- 浏览: 33590 次
- 性别:
- 来自: 上海
文章分类
最新评论
-
teamilk:
//panelHeight:'auto' 去掉这个属性,那么当 ...
jquery ui combobox 滚动条
转载 http://my.oschina.net/digerl/blog/33282
为了比较一下ReentrantLock和synchronized的性能,做了一下性能测试:
得出结论:
(1)使用Lock的性能比使用synchronized关键字要提高4~5倍;
(2)使用信号量实现同步的速度大约比synchronized要慢10~20%;
(3)使用atomic包的AtomicInter速度是比Lock要快1一个数量级。
ReentrantLock 类
java.util.concurrent.lock 中的 Lock 框架是锁定的一个抽象,它允许把锁定的实现作为 Java 类,而不是作为语言的特性来实现。这就为 Lock 的多种实现留下了空间,各种实现可能有不同的调度算法、性能特性或者锁定语义。ReentrantLock 类实现了 Lock,它拥有与 synchronized 相同的并发性和内存语义,但是添加了类似锁投票、定时锁等候和可中断锁等候的一些特性。此外,它还提供了在激烈争用情况下更佳的性能。(换句话说,当许多线程都想访问共享资源时,JVM 可以花更少的时候来调度线程,把更多时间用在执行线程上。)
reentrant 锁意味着什么呢?简单来说,它有一个与锁相关的获取计数器,如果拥有锁的某个线程再次得到锁,那么获取计数器就加1,然后锁需要被释放两次才能获得真正释放。这模仿了 synchronized 的语义;如果线程进入由线程已经拥有的监控器保护的 synchronized 块,就允许线程继续进行,当线程退出第二个(或者后续)synchronized 块的时候,不释放锁,只有线程退出它进入的监控器保护的第一个 synchronized 块时,才释放锁。
在查看清单 1 中的代码示例时,可以看到 Lock 和 synchronized 有一点明显的区别 —— lock 必须在 finally 块中释放。否则,如果受保护的代码将抛出异常,锁就有可能永远得不到释放!这一点区别看起来可能没什么,但是实际上,它极为重要。忘记在 finally 块中释放锁,可能会在程序中留下一个定时bomb,当有一天bomb爆炸时,您要花费很大力气才有找到源头在哪。而使用同步,JVM 将确保锁会获得自动释放。
Test的源码
view plaincopy to clipboardprint?
01.public abstract class Test {
02. protected String id;
03. protected CyclicBarrier barrier;
04. protected long count;
05. protected int threadNum;
06. protected ExecutorService executor;
07.
08. public Test(String id, CyclicBarrier barrier, long count, int threadNum,
09. ExecutorService executor) {
10. this.id = id;
11. this.barrier = barrier;
12. this.count = count;
13. this.threadNum = threadNum;
14. this.executor = executor;
15. }
16.
17. public void startTest() {
18.
19. long start = System.currentTimeMillis();
20.
21. for (int j = 0; j < threadNum; j++) {
22. executor.execute(new Thread() {
23. @Override
24. public void run() {
25. for (int i = 0; i < count; i++) {
26. test();
27. }
28.
29. try {
30. barrier.await();
31.
32. } catch (InterruptedException e) {
33. e.printStackTrace();
34. } catch (BrokenBarrierException e) {
35. e.printStackTrace();
36. }
37. }
38. });
39. }
40.
41. try {
42. barrier.await();
43. } catch (InterruptedException e) {
44. e.printStackTrace();
45. } catch (BrokenBarrierException e) {
46. e.printStackTrace();
47. }
48.
49. // 所有线程执行完成之后,才会跑到这一步
50. long duration = System.currentTimeMillis() - start;
51. System.out.println(id + " = " + duration);
52. }
53.
54. protected abstract void test();
55.}
public abstract class Test {
protected String id;
protected CyclicBarrier barrier;
protected long count;
protected int threadNum;
protected ExecutorService executor;
public Test(String id, CyclicBarrier barrier, long count, int threadNum,
ExecutorService executor) {
this.id = id;
this.barrier = barrier;
this.count = count;
this.threadNum = threadNum;
this.executor = executor;
}
public void startTest() {
long start = System.currentTimeMillis();
for (int j = 0; j < threadNum; j++) {
executor.execute(new Thread() {
@Override
public void run() {
for (int i = 0; i < count; i++) {
test();
}
try {
barrier.await();
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
} catch (BrokenBarrierException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
});
}
try {
barrier.await();
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
} catch (BrokenBarrierException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
// 所有线程执行完成之后,才会跑到这一步
long duration = System.currentTimeMillis() - start;
System.out.println(id + " = " + duration);
}
protected abstract void test();
}
测试类ReentreLockTest 源码
view plaincopy to clipboardprint?
01.import thread.test.Test;
02.
03.public class ReentreLockTest {
04. private static long COUNT = 1000000;
05. private static Lock lock = new ReentrantLock();
06. private static long lockCounter = 0;
07. private static long syncCounter = 0;
08. private static long semaCounter = 0;
09. private static AtomicLong atomicCounter = new AtomicLong(0);
10. private static Object syncLock = new Object();
11. private static Semaphore mutex = new Semaphore(1);
12.
13. public static void testLock(int num, int threadCount) {
14.
15. }
16.
17. static long getLock() {
18. lock.lock();
19. try {
20. return lockCounter;
21. } finally {
22. lock.unlock();
23. }
24. }
25.
26. static long getSync() {
27. synchronized (syncLock) {
28. return syncCounter;
29. }
30. }
31.
32. static long getAtom() {
33. return atomicCounter.get();
34. }
35.
36. static long getSemaphore() throws InterruptedException {
37. mutex.acquire();
38.
39. try {
40. return semaCounter;
41. } finally {
42. mutex.release();
43. }
44. }
45.
46. static long getLockInc() {
47. lock.lock();
48. try {
49. return ++lockCounter;
50. } finally {
51. lock.unlock();
52. }
53. }
54.
55. static long getSyncInc() {
56. synchronized (syncLock) {
57. return ++syncCounter;
58. }
59. }
60.
61. static long getAtomInc() {
62. return atomicCounter.getAndIncrement();
63. }
64.
65. static class SemaTest extends Test {
66.
67. public SemaTest(String id, CyclicBarrier barrier, long count,
68. int threadNum, ExecutorService executor) {
69. super(id, barrier, count, threadNum, executor);
70. }
71.
72. @Override
73. protected void test() {
74. try {
75. getSemaphore();
76. } catch (InterruptedException e) {
77. e.printStackTrace();
78. }
79. }
80.
81. }
82.
83. static class LockTest extends Test {
84.
85. public LockTest(String id, CyclicBarrier barrier, long count,
86. int threadNum, ExecutorService executor) {
87. super(id, barrier, count, threadNum, executor);
88. }
89.
90. @Override
91. protected void test() {
92. getLock();
93. }
94.
95. }
96.
97. static class SyncTest extends Test {
98.
99. public SyncTest(String id, CyclicBarrier barrier, long count,
100. int threadNum, ExecutorService executor) {
101. super(id, barrier, count, threadNum, executor);
102. }
103.
104. @Override
105. protected void test() {
106. getSync();
107. }
108.
109. }
110.
111. static class AtomicTest extends Test {
112.
113. public AtomicTest(String id, CyclicBarrier barrier, long count,
114. int threadNum, ExecutorService executor) {
115. super(id, barrier, count, threadNum, executor);
116. }
117.
118. @Override
119. protected void test() {
120. getAtom();
121. }
122.
123. }
124.
125. public static void test(String id, long count, int threadNum,
126. ExecutorService executor) {
127.
128. final CyclicBarrier barrier = new CyclicBarrier(threadNum + 1,
129. new Thread() {
130.
131. @Override
132. public void run() {
133.
134. }
135. });
136.
137. System.out.println("==============================");
138. System.out.println("count = " + count + "\t" + "Thread Count = "
139. + threadNum);
140.
141. new LockTest("Lock ", barrier, COUNT, threadNum, executor).startTest();
142. new SyncTest("Sync ", barrier, COUNT, threadNum, executor).startTest();
143. new AtomicTest("Atom ", barrier, COUNT, threadNum, executor)
144. .startTest();
145. new SemaTest("Sema ", barrier, COUNT, threadNum, executor)
146. .startTest();
147. System.out.println("==============================");
148. }
149.
150. public static void main(String[] args) {
151. for (int i = 1; i < 5; i++) {
152. ExecutorService executor = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(10 * i);
153. test("", COUNT * i, 10 * i, executor);
154. }
155. }
156.}
import thread.test.Test;
public class ReentreLockTest {
private static long COUNT = 1000000;
private static Lock lock = new ReentrantLock();
private static long lockCounter = 0;
private static long syncCounter = 0;
private static long semaCounter = 0;
private static AtomicLong atomicCounter = new AtomicLong(0);
private static Object syncLock = new Object();
private static Semaphore mutex = new Semaphore(1);
public static void testLock(int num, int threadCount) {
}
static long getLock() {
lock.lock();
try {
return lockCounter;
} finally {
lock.unlock();
}
}
static long getSync() {
synchronized (syncLock) {
return syncCounter;
}
}
static long getAtom() {
return atomicCounter.get();
}
static long getSemaphore() throws InterruptedException {
mutex.acquire();
try {
return semaCounter;
} finally {
mutex.release();
}
}
static long getLockInc() {
lock.lock();
try {
return ++lockCounter;
} finally {
lock.unlock();
}
}
static long getSyncInc() {
synchronized (syncLock) {
return ++syncCounter;
}
}
static long getAtomInc() {
return atomicCounter.getAndIncrement();
}
static class SemaTest extends Test {
public SemaTest(String id, CyclicBarrier barrier, long count,
int threadNum, ExecutorService executor) {
super(id, barrier, count, threadNum, executor);
}
@Override
protected void test() {
try {
getSemaphore();
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
static class LockTest extends Test {
public LockTest(String id, CyclicBarrier barrier, long count,
int threadNum, ExecutorService executor) {
super(id, barrier, count, threadNum, executor);
}
@Override
protected void test() {
getLock();
}
}
static class SyncTest extends Test {
public SyncTest(String id, CyclicBarrier barrier, long count,
int threadNum, ExecutorService executor) {
super(id, barrier, count, threadNum, executor);
}
@Override
protected void test() {
getSync();
}
}
static class AtomicTest extends Test {
public AtomicTest(String id, CyclicBarrier barrier, long count,
int threadNum, ExecutorService executor) {
super(id, barrier, count, threadNum, executor);
}
@Override
protected void test() {
getAtom();
}
}
public static void test(String id, long count, int threadNum,
ExecutorService executor) {
final CyclicBarrier barrier = new CyclicBarrier(threadNum + 1,
new Thread() {
@Override
public void run() {
}
});
System.out.println("==============================");
System.out.println("count = " + count + "\t" + "Thread Count = "
+ threadNum);
new LockTest("Lock ", barrier, COUNT, threadNum, executor).startTest();
new SyncTest("Sync ", barrier, COUNT, threadNum, executor).startTest();
new AtomicTest("Atom ", barrier, COUNT, threadNum, executor)
.startTest();
new SemaTest("Sema ", barrier, COUNT, threadNum, executor)
.startTest();
System.out.println("==============================");
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
for (int i = 1; i < 5; i++) {
ExecutorService executor = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(10 * i);
test("", COUNT * i, 10 * i, executor);
}
}
}
结果
view plaincopy to clipboardprint?
01.==============================
02.count = 1000000 Thread Count = 10
03.Lock = 953
04.Sync = 3781
05.Atom = 78
06.Sema = 4922
07.==============================
08.==============================
09.count = 2000000 Thread Count = 20
10.Lock = 1906
11.Sync = 8469
12.Atom = 172
13.Sema = 9719
14.==============================
15.==============================
16.count = 3000000 Thread Count = 30
17.Lock = 2890
18.Sync = 12641
19.Atom = 219
20.Sema = 15015
21.==============================
22.==============================
23.count = 4000000 Thread Count = 40
24.Lock = 3844
25.Sync = 17141
26.Atom = 343
27.Sema = 19782
28.==============================
为了比较一下ReentrantLock和synchronized的性能,做了一下性能测试:
得出结论:
(1)使用Lock的性能比使用synchronized关键字要提高4~5倍;
(2)使用信号量实现同步的速度大约比synchronized要慢10~20%;
(3)使用atomic包的AtomicInter速度是比Lock要快1一个数量级。
ReentrantLock 类
java.util.concurrent.lock 中的 Lock 框架是锁定的一个抽象,它允许把锁定的实现作为 Java 类,而不是作为语言的特性来实现。这就为 Lock 的多种实现留下了空间,各种实现可能有不同的调度算法、性能特性或者锁定语义。ReentrantLock 类实现了 Lock,它拥有与 synchronized 相同的并发性和内存语义,但是添加了类似锁投票、定时锁等候和可中断锁等候的一些特性。此外,它还提供了在激烈争用情况下更佳的性能。(换句话说,当许多线程都想访问共享资源时,JVM 可以花更少的时候来调度线程,把更多时间用在执行线程上。)
reentrant 锁意味着什么呢?简单来说,它有一个与锁相关的获取计数器,如果拥有锁的某个线程再次得到锁,那么获取计数器就加1,然后锁需要被释放两次才能获得真正释放。这模仿了 synchronized 的语义;如果线程进入由线程已经拥有的监控器保护的 synchronized 块,就允许线程继续进行,当线程退出第二个(或者后续)synchronized 块的时候,不释放锁,只有线程退出它进入的监控器保护的第一个 synchronized 块时,才释放锁。
在查看清单 1 中的代码示例时,可以看到 Lock 和 synchronized 有一点明显的区别 —— lock 必须在 finally 块中释放。否则,如果受保护的代码将抛出异常,锁就有可能永远得不到释放!这一点区别看起来可能没什么,但是实际上,它极为重要。忘记在 finally 块中释放锁,可能会在程序中留下一个定时bomb,当有一天bomb爆炸时,您要花费很大力气才有找到源头在哪。而使用同步,JVM 将确保锁会获得自动释放。
Test的源码
view plaincopy to clipboardprint?
01.public abstract class Test {
02. protected String id;
03. protected CyclicBarrier barrier;
04. protected long count;
05. protected int threadNum;
06. protected ExecutorService executor;
07.
08. public Test(String id, CyclicBarrier barrier, long count, int threadNum,
09. ExecutorService executor) {
10. this.id = id;
11. this.barrier = barrier;
12. this.count = count;
13. this.threadNum = threadNum;
14. this.executor = executor;
15. }
16.
17. public void startTest() {
18.
19. long start = System.currentTimeMillis();
20.
21. for (int j = 0; j < threadNum; j++) {
22. executor.execute(new Thread() {
23. @Override
24. public void run() {
25. for (int i = 0; i < count; i++) {
26. test();
27. }
28.
29. try {
30. barrier.await();
31.
32. } catch (InterruptedException e) {
33. e.printStackTrace();
34. } catch (BrokenBarrierException e) {
35. e.printStackTrace();
36. }
37. }
38. });
39. }
40.
41. try {
42. barrier.await();
43. } catch (InterruptedException e) {
44. e.printStackTrace();
45. } catch (BrokenBarrierException e) {
46. e.printStackTrace();
47. }
48.
49. // 所有线程执行完成之后,才会跑到这一步
50. long duration = System.currentTimeMillis() - start;
51. System.out.println(id + " = " + duration);
52. }
53.
54. protected abstract void test();
55.}
public abstract class Test {
protected String id;
protected CyclicBarrier barrier;
protected long count;
protected int threadNum;
protected ExecutorService executor;
public Test(String id, CyclicBarrier barrier, long count, int threadNum,
ExecutorService executor) {
this.id = id;
this.barrier = barrier;
this.count = count;
this.threadNum = threadNum;
this.executor = executor;
}
public void startTest() {
long start = System.currentTimeMillis();
for (int j = 0; j < threadNum; j++) {
executor.execute(new Thread() {
@Override
public void run() {
for (int i = 0; i < count; i++) {
test();
}
try {
barrier.await();
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
} catch (BrokenBarrierException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
});
}
try {
barrier.await();
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
} catch (BrokenBarrierException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
// 所有线程执行完成之后,才会跑到这一步
long duration = System.currentTimeMillis() - start;
System.out.println(id + " = " + duration);
}
protected abstract void test();
}
测试类ReentreLockTest 源码
view plaincopy to clipboardprint?
01.import thread.test.Test;
02.
03.public class ReentreLockTest {
04. private static long COUNT = 1000000;
05. private static Lock lock = new ReentrantLock();
06. private static long lockCounter = 0;
07. private static long syncCounter = 0;
08. private static long semaCounter = 0;
09. private static AtomicLong atomicCounter = new AtomicLong(0);
10. private static Object syncLock = new Object();
11. private static Semaphore mutex = new Semaphore(1);
12.
13. public static void testLock(int num, int threadCount) {
14.
15. }
16.
17. static long getLock() {
18. lock.lock();
19. try {
20. return lockCounter;
21. } finally {
22. lock.unlock();
23. }
24. }
25.
26. static long getSync() {
27. synchronized (syncLock) {
28. return syncCounter;
29. }
30. }
31.
32. static long getAtom() {
33. return atomicCounter.get();
34. }
35.
36. static long getSemaphore() throws InterruptedException {
37. mutex.acquire();
38.
39. try {
40. return semaCounter;
41. } finally {
42. mutex.release();
43. }
44. }
45.
46. static long getLockInc() {
47. lock.lock();
48. try {
49. return ++lockCounter;
50. } finally {
51. lock.unlock();
52. }
53. }
54.
55. static long getSyncInc() {
56. synchronized (syncLock) {
57. return ++syncCounter;
58. }
59. }
60.
61. static long getAtomInc() {
62. return atomicCounter.getAndIncrement();
63. }
64.
65. static class SemaTest extends Test {
66.
67. public SemaTest(String id, CyclicBarrier barrier, long count,
68. int threadNum, ExecutorService executor) {
69. super(id, barrier, count, threadNum, executor);
70. }
71.
72. @Override
73. protected void test() {
74. try {
75. getSemaphore();
76. } catch (InterruptedException e) {
77. e.printStackTrace();
78. }
79. }
80.
81. }
82.
83. static class LockTest extends Test {
84.
85. public LockTest(String id, CyclicBarrier barrier, long count,
86. int threadNum, ExecutorService executor) {
87. super(id, barrier, count, threadNum, executor);
88. }
89.
90. @Override
91. protected void test() {
92. getLock();
93. }
94.
95. }
96.
97. static class SyncTest extends Test {
98.
99. public SyncTest(String id, CyclicBarrier barrier, long count,
100. int threadNum, ExecutorService executor) {
101. super(id, barrier, count, threadNum, executor);
102. }
103.
104. @Override
105. protected void test() {
106. getSync();
107. }
108.
109. }
110.
111. static class AtomicTest extends Test {
112.
113. public AtomicTest(String id, CyclicBarrier barrier, long count,
114. int threadNum, ExecutorService executor) {
115. super(id, barrier, count, threadNum, executor);
116. }
117.
118. @Override
119. protected void test() {
120. getAtom();
121. }
122.
123. }
124.
125. public static void test(String id, long count, int threadNum,
126. ExecutorService executor) {
127.
128. final CyclicBarrier barrier = new CyclicBarrier(threadNum + 1,
129. new Thread() {
130.
131. @Override
132. public void run() {
133.
134. }
135. });
136.
137. System.out.println("==============================");
138. System.out.println("count = " + count + "\t" + "Thread Count = "
139. + threadNum);
140.
141. new LockTest("Lock ", barrier, COUNT, threadNum, executor).startTest();
142. new SyncTest("Sync ", barrier, COUNT, threadNum, executor).startTest();
143. new AtomicTest("Atom ", barrier, COUNT, threadNum, executor)
144. .startTest();
145. new SemaTest("Sema ", barrier, COUNT, threadNum, executor)
146. .startTest();
147. System.out.println("==============================");
148. }
149.
150. public static void main(String[] args) {
151. for (int i = 1; i < 5; i++) {
152. ExecutorService executor = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(10 * i);
153. test("", COUNT * i, 10 * i, executor);
154. }
155. }
156.}
import thread.test.Test;
public class ReentreLockTest {
private static long COUNT = 1000000;
private static Lock lock = new ReentrantLock();
private static long lockCounter = 0;
private static long syncCounter = 0;
private static long semaCounter = 0;
private static AtomicLong atomicCounter = new AtomicLong(0);
private static Object syncLock = new Object();
private static Semaphore mutex = new Semaphore(1);
public static void testLock(int num, int threadCount) {
}
static long getLock() {
lock.lock();
try {
return lockCounter;
} finally {
lock.unlock();
}
}
static long getSync() {
synchronized (syncLock) {
return syncCounter;
}
}
static long getAtom() {
return atomicCounter.get();
}
static long getSemaphore() throws InterruptedException {
mutex.acquire();
try {
return semaCounter;
} finally {
mutex.release();
}
}
static long getLockInc() {
lock.lock();
try {
return ++lockCounter;
} finally {
lock.unlock();
}
}
static long getSyncInc() {
synchronized (syncLock) {
return ++syncCounter;
}
}
static long getAtomInc() {
return atomicCounter.getAndIncrement();
}
static class SemaTest extends Test {
public SemaTest(String id, CyclicBarrier barrier, long count,
int threadNum, ExecutorService executor) {
super(id, barrier, count, threadNum, executor);
}
@Override
protected void test() {
try {
getSemaphore();
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
static class LockTest extends Test {
public LockTest(String id, CyclicBarrier barrier, long count,
int threadNum, ExecutorService executor) {
super(id, barrier, count, threadNum, executor);
}
@Override
protected void test() {
getLock();
}
}
static class SyncTest extends Test {
public SyncTest(String id, CyclicBarrier barrier, long count,
int threadNum, ExecutorService executor) {
super(id, barrier, count, threadNum, executor);
}
@Override
protected void test() {
getSync();
}
}
static class AtomicTest extends Test {
public AtomicTest(String id, CyclicBarrier barrier, long count,
int threadNum, ExecutorService executor) {
super(id, barrier, count, threadNum, executor);
}
@Override
protected void test() {
getAtom();
}
}
public static void test(String id, long count, int threadNum,
ExecutorService executor) {
final CyclicBarrier barrier = new CyclicBarrier(threadNum + 1,
new Thread() {
@Override
public void run() {
}
});
System.out.println("==============================");
System.out.println("count = " + count + "\t" + "Thread Count = "
+ threadNum);
new LockTest("Lock ", barrier, COUNT, threadNum, executor).startTest();
new SyncTest("Sync ", barrier, COUNT, threadNum, executor).startTest();
new AtomicTest("Atom ", barrier, COUNT, threadNum, executor)
.startTest();
new SemaTest("Sema ", barrier, COUNT, threadNum, executor)
.startTest();
System.out.println("==============================");
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
for (int i = 1; i < 5; i++) {
ExecutorService executor = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(10 * i);
test("", COUNT * i, 10 * i, executor);
}
}
}
结果
view plaincopy to clipboardprint?
01.==============================
02.count = 1000000 Thread Count = 10
03.Lock = 953
04.Sync = 3781
05.Atom = 78
06.Sema = 4922
07.==============================
08.==============================
09.count = 2000000 Thread Count = 20
10.Lock = 1906
11.Sync = 8469
12.Atom = 172
13.Sema = 9719
14.==============================
15.==============================
16.count = 3000000 Thread Count = 30
17.Lock = 2890
18.Sync = 12641
19.Atom = 219
20.Sema = 15015
21.==============================
22.==============================
23.count = 4000000 Thread Count = 40
24.Lock = 3844
25.Sync = 17141
26.Atom = 343
27.Sema = 19782
28.==============================
发表评论
-
log4j
2012-03-01 18:07 0转载 1. log4j输出多个自定义日志文件 log ... -
java synchronized ReentrantLock 多线程
2012-02-14 18:00 744ReentrantLock 类 java.util.concu ... -
HashMap因为多线程 null
2011-11-10 19:09 1270HashMap因为多线程未同步时导致put进的元素get出来为 ... -
DataTable
2010-09-08 22:10 564有空看看,哎 -
struts 前台如何使用集合,集合中是自定义类型
2010-09-08 22:04 634问题背景: 有两个主从表,比如 账单表bill-> ... -
JBPM
2010-09-06 16:38 707camunda fox is coming…camunda f ...
相关推荐
在Java多线程编程中,`ReentrantLock`和`synchronized`都是用于实现线程同步的重要工具,确保在并发环境中数据的一致性和正确性。两者虽然都能实现互斥访问,但在功能、性能以及使用场景上有所不同。下面我们将深入...
### ReentrantLock 与 synchronized 的比较 #### 一、引言 在Java中,多线程和并发控制一直是程序员关注的重点。随着Java的发展,其语言本身及...通过合理运用这两种工具,可以有效地提高应用程序的并发性能和稳定性。
在Java并发编程中,理解和熟练使用同步机制是至关重要的,这包括了`ReentrantLock`和`synchronized`关键字。这两个工具都是为了确保多线程环境中的数据一致性与安全性,防止出现竞态条件和死锁等问题。 `...
在Java编程中,synchronized和ReentrantLock都是用于实现线程同步的重要工具,它们在并发控制方面扮演着关键角色。然而,两者之间存在一些显著的区别,这些差异体现在功能、灵活性、性能以及使用场景上。 首先,...
本文将深入探讨Synchronized关键字锁和ReentrantLock锁的异同、功能特性以及它们在实际应用中的适用场景。 首先,Synchronized是一种内置的Java关键字,它提供了简单而强大的线程同步机制。当一个线程进入一个由...
Lock、Synchronized 和 ReentrantLock 的使用 Lock、Synchronized 和 ReentrantLock 是 Java 中三种常用的同步机制,每种机制都有其特点和使用场景。下面对这三种机制进行详细的分析和比较。 一、Synchronized ...
在Java中,有两种主要的锁机制:内置的`synchronized`关键字和显式的`ReentrantLock`类。这两者各有优劣,适用于不同的场景。下面我们将详细讨论它们的区别、性能、特性以及使用上的差异。 1. **功能对比**: - `...
Java中的ReentrantLock是线程安全编程中的一种高级锁机制,它属于Lock接口的一个实现,提供了比synchronized更丰富的功能和更高的灵活性。ReentrantLock的名字来源于它的可重入性,这意味着一个线程可以多次获取同一...
`ReentrantLock`是Java并发编程中的一种高级锁机制,它是`java.util.concurrent.locks`包中的类,提供了比`...了解并熟练使用`ReentrantLock`能帮助开发者更好地解决并发问题,提高程序的并发性能和健壮性。
《ReentrantLock深度解析》 在Java并发编程中,ReentrantLock是JDK提供的一个可...在实际开发中,可以根据需求选择使用synchronized还是ReentrantLock,或者其他的并发控制手段,以达到最佳的并发性能和资源利用效率。
理解和合理使用`synchronized`能够帮助我们构建稳定、高效的多线程程序,但同时也要注意避免潜在的死锁和性能问题。在实际编程中,应结合具体场景选择`synchronized`或者`ReentrantLock`等同步工具。
《ReentrantLock源码详解与应用》 ReentrantLock,可重入锁,是Java并发编程中一个重要的锁实现,它提供了比...理解ReentrantLock的源码有助于我们更好地掌握并发编程中的锁机制,以优化并发性能和避免死锁等问题。
Java中的`synchronized`关键字是多线程编程中的一个重要概念,用于控制并发访问共享资源,以保证数据的一致性和完整性。这个关键词提供了互斥锁机制,防止多个线程同时执行同一段代码,确保了线程安全。 一、`...
在Java 5之后,引入了`java.util.concurrent`包,其中的`ReentrantLock`类提供了可重入锁,它具有与`synchronized`相似的功能,但更加灵活,支持公平锁、非公平锁以及可中断的锁等待。 **5. synchronized的应用示例...
在实际开发中,合理使用`synchronized`能有效防止数据不一致性和死锁问题,但过度使用可能会导致性能下降。因此,需要根据具体情况权衡其利弊,并考虑使用其他并发控制工具,如`java.util.concurrent`包中的`...
`synchronized`关键字和`ReentrantLock`是两种常见的同步工具,它们都用于控制并发访问共享资源,以防止数据不一致和线程安全问题。 `synchronized`是Java内建的同步机制,自Java 1.0起就已经存在。它可以修饰方法...
总之,`ReentrantLock`是Java并发编程中的强大工具,它提供了丰富的功能和灵活性,使得开发者能够根据具体需求调整锁的行为,提高并发代码的性能和安全性。在设计和实现多线程程序时,了解和正确使用`ReentrantLock`...
在Java编程语言中,`synchronized`关键字是一个至关重要的概念,它主要用于实现线程同步,以确保多线程环境下的数据一致性与...然而,在实际应用中,我们需要根据具体场景选择最合适的并发控制手段,平衡性能和安全性。
本文档总结了并发编程中的70道面试题及答案,涵盖了线程、synchronized、volatile、CAS、Lock、ReentrantLock等关键概念,旨在帮助开发者更好地理解并发编程的基本概念和机理。 线程间通信: * wait/notify机制:...