Mom,Grandm ...
谁是initiating loader -
chong_zh:
例子中的Cindy,Mom,Grandma并没有载入委派关系, ...
谁是initiating loader -
beyondqinghua:
有时间慢慢看,收藏先!
几种排序算法的对比
引用
Programming: The Birthday Paradox
There's a parlor trick known as the Birthday Paradox where in any group of 23 or more people, chances are more than 50% that some two people have the same birthday. This is counter-intuitive to statistical lay people, but can be proven mathematically. Still, certain lay people have been known to be suspicious of math (but rather trusting of computers), so one thing we can do is gather empirical evidence -- simulate gatherings of people with randomly-assigned birthdays and test how often two people end up with the same birthday. We'd also like to vary the problem a bit to see what effect differently-sized calendars and group sizes have on the result.
Your simulation should work like this:
1. Take from the user two numbers: D, a calendar length (in days), and N, a number of trials.
2. Picks random birthdays for G=2 guests.
3. Test to see if any of the 2 guests share a birthday with another of the 2 guests. If so, the program remembers a "hit."
4. Repeat steps 2 and 3 until the requested number of trials is met.
5. Report the percentage of trials that reported hits, that is, the proportion of simulated parties where the some two guests shared a birthday.
6. Repeat steps 2, 3, 4, and 5 for parties of 3, 4, 5 ... 100 guests.
Test your program on a few calendar lengths, as small as 2 days and as large as 1000 days. If your program works correctly, you should find that the percentage of hits exceeds .5 for N=365 when G=23.
Your program should take the two variables, D and T, on the command line. Be sure to check that they are valid (both should be integers of at least 2).
In your README, answer the following questions (in addition to the usual README content):
1. How did you implement your program? What loops did you use, where, for what purpose? What data structures did you use to store your information?
2. What were your results for D=2, 10, 100, 500, and 1000? Did they match up with your expectations?
3. What happens to your results when you vary the number of trials? How many trials are "enough" for results to converge?
4. Based on your answer to #1, how long does your program take? Give Big-Oh, Omega-Oh, and, if applicable, Theta-Oh terms as a function of D, G and T.
Example Output
There's a parlor trick known as the Birthday Paradox where in any group of 23 or more people, chances are more than 50% that some two people have the same birthday. This is counter-intuitive to statistical lay people, but can be proven mathematically. Still, certain lay people have been known to be suspicious of math (but rather trusting of computers), so one thing we can do is gather empirical evidence -- simulate gatherings of people with randomly-assigned birthdays and test how often two people end up with the same birthday. We'd also like to vary the problem a bit to see what effect differently-sized calendars and group sizes have on the result.
Your simulation should work like this:
1. Take from the user two numbers: D, a calendar length (in days), and N, a number of trials.
2. Picks random birthdays for G=2 guests.
3. Test to see if any of the 2 guests share a birthday with another of the 2 guests. If so, the program remembers a "hit."
4. Repeat steps 2 and 3 until the requested number of trials is met.
5. Report the percentage of trials that reported hits, that is, the proportion of simulated parties where the some two guests shared a birthday.
6. Repeat steps 2, 3, 4, and 5 for parties of 3, 4, 5 ... 100 guests.
Test your program on a few calendar lengths, as small as 2 days and as large as 1000 days. If your program works correctly, you should find that the percentage of hits exceeds .5 for N=365 when G=23.
Your program should take the two variables, D and T, on the command line. Be sure to check that they are valid (both should be integers of at least 2).
In your README, answer the following questions (in addition to the usual README content):
1. How did you implement your program? What loops did you use, where, for what purpose? What data structures did you use to store your information?
2. What were your results for D=2, 10, 100, 500, and 1000? Did they match up with your expectations?
3. What happens to your results when you vary the number of trials? How many trials are "enough" for results to converge?
4. Based on your answer to #1, how long does your program take? Give Big-Oh, Omega-Oh, and, if applicable, Theta-Oh terms as a function of D, G and T.
Example Output
$ java BirthdaySim 200 1000 2 guests: [0.0050]: 5 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 3 guests: [0.017]: 17 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 4 guests: [0.024]: 24 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 5 guests: [0.057]: 57 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 6 guests: [0.06]: 60 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 7 guests: [0.09]: 90 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 8 guests: [0.134]: 134 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 9 guests: [0.158]: 158 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 10 guests: [0.213]: 213 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 11 guests: [0.227]: 227 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 12 guests: [0.291]: 291 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 13 guests: [0.322]: 322 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 14 guests: [0.352]: 352 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 15 guests: [0.415]: 415 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 16 guests: [0.454]: 454 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 17 guests: [0.487]: 487 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 18 guests: [0.532]: 532 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 19 guests: [0.595]: 595 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 20 guests: [0.609]: 609 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 21 guests: [0.62]: 620 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 22 guests: [0.664]: 664 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 23 guests: [0.73]: 730 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 24 guests: [0.775]: 775 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 25 guests: [0.807]: 807 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 26 guests: [0.831]: 831 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 27 guests: [0.857]: 857 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 28 guests: [0.855]: 855 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 29 guests: [0.875]: 875 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 30 guests: [0.893]: 893 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 31 guests: [0.927]: 927 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 32 guests: [0.93]: 930 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 33 guests: [0.943]: 943 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 34 guests: [0.963]: 963 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 35 guests: [0.942]: 942 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 36 guests: [0.962]: 962 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 37 guests: [0.972]: 972 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 38 guests: [0.978]: 978 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 39 guests: [0.979]: 979 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 40 guests: [0.982]: 982 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 41 guests: [0.986]: 986 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 42 guests: [0.988]: 988 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 43 guests: [0.996]: 996 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 44 guests: [0.997]: 997 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 45 guests: [0.999]: 999 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 46 guests: [0.995]: 995 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 47 guests: [0.998]: 998 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 48 guests: [0.997]: 997 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 49 guests: [0.998]: 998 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 50 guests: [0.999]: 999 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 51 guests: [1.0]: 1000 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 52 guests: [0.998]: 998 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 53 guests: [1.0]: 1000 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 54 guests: [1.0]: 1000 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 55 guests: [0.999]: 999 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 56 guests: [1.0]: 1000 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 57 guests: [1.0]: 1000 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 58 guests: [1.0]: 1000 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 59 guests: [1.0]: 1000 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 60 guests: [0.999]: 999 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 61 guests: [1.0]: 1000 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 62 guests: [1.0]: 1000 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 63 guests: [1.0]: 1000 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 64 guests: [1.0]: 1000 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 65 guests: [1.0]: 1000 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 66 guests: [1.0]: 1000 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 67 guests: [1.0]: 1000 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 68 guests: [1.0]: 1000 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 69 guests: [1.0]: 1000 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 70 guests: [1.0]: 1000 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 71 guests: [1.0]: 1000 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 72 guests: [1.0]: 1000 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 73 guests: [1.0]: 1000 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 74 guests: [1.0]: 1000 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 75 guests: [1.0]: 1000 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 76 guests: [1.0]: 1000 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 77 guests: [1.0]: 1000 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 78 guests: [1.0]: 1000 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 79 guests: [1.0]: 1000 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 80 guests: [1.0]: 1000 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 81 guests: [1.0]: 1000 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 82 guests: [1.0]: 1000 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 83 guests: [1.0]: 1000 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 84 guests: [1.0]: 1000 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 85 guests: [1.0]: 1000 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 86 guests: [1.0]: 1000 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 87 guests: [1.0]: 1000 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 88 guests: [1.0]: 1000 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 89 guests: [1.0]: 1000 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 90 guests: [1.0]: 1000 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 91 guests: [1.0]: 1000 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 92 guests: [1.0]: 1000 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 93 guests: [1.0]: 1000 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 94 guests: [1.0]: 1000 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 95 guests: [1.0]: 1000 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 96 guests: [1.0]: 1000 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 97 guests: [1.0]: 1000 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 98 guests: [1.0]: 1000 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 99 guests: [1.0]: 1000 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday 100 guests: [1.0]: 1000 time(s) out of 1000, two guests had the same birthday
BirthdaySim.java:
/* * BirthdaySim.java * ver 0.0.0.1, Jan 30, 2008 */ public class BirthdaySim { /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// // Static fields /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// private static int D; private static int T; /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// // Constants /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// private static final int MIN_GUESTS = 2; private static final int MAX_GUESTS = 100; private static final String USAGE = "Usage: java BirthdaySim daysOfCalendar numberOfTrials"; /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// // Program entry point /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// /** * @param args Command line parameters. * Usage: java BirthdaySim daysOfCalendar numberOfTrials */ public static void main( String[ ] args ) { try { processCommandLine( args ); runTrials( D, T ); } catch ( NumberFormatException nfe ) { System.err.println( "Invalid number format: " + nfe.getMessage( ) ); usage( ); } catch ( Exception e ) { System.err.println( e.getMessage( ) ); usage( ); } } /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// // Helper methods /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// private static void processCommandLine( String[ ] args ) throws Exception { if ( args.length > 2 ) throw new Exception( "Too many arguments." ); if ( args.length < 2 ) throw new Exception( "Too little arguments." ); D = Integer.parseInt( args[ 0 ] ); T = Integer.parseInt( args[ 1 ] ); } private static void usage() { System.out.println( USAGE ); } static void runTrials( int d, int t ) { for ( int i = MIN_GUESTS; i <= MAX_GUESTS; ++i ) { Simulator sim = new Simulator( d, t, i ); System.out.println( sim ); } } }
Simulator.java:
/* * Simulator.java * ver 0.0.0.1, Jan 30, 2008 */ import java.util.Arrays; import java.util.Random; /** * Implementation of birthday problem. */ public class Simulator { ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// // Private fields /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// private int[ ] guest; private int daysOfCalendar; private int numberOfTrials; private int hitCount; private boolean isCalculated; /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// // Constructors /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// public Simulator( int daysOfCalendar, int numberOfTrials, int numberOfGuests ) { this.guest = new int[ numberOfGuests ]; this.daysOfCalendar = daysOfCalendar; this.numberOfTrials = numberOfTrials; this.setCalculated( false ); } /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// // Methods /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// protected void initialize( ) { Random random = new Random( ); // initialize guest array // Theta(n), where n = this.guest.length (?) for ( int i = 0; i < this.guest.length; ++i ) { this.guest[ i ] = random.nextInt( this.getDaysOfCalendar( ) ); } // sort guest array with Java's tuned quicksort // implementation in standard library. // this is an O(n^2) and Omega(n*log(n)) algorithm, // where n = this.guest.length Arrays.sort( this.guest ); } public void runTrials( ) { this.hitCount = 0; // run trials for T times for ( int i = 0; i < this.getNumberOfTrials( ); ++i ) { this.initialize( ); this.hitCount = ( this.isHit( ) ) ? this.hitCount + 1 : this.hitCount; } this.setCalculated( true ); } private boolean isHit( ) { int lastNumber = this.guest[ 0 ]; // do a linear search for duplicate occurences // Theta(n), where n = this.guest.length (?) for ( int i = 1; i < this.guest.length; ++i ) { if ( lastNumber == this.guest[ i ] ) { return true; } else { lastNumber = this.guest[ i ]; } } return false; } /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// // Overridden methods /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// @Override public String toString( ) { if ( !this.isCalculated( ) ) { this.runTrials( ); } StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder( ); sb.append( this.getNumberOfGuests( ) ); sb.append( " guests: [" ); sb.append( this.getProbability( ) ); sb.append( "]: " ); sb.append( this.getHitCount( ) ); sb.append( " time(s) out of " ); sb.append( this.getNumberOfTrials( ) ); sb.append( ", two guests had the same birthday" ); return sb.toString( ); } /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// // Getter/Setter methods /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// public int getNumberOfGuests( ) { return this.guest.length; } public void setNumberOfGuests( int numberOfGuests ) { this.guest = new int[ numberOfGuests ]; this.setCalculated( false ); } public int getDaysOfCalendar( ) { return this.daysOfCalendar; } public void setDaysOfCalendar( int daysOfCalendar ) { this.daysOfCalendar = daysOfCalendar; this.setCalculated( false ); } public int getNumberOfTrials( ) { return this.numberOfTrials; } public void setNumberOfTrials( int numberOfTrials ) { this.numberOfTrials = numberOfTrials; this.setCalculated( false ); } public int getHitCount( ) { return hitCount; } public double getProbability( ) { if ( !this.isCalculated( ) ) { this.runTrials( ); } return this.hitCount / ( double ) this.numberOfTrials; } private boolean isCalculated( ) { return this.isCalculated; } private void setCalculated( boolean isCalculated ) { this.isCalculated = isCalculated; if ( !this.isCalculated ) { this.hitCount = -1; } } /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// // main, for testing purpose only /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// public static void main( String[ ] args ) { Simulator sim = new Simulator( 200, 1000, 23 ); System.out.println( sim ); } }
相关推荐
在实际运行这段代码后,你会发现,随着模拟次数的增加,至少有两个人生日相同的概率趋于稳定在50%左右,这与生日悖论的理论预测相吻合。 Python通过其强大的数据结构和随机数生成能力,使得我们可以轻松地模拟和...
#### 1.3 生日悖论模拟 - **背景**:通过模拟实验探讨生日悖论,即在一群随机选取的人中至少两个人生日相同的概率问题。 - **实现方法**: - **随机生日生成**:使用随机数生成函数模拟随机生日。 - **比较生日**...
生日悖论,也被称为生日问题,是一个在统计学中经常被提及的概念,它涉及到计算在一组随机选取的人中,至少有两人拥有相同生日的概率。这个概率比直觉上要高得多,通常在23人时,这个概率就已经超过了50%。在MATLAB...
从引起逻辑矛盾的角度来说生日悖论并不是一种悖论,从这个数学事实与一般直觉相抵触的意义上,它才称得上是一个悖论。大多数人会认为,23人中有2人生日相同的概率应该远远小于50%。计算与此相关的概率被称为生日问题...
这个实例旨在帮助开发者掌握如何在VB环境中实现这些功能,同时理解生日悖论的基本概念。 生日悖论是一个概率理论,它指出在一个房间里,只需要大约23人,就有可能有两个人的生日是同一天。在VB中,我们可以模拟这个...
这个问题通常被称为“生日悖论”,因为直觉上人们往往低估了这个概率。 生日悖论的核心是理解在365天的一年中,如果有n个人,他们生日都不相同的概率是如何随n变化的。首先,第一个人的生日可以是任何一天,所以...
在本项目"matlab开发-Birthdayprobabilitysolution"中,我们主要关注的是著名的“生日悖论”问题,这是一个概率论的经典问题。在这个问题中,我们探讨的是在一个房间里需要多少人,才能使得至少有两个人的生日相同的...
通过公式计算和模拟计算两种方法,理解并验证了“生日悖论”的概念,即在一个小群体中找到共享生日的概率比直觉上更高。 2. **随机游走曲线**:练习6_02涉及到随机数生成和随机游走理论,通过在每个随机间隔点上生成...
- **生日问题**:一家三口中恰好仅有两人生日在同一天的概率涉及概率论中的经典问题——生日悖论。这个问题展示了在有限样本空间中,事件发生的概率可能与直观感受大相径庭。 ### 阅读程序写结果 - **C++编程**:...
- **生日悖论**是一个著名的概率问题,描述了一群人中至少两人拥有相同生日的概率。在一个家庭中恰好仅有两个人生日相同的概率可以通过计算所有可能情况的总数与符合条件的情况数之比来得出。假设每年都是365天,这...
标题中的“生日:计算生日问题的真实价值”指向的是一个经典的概率问题,通常称为“生日悖论”或“生日问题”。这个问题探讨的是在一个房间里需要多少人,才有可能出现至少两个人有相同的生日。这个问题揭示了概率在...
"birthday-problem-test"项目就是这样一个针对PRNG测试的实现,它利用了著名的“生日悖论”来评估PRNG的质量。 生日悖论,通常被用来解释在较小群体中出现生日重复的概率,其实质是概率论中的一个经典问题。在该...
19. 必然事件的识别,生日悖论、概率的基本性质、物理常识和交换律的应用。 20. “80%的机会获胜”通常意味着可能性较大但不是绝对。 填空题部分可能涉及圆的半径、直线与圆的位置关系等相关知识点,具体解答需要...
11. 集合论基础:第11题涉及生日悖论,至少有多少人同月出生,考察了集合论的初步概念。 12. 抽屉原理:第12题通过保证取出相同颜色的球的数量,引入了抽屉原理,这是解决概率问题的一个基本工具。 13. 图形放大与...
4. 概率:题6和题7涉及到概率的概念,比如彩票中奖的概率和生日悖论的应用,强调了抽样调查和概率的理解。 5. 几何图形的性质:题13询问了矩形纸片上画两个外切圆所需的最小面积,涉及几何优化问题。 6. 坐标几何...
接着,我们遇到了“生日悖论”。这个问题指出,在一个有23人或更多人的房间里,至少有两人同一天生日的概率超过50%。这个悖论挑战了直觉,因为人们通常会根据365天来估计需要多少人才会有这样的概率,但实际上,这个...
生日相同问题,也称为生日悖论,是一个概率问题,题目可能要求计算在一定人数下有至少两人生日相同的概率。算法描述会解释概率计算方法,代码部分则展示了如何用程序来模拟或计算这个概率。 约瑟夫问题是一个著名的...
5. **生日悖论**:在400人中,根据概率计算,即使每年有365天,也有可能存在至少两人在同一天生日。这是由于概率的累积效应,而非直观上的小概率事件不会发生。 6. **概率模拟实验**:模拟实验是通过类似但可控制的...
指示器变量分析法在证明概率理论的其他定理时也十分有效,比如著名的“生日悖论”。这个悖论指出,在一个较小的群体中,很可能存在两个或多个人在同一日期出生。通过定义合适的随机变量和利用期望值,可以定量地理解...