- 浏览: 251936 次
- 性别:
- 来自: 成都
文章分类
最新评论
-
wilsonchen:
...
pdf.js html5展现pdf -
angole:
不错,又学习到了。
mybatis打印sql -
hft24dq:
rxcss66 写道 个人没有搞明白什么原理,不过跟一楼说的一 ...
mybatis打印sql -
fireinjava:
fireinjava 写道org.apache.ibatis. ...
mybatis打印sql -
fireinjava:
org.apache.ibatis.logging.LogFa ...
mybatis打印sql
原文地址:http://code.google.com/p/jee6-cdi/wiki/DependencyInjectionAnIntroductoryTutorial_Part1
CDI is the Java standard for dependency injection (DI) and interception (AOP). It is evident from the popularity of DI and AOP that Java needs to address DI and AOP so that it can build other standards and JSRs on top of it. DI and AOP are the foundation of many Java frameworks, and CDI will be the foundation of many future specifications and JSRs.
This article discusses dependency injection in a tutorial format. It covers some of the features of CDI such as type safe annotations configuration, alternatives and more. This tutorial is split into two parts, the first part covers the basis of dependency injection, @Inject, @Produces and @Qualifiers. The next part in this series covers advanced topics like creating pluggable components with Instance and processing annotations for configuration.
CDI is a foundational aspect of Java EE 6. It is or will be shortly supported by Caucho's Resin, IBM's WebSphere, Oracle's Glassfish, Red Hat's JBoss and many more application servers. CDI is similar to core Spring and Guice frameworks.
<bold>
Like JPA did for ORM, CDI simplifies and sanitizes the API for DI and AOP
</bold>
. If you have worked with Spring or Guice, you will find CDI easy to use and easy to learn. If you are new to Dependency Injection (DI), then CDI is an easy on ramp for picking up DI quickly. CDI is simpler to use and learn.
CDI can be used standalone and can be embedded into any application.
Source code for this tutorial, and instructions for use.
It is no accident that this tutorial follows this Spring 2.5 DI tutorial (using Spring "new" DI annotations) written three years ago. It will be interesting to compare and contrast the examples in this tutorial with the one written three years ago for Spring DI annotations.
Design goals of this tutorial
This tutorial series is meant to be a description and explanation of DI in CDI without the clutter of EJB 3.1 or JSF. There are already plenty of tutorials that cover EJB 3.1 and JSF with CDI as a supporting actor.
CDI has merit on its own outside of the EJB and JSF space. This tutorial only covers CDI. Repeat there is no JSF 2 or EJB 3.1 in this tutorial. There are plenty of articles and tutorials that cover using CDI as part of a larger JEE 6 application. This tutorial is not that. This tutorial series is CDI and only CDI.
This tutorial only has full, complete code examples with source code you can download and try out on your own. There are no code snippets where you can't figure out where in the code you are suppose to be.
We start out slow, step by step and basic. Then once you understand the fundamentals, we pick up the pace quite a bit.
All code examples have actually been run. We don't type in ad hoc code. If it did not run, it is not in our tutorial. We are not winging it.
There are clear headings for code listings so you can use this tutorial as a cookbook when you want to use some feature of CDI DI in the future. This is a code centric tutorial. Again, the code listings are in the TOC on the wiki page so you can find just the code listing you are looking for quickly like an index for a cookbook.
Decorators, Extentions, Interceptors, Scopes are out of scope for this first tutorial. Expect them in future tutorials.
If this tutorial is well recieved and we get enough feedback through, the JavaLobby articles, our google group and comments section of the wiki then we will add a comprehensive tutorial on CDI AOP (Decorators and Interceptors) and one on Extentions. The more positive and/or constructive feedback we get the more encouraged we will be to add more.
Introduction
Design goals of this tutorial
Dependency Injection
Dependency Injection- AutomatedTellerMachine without CDI or Spring or Guice
Code Listing: AutomatedTellerMachine interface
Code Listing: ATMTransport interface
Code Listing: AutomatedTellerMachineImpl class
Three example transports: SoapAtmTransport , StandardAtmTransport and JsonAtmTransport
Code Listing: StandardAtmTransport
Code Listing: SoapAtmTransport
Code Listing: JsonRestAtmTransport
Code Listing: AtmMain : DI without CDI, Spring or Guice
Code Listing: AtmMain : DI without CDI, Spring or Guice: setTransport
Running the examples
Dependency Injection- AutomatedTellerMachine using CDI
Step 1: Create an empty bean.xml file under META-INF resource folder
META-INF/beans.xml
Code Listing: META-INF/beans.xml just as empty as can be
Step 2: Use the @Inject annotation to annotate a setTransport setter method in AutomatedTellerMachineImpl
Code Listing: AutomatedTellerMachineImpl using @Inject to inject a transport
Step 3: Use the @Default annotation to annotate the StandardAtmTransport
Code Listing: StandardAtmTransport using @Default
Step 4: Use the @Alternative to annotate the SoapAtmTransport , and JsonRestAtmTransport .
Code Listing: JsonRestAtmTransport using @Alternative
Code Listing: SoapAtmTransport using @Alternative
Step 5: Use the @Named annotation to make the AutomatedTellerMachineImpl easy to look up; give it the name "atm"
Code Listing: AutomatedTellerMachineImpl using @Named
Step 6: Use the CDI beanContainer to look up the atm , makes some deposits and withdraws.
Code Listing: AtmMain looking up the atm by name
Code Listing: AtmMain looking up the atm by type
Using @Inject to inject via constructor args and fields
Code Listing: AutomatedTellerMachineImpl.transport using @Inject to do field injection.
Code Listing: AutomatedTellerMachineImpl.transport using @Inject to do constructor injection.
Using simple @Produces
Code Listing: TransportFactory.createTransport using @Produces to define a factory method
Code Listing: AutomatedTellerMachineImpl receives the simple producer
Using @Alternative to select an Alternative
Code Listing: {classpath}/META-INF/beans.xml
Code Listing: Using @Qualifier to inject different types
Code Listing: Soap runtime qualifier annotation
Code Listing: SoapAtmTransport using new @Soap qualifier
Code Listing: AutomatedTellerMachineImpl injecting SoapAtmTransport using new @Soap qualifier via constructor arg
Code Listing: AutomatedTellerMachineImpl injecting SoapAtmTransport using new @Soap qualifier via setter method arg
Code Listing: AutomatedTellerMachineImpl injecting SoapAtmTransport using new @Soap qualifier via setter method arg
Using @Qualfiers to inject multiple types into the same bean using
Code Listing: AutomatedTellerMachineImpl injecting multiple transports using new multiple qualifiers
Using @Producer to make a decision about creation
Code Listing: TransportFactory deciding which transport to use/create
Using @Producer that uses qualifiers to make a decision about creation
Code Listing: TransportFactory injecting qualifier args
Using multiple @Qualifiers at the same injection point to discriminate further
Code Listing: SuperFast defining a new qualifier
Code Listing: StandardFrameRelaySwitchingFlubber defining another new qualifier
Code Listing: SuperFastAtmTransport uses two qualifiers
Code Listing: StandardAtmTransport changed to use one qualifier
Code Listing: AutomatedTellerMachineImpl changed to use two qualifier
Using @Qualfiers with members to discriminate injection and stop the explosion of annotation creation
Code Listing: Transport qualifier that has an enum member
Code Listing: TransportType enum that defines a type
Code Listing: SoapAtmTransport using @Transport(type=TransportType.SOAP)
Code Listing: StandardAtmTransport using @Transport(type=TransportType.STANDARD)
Code Listing: JsonRestAtmTransport using @Transport(type=TransportType.JSON)
Code Listing: AutomatedTellerMachineImpl using @Inject @Transport(type=TransportType.STANDARD)
Code Listing: Transport qualifier annotation with more than one member
Code Listing: AutomatedTellerMachineImpl using two qualifier members to discriminate
Conclusion
Resources
About the Author
Dependency Injection
Dependency Injection (DI) refers to the process of supplying an external dependency to a software component. DI can help make your code architecturally pure.
It aids in design by interface as well as test-driven development by providing a consistent way to inject dependencies. For example, a data access object (DAO) may depend on a database connection.
Instead of looking up the database connection with JNDI, you could inject it.
One way to think about a DI framework like CDI is to think of JNDI turned inside out. Instead of an object looking up other objects that it needs to get its job done (dependencies), a DI container injects those dependent objects. This is the so-called Hollywood Principle, "Don't call us�" (lookup objects), "we'll call you" (inject objects).
If you have worked with CRC cards you can think of a dependency as a collaborator. A collaborator is an object that another object needs to perform its role, like a DAO (data access object) needs a JDBC connection object for example.
Dependency Injection-AutomatedTellerMachine without CDI or Spring or Guice
Let's say that you have an automated teller machine (ATM, also known as an automated banking machine in other countries) and it needs the ability to talk to a bank. It uses what it calls a transport object to do this. In this example, a transport object handles the low-level communication to the bank.
This example could be represented by these two interfaces as follows:
Code Listing: AutomatedTellerMachine interface
package org.cdi.advocacy;
import java.math.BigDecimal;
public interface AutomatedTellerMachine {
public abstract void deposit(BigDecimal bd);
public abstract void withdraw(BigDecimal bd);
}
Code Listing: ATMTransport interface
package org.cdi.advocacy;
public interface ATMTransport {
public void communicateWithBank(byte[] datapacket);
}
Now the AutomatedTellerMachine needs a transport to perform its intent, namely withdraw money and deposit money. To carry out these tasks, the AutomatedTellerMachine may depend on many objects and collaborates with its dependencies to complete the work.
An implementation of the AutomatedTellerMachine may look like this:
Code Listing: AutomatedTellerMachineImpl class
package org.cdi.advocacy;
...
public class AutomatedTellerMachineImpl implements AutomatedTellerMachine {
private ATMTransport transport;
...
public void deposit(BigDecimal bd) {
System.out.println("deposit called");
transport.communicateWithBank(...);
}
public void withdraw(BigDecimal bd) {
System.out.println("withdraw called");
transport.communicateWithBank(...);
}
}
The AutomatedTellerMachineImpl does not know or care how the transport withdraws and deposits money from the bank. This level of indirection allows us to replace the transport with different implementations such as in the following example:
Three example transports: SoapAtmTransport, StandardAtmTransport and JsonAtmTransport
Code Listing: StandardAtmTransport
package org.cdi.advocacy;
public class StandardAtmTransport implements ATMTransport {
public void communicateWithBank(byte[] datapacket) {
System.out.println("communicating with bank via Standard transport");
...
}
}
Code Listing: SoapAtmTransport
package org.cdi.advocacy;
public class SoapAtmTransport implements ATMTransport {
public void communicateWithBank(byte[] datapacket) {
System.out.println("communicating with bank via Soap transport");
...
}
}
Code Listing: JsonRestAtmTransport
package org.cdi.advocacy;
public class JsonRestAtmTransport implements ATMTransport {
public void communicateWithBank(byte[] datapacket) {
System.out.println("communicating with bank via JSON REST transport");
}
}
Notice the possible implementations of the ATMTransport interface. The AutomatedTellerMachineImpl does not know or care which transport it uses. Also, for testing and developing, instead of talking to a real bank, you could easily use Mockito or EasyMock or you could even write a SimulationAtmTransport that was a mock implementation just for testing.
The concept of DI transcends CDI, Guice and Spring. Thus, you can accomplish DI without CDI, Guice or Spring as follows:
Code Listing: AtmMain: DI without CDI, Spring or Guice
package org.cdi.advocacy;
public class AtmMain {
public void main (String[] args) {
AutomatedTellerMachine atm = new AutomatedTellerMachineImpl();
ATMTransport transport = new SoapAtmTransport();
/* Inject the transport. */
((AutomatedTellerMachineImpl)atm).setTransport(transport);
atm.withdraw(new BigDecimal("10.00"));
atm.deposit(new BigDecimal("100.00"));
}
}
Then injecting a different transport is a mere matter of calling a different setter method as follows:
Code Listing: AtmMain: DI without CDI, Spring or Guice: setTransport
ATMTransport transport = new SimulationAtmTransport();
((AutomatedTellerMachineImpl)atm).setTransport(transport);
The above assumes we added a setTransport method to the AutomateTellerMachineImpl. Note you could just as easily use constructor arguments instead of a setter method. Thus keeping the interface of your AutomateTellerMachineImpl clean.
Running the examples
To run the examples quickly, we setup some maven pom.xml files for you. Here are the instructions to get the examples up and running.
Dependency Injection-AutomatedTellerMachine using CDI
To use CDI to manage the dependencies, do the following:
Create an empty bean.xml file under META-INF resource folder
Use the @Inject annotation to annotate a setTransport setter method in AutomatedTellerMachineImpl
Use the @Default annotation to annotate the StandardAtmTransport
Use the @Alternative to annotate the SoapAtmTransport, and JsonRestAtmTransport.
Use the @Named annotation to make the AutomatedTellerMachineImpl easy to look up; give it the name "atm"
Use the CDI beanContainer to look up the atm, makes some deposits and withdraws.
Step 1: Create an empty bean.xml file under META-INF resource folder
META-INF/beans.xml
CDI needs an bean.xml file to be in META-INF of your jar file or classpath or WEB-INF of your web application. This file can be completely empty (as in 0 bytes). If there is no beans.xml file in your META-INF or WEB-INF then that war file or jar file will not be processed by CDI. Otherwise, CDI will scan the jar and war file if the beans.xml file exists even if it is 0 bytes.
Code Listing: META-INF/beans.xml just as empty as can be
<beans xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xsi:schemaLocation="
http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee
http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee/beans_1_0.xsd">
</beans>
Notice that we included a starter beans.xml file with a namespace and a <beans> element. Although beans.xml could be completely empty, it is nice to have a starter file so when you need to add things (like later on in this tutorial) you can readily. Also it keeps the IDE from complaining about ill formed xml when you actually do have a 0 byte beans.xml. (I hate when the IDE complains. It is very distracting.)
Step 2: Use the @Inject annotation to annotate a setTransport setter method in AutomatedTellerMachineImpl
The @Inject annotation is used to mark where an injection goes. You can annotate constructor arguments, instance fields and setter methods of properties. In this example, we will annotate the setTransport method (which would be the setter method of the transport property).
Code Listing: AutomatedTellerMachineImpl using @Inject to inject a transport
package org.cdi.advocacy;
...
import javax.inject.Inject;
public class AutomatedTellerMachineImpl implements AutomatedTellerMachine {
private ATMTransport transport;
@Inject
public void setTransport(ATMTransport transport) {
this.transport = transport;
}
...
}
By default, CDI would look for a class that implements the ATMTransport interface, once it finds this it creates an instance and injects this instance of ATMTransport using the setter method setTransport. If we only had one possible instance of ATMTransport in our classpath, we would not need to annotate any of the ATMTransport implementations. Since we have three, namely, StandardAtmTransport, SoapAtmTransport, and JsonAtmTransport, we need to mark two of them as @Alternative's and one as @Default.
Step 3: Use the @Default annotation to annotate the StandardAtmTransport
At this stage of the example, we would like our default transport to be StandardAtmTransport; thus, we mark it as @Default as follows:
Code Listing: StandardAtmTransport using @Default
package org.cdi.advocacy;
import javax.enterprise.inject.Default;
@Default
public class StandardAtmTransport implements ATMTransport {
...
It should be noted that a class is @Default by default. Thus marking it so is redundant; and not only that its redundant.
Step 4: Use the @Alternative to annotate the SoapAtmTransport, and JsonRestAtmTransport.
If we don't mark the others as @Alternative, they are by default as far as CDI is concerned, marked as @Default. Let's mark JsonRestAtmTransport and SoapRestAtmTransport @Alternative so CDI does not get confused.
Code Listing: JsonRestAtmTransport using @Alternative
package org.cdi.advocacy;
import javax.enterprise.inject.Alternative;
@Alternative
public class JsonRestAtmTransport implements ATMTransport {
...
}
Code Listing: SoapAtmTransport using @Alternative
package org.cdi.advocacy;
import javax.enterprise.inject.Alternative;
@Alternative
public class SoapAtmTransport implements ATMTransport {
...
}
Step 5: Use the @Named annotation to make the AutomatedTellerMachineImpl easy to look up; give it the name "atm"
Since we are not using AutomatedTellerMachineImpl from a Java EE 6 application, let's just use the beanContainer to look it up. Let's give it an easy logical name like "atm". To give it a name, use the @Named annotation. The @Named annotation is also used by JEE 6 application to make the bean accessible via the Unified EL (EL stands for Expression language and it gets used by JSPs and JSF components).
Here is an example of using @Named to give the AutomatedTellerMachineImpl the name "atm"as follows:
Code Listing: AutomatedTellerMachineImpl using @Named
package org.cdi.advocacy;
import java.math.BigDecimal;
import javax.inject.Inject;
import javax.inject.Named;
@Named("atm")
public class AutomatedTellerMachineImpl implements AutomatedTellerMachine {
...
}
It should be noted that if you use the @Named annotations and don't provide a name, then the name is the name of the class with the first letter lower case so this:
@Named
public class AutomatedTellerMachineImpl implements AutomatedTellerMachine {
...
}
makes the name automatedTellerMachineImpl.
Step 6: Use the CDI beanContainer to look up the atm, makes some deposits and withdraws.
Lastly we want to look up the atm using the beanContainer and make some deposits.
Code Listing: AtmMain looking up the atm by name
package org.cdi.advocacy;
...
public class AtmMain {
...
...
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
AutomatedTellerMachine atm = (AutomatedTellerMachine) beanContainer
.getBeanByName("atm");
atm.deposit(new BigDecimal("1.00"));
}
}
When you run it from the command line, you should get the following:
Output
deposit called
communicating with bank via Standard transport
You can also lookup the AtmMain by type and an optional list of Annotations as the name is really to support the Unified EL (JSPs, JSF, etc.).
Code Listing: AtmMain looking up the atm by type
package org.cdi.advocacy;
...
public class AtmMain {
...
...
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
AutomatedTellerMachine atm = beanContainer.getBeanByType(AutomatedTellerMachine.class);
atm.deposit(new BigDecimal("1.00"));
}
}
Since a big part of CDI is its type safe injection, looking up things by name is probably discouraged. Notice we have one less cast due to Java Generics.
If you remove the @Default from the StandardATMTransport, you will get the same output. If you remove the @Alternative from both of the other transports, namely, JsonATMTransport, and SoapATMTransport, CDI will croak as follows:
Output
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError
Caused by: javax.enterprise.inject.AmbiguousResolutionException: org.cdi.advocacy.AutomatedTellerMachineImpl.setTransport:
Too many beans match, because they all have equal precedence.
See the @Stereotype and <enable> tags to choose a precedence. Beans:
ManagedBeanImpl[JsonRestAtmTransport, {@Default(), @Any()}]
ManagedBeanImpl[SoapAtmTransport, {@Default(), @Any()}]
ManagedBeanImpl[StandardAtmTransport, {@javax.enterprise.inject.Default(), @Any()}]
...
CDI expects to find one and only one qualified injection. Later we will discuss how to use an alternative.
Using @Inject to inject via constructor args and fields
You can inject into fields,constructor arguments and setter methods (or any method really).
Here is an example of field injections:
Code Listing: AutomatedTellerMachineImpl.transport using @Inject to do field injection.
...
public class AutomatedTellerMachineImpl implements AutomatedTellerMachine {
@Inject
private ATMTransport transport;
Code Listing: AutomatedTellerMachineImpl.transport using @Inject to do constructor injection.
...
public class AutomatedTellerMachineImpl implements AutomatedTellerMachine {
@Inject
public AutomatedTellerMachineImpl(ATMTransport transport) {
this.transport = transport;
}
This flexibility allows you to create classes that are easy to unit test.
Using simple @Produces
There are times when the creation of an object may be complex. Instead of relying on a constructor, you can delegate to a factory class to create the instance. To do this with CDI, you would use the @Produces from your factory class as follows:
Code Listing: TransportFactory.createTransport using @Produces to define a factory method
package org.cdi.advocacy;
import javax.enterprise.inject.Produces;
public class TransportFactory {
@Produces ATMTransport createTransport() {
System.out.println("ATMTransport created with producer");
return new StandardAtmTransport();
}
}
The factory method could use qualifiers just like a class declaration. In this example, we chose not to. The AutomatedTellerMachineImpl does not need to specify any special qualifiers. Here is the AutomatedTellerMachineImpl that receives the simple producer.
Code Listing: AutomatedTellerMachineImpl receives the simple producer
import javax.inject.Inject;
import javax.inject.Named;
@Named("atm")
public class AutomatedTellerMachineImpl implements AutomatedTellerMachine {
@Inject
private ATMTransport transport;
...
Check your understanding by looking at the output of running this with AtmMain.
Output
ATMTransport created with producer
deposit called
communicating with bank via Standard transport
Using @Alternative to select an Alternative
Earlier, you may recall, we defined several alternative transports, namely, JsonRestAtmTransport and SoapRestAtmTransport. Imagine that you are an installer of ATM machines and you need to configure certain transports at certain locations. Our previous injection points essentially inject the default which is the StandardRestAtmTransport transport.
If I need to install a different transport, all I need to do is change the /META-INF/beans.xml file to use the right transport as follows:
Code Listing: {classpath}/META-INF/beans.xml
<beans xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xsi:schemaLocation="
http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee
http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee/beans_1_0.xsd">
<alternatives>
<class>org.cdi.advocacy.JsonRestAtmTransport</class>
</alternatives>
</beans>
You can see from the output that the JSON REST transport is selected.
Output
deposit called
communicating with bank via JSON REST transport
Alternatives codifies and simplifies a very normal case in DI, namely, you have different injected objects based on different builds or environments. The great thing about objects is they can be replaced (Grady Booch said this). Alternatives allow you to mark objects that are replacements for other objects and then activate them when you need them.
If the DI container can have alternatives, let's mark them as alternatives. Think about it this way. I don't have to document all of the alternatives as much. It is self documenting. If someone knows CDI and they know about Alternatives they will not be surprised. Alternatives really canonicalizes the way you select an Alternative.
You can think of CDI as a canonicalization of many patterns that we have been using with more general purpose DI frameworks. The simplification and canonicalization is part of the evolution of DI.
Code Listing: Using @Qualifier to inject different types
All objects and producers in CDI have qualifiers. If you do not assign a qualifier it by default has the qualifier @Default and @Any. It is like a TV crime show in the U.S., if you do not have money for a lawyer, you will be assigned one.
Qualifiers can be used to discriminate exactly what gets injected. You can write custom qualifiers.
Qualifiers work like garanimal tags for kids clothes, you match the qualifier from the injection target and the injection source, then that is the type that will be injected.
If the tags (Qualifiers) match, then you have a match for injection.
You may decide that at times you want to inject Soap or Json or the Standard transport. You don't want to list them as an alternative. You actually, for example, always want the Json implementation in a certain case.
Here is an example of defining a qualifier for Soap.
Code Listing: Soap runtime qualifier annotation
package org.cdi.advocacy;
import java.lang.annotation.Retention;
import java.lang.annotation.Target;
import static java.lang.annotation.ElementType.*;
import static java.lang.annotation.RetentionPolicy.*;
import javax.inject.Qualifier;
@Qualifier @Retention(RUNTIME) @Target({TYPE, METHOD, FIELD, PARAMETER})
public @interface Soap {
}
Notice that a qualifier is just a runtime annotation that is marked with the @Qualifier annotation. The @Qualifier is an annotation that decorates a runtime annoation to make it a qualifier.
Then we would just mark the source of the injection point, namely, SoapAtmTransport with our new @Soap qualifier as follows:
Code Listing: SoapAtmTransport using new @Soap qualifier
package org.cdi.advocacy;
@Soap
public class SoapAtmTransport implements ATMTransport {
@Override
public void communicateWithBank(byte[] datapacket) {
System.out.println("communicating with bank via Soap transport");
}
}
Next time you are ready to inject a Soap transport we can do that by annotating the argument to the constructor as follows:
Code Listing: AutomatedTellerMachineImpl injecting SoapAtmTransport using new @Soap qualifier via constructor arg
public class AutomatedTellerMachineImpl implements AutomatedTellerMachine {
private ATMTransport transport;
@Inject
public AutomatedTellerMachineImpl(@Soap ATMTransport transport) {
this.transport = transport;
}
You could also choose to do this via the setter method for the property as follows:
Code Listing: AutomatedTellerMachineImpl injecting SoapAtmTransport using new @Soap qualifier via setter method arg
public class AutomatedTellerMachineImpl implements AutomatedTellerMachine {
private ATMTransport transport;
@Inject
public void setTransport(@Soap ATMTransport transport) {
this.transport = transport;
}
And a very common option is to use a field level injection as follows:
Code Listing: AutomatedTellerMachineImpl injecting SoapAtmTransport using new @Soap qualifier via setter method arg
public class AutomatedTellerMachineImpl implements AutomatedTellerMachine {
@Inject @Soap
private ATMTransport transport;
From this point on, we are just going to use field level injection to simplify the examples.
Using @Qualfiers to inject multiple types into the same bean using
Let's say that our ATM machine uses different transport based on some business rules that are configured in LDAP or config file or XML or a database (does not really matter).
The point is you want it decided at runtime which transport we are going to use.
In this scenario we may want to inject three different transports and then configure a transport based on the business rules.
You are going to want to get notified when the injection is done and the bean is ready to go from a CDI perspective. To get this notifcation you would annotated an init method with the @PostConstruct annotation. Then you could pick which type of transport that you want to use.
Note the name of the method does not matter, it is the annotation that makes it an init method.
Code Listing: AutomatedTellerMachineImpl injecting multiple transports using new multiple qualifiers
package org.cdi.advocacy;
import java.math.BigDecimal;
import javax.annotation.PostConstruct;
import javax.inject.Inject;
import javax.inject.Named;
@Named("atm")
public class AutomatedTellerMachineImpl implements AutomatedTellerMachine {
private ATMTransport transport;
@Inject @Soap
private ATMTransport soapTransport;
@Inject @Json
private ATMTransport jsonTransport;
@Inject @Json
private ATMTransport standardTransport;
//These could be looked up in a DB, JNDI or a properties file.
private boolean useJSON = true;
private boolean behindFireWall = true;
@PostConstruct
protected void init() {
//Look up values for useJSON and behindFireWall
if (!behindFireWall) {
transport = standardTransport;
} else {
if (useJSON) {
transport = jsonTransport;
} else {
transport = soapTransport;
}
}
}
public void deposit(BigDecimal bd) {
System.out.println("deposit called");
transport.communicateWithBank(null);
}
...
}
Try to follow the code above. Try to guess the output. Now compare it to this:
Output
deposit called
communicating with bank via JSON REST transport
How did you do?
Using @Producer to make a decision about creation
This example builds on the last.
Perhaps you want to seperate the construction and selection of the transports from the AutomatedTellerMachineImpl.
You could create a Producer factory method that makes a decision about the creation and selection of the transport as follows:
Code Listing: TransportFactory deciding which transport to use/create
package org.cdi.advocacy;
import javax.enterprise.inject.Produces;
public class TransportFactory {
private boolean useJSON = true;
private boolean behindFireWall = true;
@Produces ATMTransport createTransport() {
//Look up config parameters in some config file or LDAP server or database
System.out.println("ATMTransport created with producer makes decisions");
if (behindFireWall) {
if (useJSON) {
System.out.println("Created JSON transport");
return new JsonRestAtmTransport();
} else {
System.out.println("Created SOAP transport");
return new SoapAtmTransport();
}
} else {
System.out.println("Created Standard transport");
return new StandardAtmTransport();
}
}
}
The advantage of this approach is that the logic to do the creation, is separate from the actual AutomatedTellerMachineImpl code.
This may not always be what you want, but if it is, then the producer can help you.
The output should be the same as before.
Output
ATMTransport created with producer makes decisions
Created JSON transport
deposit called
communicating with bank via JSON REST transport
Using @Producer that uses qualifiers to make a decision about creation
This example builds on the last.
You can also inject items as arguments into the producer as follows:
Code Listing: TransportFactory injecting qualifier args
package org.cdi.advocacy;
import javax.enterprise.inject.Produces;
public class TransportFactory {
private boolean useJSON = true;
private boolean behindFireWall = true;
@Produces ATMTransport createTransport( @Soap ATMTransport soapTransport,
@Json ATMTransport jsonTransport) {
//Look up config parameters in some config file
System.out.println("ATMTransport created with producer makes decisions");
if (behindFireWall) {
if (useJSON) {
System.out.println("return passed JSON transport");
return jsonTransport;
} else {
System.out.println("return passed SOAP transport");
return soapTransport;
}
} else {
System.out.println("Create Standard transport");
return new StandardAtmTransport();
}
}
}
In the above example, createTransport becomes less of a factory method and more of a selection method as CDI actually creates and passes the soapTransport and the jsonTransport.
Advanced topic: (Ignore this if it does not make sense) You may wonder why I create StandardAtmTransport and not inject it as a producer argument like soapTransport and jsonTransport. The problem is this createTransport is by default @Default and @Any but it overrides the StandardAtmTransport which is also by default @Default and @Any, but since StandardAtmTransport is overidden then if I inject @Default ATMTransport standardTransport as an argument then it tries to call createTransport since it is the @Default, which will then try to inject the argument standardTransport, which will then call createTransport, ad infinitum until we get a StackTraceOverflow. The solution is create a qualifier for the standard, say, @Standard and use that to do the injection, or create one for the createProduces production, say, @Transport. The key here is that the injection arguments of a producer have to have different qualifiers than the production method or all hell breaks lose, cats sleeping with dogs, pandimodium. Ok. Okay. The key here is that the injection arguments have to have different qualifiers than the production method or you will get a StackTraceOverflow as CDI calls your production method to resovle the injection point of you production method ad infinitum.
Here is the expected output.
Output
ATMTransport created with producer makes decisions
return passed JSON transport
deposit called
communicating with bank via JSON REST transport
Using multiple @Qualifiers at the same injection point to discriminate further
You can use more than one qaulifier to further discriminate your injection target.
To demonstrate this let's define to qualifiers SuperFast and StandardFrameRelaySwitchingFlubber. Let's say at the time we have two transports that are StandardFrameRelaySwitchingFlubber. Let's also say that you want to inject a transport that is not only a StandardFrameRelaySwitchingFlubber but also SuperFast.
First let's define the qualifier annotations as follows:
Code Listing: SuperFast defining a new qualifier
package org.cdi.advocacy;
...
@Qualifier @Retention(RUNTIME) @Target({TYPE, METHOD, FIELD, PARAMETER})
public @interface SuperFast {
}
Code Listing: StandardFrameRelaySwitchingFlubber defining another new qualifier
package org.cdi.advocacy;
...
@Qualifier @Retention(RUNTIME) @Target({TYPE, METHOD, FIELD, PARAMETER})
public @interface StandardFrameRelaySwitchingFlubber {
}
Ok, here is the code for the SuperFastAtmTransport which is marked with both the @SuperFast and the @StandardFrameRelaySwitchingFlubber qualifiers.
Code Listing: SuperFastAtmTransport uses two qualifiers
package org.cdi.advocacy;
@SuperFast @StandardFrameRelaySwitchingFlubber
public class SuperFastAtmTransport implements ATMTransport {
public void communicateWithBank(byte[] datapacket) {
System.out.println("communicating with bank via the Super Fast transport " );
}
}
Ok, we add the StandardFrameRelaySwitchingFlubber to the StandardAtmTransport as well.
Code Listing: StandardAtmTransport changed to use one qualifier
package org.cdi.advocacy;
@StandardFrameRelaySwitchingFlubber @Default
public class StandardAtmTransport implements ATMTransport {
public void communicateWithBank(byte[] datapacket) {
System.out.println("communicating with bank via Standard transport");
}
}
Next if I want my AutomatedTellerMachineImpl to have SuperFast transport with StandardFrameRelaySwitchingFlubber, I would use both in the injection target as follows:
Code Listing: AutomatedTellerMachineImpl changed to use two qualifier
public class AutomatedTellerMachineImpl implements AutomatedTellerMachine {
@Inject @SuperFast @StandardFrameRelaySwitchingFlubber
private ATMTransport transport;
...
Output:
deposit called
communicating with bank via the Super Fast transport
Exercise: Create a transport that is @SuperFast, @StandardFrameRelaySwitchingFlubber and an @Alternative. Then use beans.xml to activate this SuperFast, StandardFrameRelaySwitchingFlubber, Alternative transport. Send me your solution on the CDI group mailing list. The first one to send gets put on the CDI wall of fame.
Exercise for the reader. Change the injection point qualifiers to make only the StandardAtmTransport get injected. Send me your solution on the CDI group mailing list. Don't get discouraged if you get a stack trace or two that is part of the learning process. The first one to send gets put on the CDI wall of fame (everyone else gets an honorable mention).
Using @Qualfiers with members to discriminate injection and stop the explosion of annotation creation
There could be an explosion of qualifers annotations in your project. Imagine in our example if there were 20 types of transports. We would have 20 annotations defined.
This is probably not want you want. It is okay if you have a few, but it could quickly become unmanageable.
CDI allows you to descriminate on members of a qualifier to reduce the explosion of qualifiers. Instead of having three qualifier you could have one qualifier and an enum. Then if you need more types of transports, you only have to add an enum value instead of another class.
Let's demonstrate how this works by creating a new qualifier annotation called Transport. The Transport qualifier annotation will have a single member, an enum called type. The type member will be an new enum that we define called TransportType.
Here is the new TransportType:
Code Listing: Transport qualifier that has an enum member
package org.cdi.advocacy;
import java.lang.annotation.Retention;
import java.lang.annotation.Target;
import static java.lang.annotation.ElementType.*;
import static java.lang.annotation.RetentionPolicy.*;
import javax.inject.Qualifier;
@Qualifier @Retention(RUNTIME) @Target({TYPE, METHOD, FIELD, PARAMETER})
public @interface Transport {
TransportType type() default TransportType.STANDARD;
}
Here is the new enum that is part of the TransportType.
Code Listing: TransportType enum that defines a type
package org.cdi.advocacy;
public enum TransportType {
JSON, SOAP, STANDARD;
}
Next you need to qualify your transport instances like so:
Code Listing: SoapAtmTransport using @Transport(type=TransportType.SOAP)
package org.cdi.advocacy;
@Transport(type=TransportType.SOAP)
public class SoapAtmTransport implements ATMTransport {
...
Code Listing: StandardAtmTransport using @Transport(type=TransportType.STANDARD)
package org.cdi.advocacy;
@Transport(type=TransportType.STANDARD)
public class StandardAtmTransport implements ATMTransport {
...
Code Listing: JsonRestAtmTransport using @Transport(type=TransportType.JSON)
package org.cdi.advocacy;
@Transport(type=TransportType.JSON)
public class JsonRestAtmTransport implements ATMTransport {
...
Code Listing: AutomatedTellerMachineImpl using @Inject @Transport(type=TransportType.STANDARD)
@Named("atm")
public class AutomatedTellerMachineImpl implements AutomatedTellerMachine {
@Inject @Transport(type=TransportType.STANDARD)
private ATMTransport transport;
As always, you will want to run the example.
Output
deposit called
communicating with bank via Standard transport
You can have more than one member of the qualifier annotation as follows:
Code Listing: Transport qualifier annotation with more than one member
package org.cdi.advocacy;
import java.lang.annotation.Retention;
import java.lang.annotation.Target;
import static java.lang.annotation.ElementType.*;
import static java.lang.annotation.RetentionPolicy.*;
import javax.inject.Qualifier;
@Qualifier @Retention(RUNTIME) @Target({TYPE, METHOD, FIELD, PARAMETER})
public @interface Transport {
TransportType type() default TransportType.STANDARD;
int priorityLevel() default -1;
}
Now CDI is going to use both of the members to discriminate for injection.
If we had a transport like so:
Code Listing: AutomatedTellerMachineImpl using two qualifier members to discriminate
public class AutomatedTellerMachineImpl implements AutomatedTellerMachine {
@Inject @Transport(type=TransportType.STANDARD, priorityLevel=1)
private ATMTransport transport;
Then we get this:
Output
deposit called
communicating with bank via the Super Fast transport
You can match using any type supported by annotations, e.g., Strings, classes, enums, ints, etc.
Exercise: Add a member String to the qualifier annotation. Change the injection point to discriminate using this new string member. Why do you think this is counter to what CDI stands for? Send me your solution on the CDI group mailing list. The first one to send gets put on the CDI wall of fame. (All others get honorable mentions.)
Conclusion
Dependency Injection (DI) refers to the process of supplying an external dependency to a software component.
CDI is the Java standard for dependency injection and interception (AOP). It is evident from the popularity of DI and AOP that Java needs to address DI and AOP so that it can build other standards on top of it. DI and AOP are the foundation of many Java frameworks. I hope you share my vision of CDI as a basis for other JSRs, Java frameworks and standards.
This article discussed CDI dependency injection in a tutorial format. It covers some of the features of CDI such as type safe annotations configuration, alternatives and more. There was an introduction level and and advacned level.
CDI is a foundational aspect of Java EE 6. It is or will be shortly supported by Caucho's Resin, IBM's WebSphere, Oracle's Glassfish, Red Hat's JBoss and many more application servers. CDI is similar to core Spring and Guice frameworks. However CDI is a general purpose framework that can be used outside of JEE 6.
CDI is a rethink on how to do dependency injection and AOP (interception really). It simplifies it. It reduces it. It gets rid of legacy, outdated ideas.
CDI is to Spring and Guice what JPA is to Hibernate, and Toplink. CDI will co-exist with Spring and Guice. There are plugins to make them interoperate nicely. There is more integration option on the way.
This is just a brief taste. There is more to come
CDI is the Java standard for dependency injection (DI) and interception (AOP). It is evident from the popularity of DI and AOP that Java needs to address DI and AOP so that it can build other standards and JSRs on top of it. DI and AOP are the foundation of many Java frameworks, and CDI will be the foundation of many future specifications and JSRs.
This article discusses dependency injection in a tutorial format. It covers some of the features of CDI such as type safe annotations configuration, alternatives and more. This tutorial is split into two parts, the first part covers the basis of dependency injection, @Inject, @Produces and @Qualifiers. The next part in this series covers advanced topics like creating pluggable components with Instance and processing annotations for configuration.
CDI is a foundational aspect of Java EE 6. It is or will be shortly supported by Caucho's Resin, IBM's WebSphere, Oracle's Glassfish, Red Hat's JBoss and many more application servers. CDI is similar to core Spring and Guice frameworks.
<bold>
Like JPA did for ORM, CDI simplifies and sanitizes the API for DI and AOP
</bold>
. If you have worked with Spring or Guice, you will find CDI easy to use and easy to learn. If you are new to Dependency Injection (DI), then CDI is an easy on ramp for picking up DI quickly. CDI is simpler to use and learn.
CDI can be used standalone and can be embedded into any application.
Source code for this tutorial, and instructions for use.
It is no accident that this tutorial follows this Spring 2.5 DI tutorial (using Spring "new" DI annotations) written three years ago. It will be interesting to compare and contrast the examples in this tutorial with the one written three years ago for Spring DI annotations.
Design goals of this tutorial
This tutorial series is meant to be a description and explanation of DI in CDI without the clutter of EJB 3.1 or JSF. There are already plenty of tutorials that cover EJB 3.1 and JSF with CDI as a supporting actor.
CDI has merit on its own outside of the EJB and JSF space. This tutorial only covers CDI. Repeat there is no JSF 2 or EJB 3.1 in this tutorial. There are plenty of articles and tutorials that cover using CDI as part of a larger JEE 6 application. This tutorial is not that. This tutorial series is CDI and only CDI.
This tutorial only has full, complete code examples with source code you can download and try out on your own. There are no code snippets where you can't figure out where in the code you are suppose to be.
We start out slow, step by step and basic. Then once you understand the fundamentals, we pick up the pace quite a bit.
All code examples have actually been run. We don't type in ad hoc code. If it did not run, it is not in our tutorial. We are not winging it.
There are clear headings for code listings so you can use this tutorial as a cookbook when you want to use some feature of CDI DI in the future. This is a code centric tutorial. Again, the code listings are in the TOC on the wiki page so you can find just the code listing you are looking for quickly like an index for a cookbook.
Decorators, Extentions, Interceptors, Scopes are out of scope for this first tutorial. Expect them in future tutorials.
If this tutorial is well recieved and we get enough feedback through, the JavaLobby articles, our google group and comments section of the wiki then we will add a comprehensive tutorial on CDI AOP (Decorators and Interceptors) and one on Extentions. The more positive and/or constructive feedback we get the more encouraged we will be to add more.
Introduction
Design goals of this tutorial
Dependency Injection
Dependency Injection- AutomatedTellerMachine without CDI or Spring or Guice
Code Listing: AutomatedTellerMachine interface
Code Listing: ATMTransport interface
Code Listing: AutomatedTellerMachineImpl class
Three example transports: SoapAtmTransport , StandardAtmTransport and JsonAtmTransport
Code Listing: StandardAtmTransport
Code Listing: SoapAtmTransport
Code Listing: JsonRestAtmTransport
Code Listing: AtmMain : DI without CDI, Spring or Guice
Code Listing: AtmMain : DI without CDI, Spring or Guice: setTransport
Running the examples
Dependency Injection- AutomatedTellerMachine using CDI
Step 1: Create an empty bean.xml file under META-INF resource folder
META-INF/beans.xml
Code Listing: META-INF/beans.xml just as empty as can be
Step 2: Use the @Inject annotation to annotate a setTransport setter method in AutomatedTellerMachineImpl
Code Listing: AutomatedTellerMachineImpl using @Inject to inject a transport
Step 3: Use the @Default annotation to annotate the StandardAtmTransport
Code Listing: StandardAtmTransport using @Default
Step 4: Use the @Alternative to annotate the SoapAtmTransport , and JsonRestAtmTransport .
Code Listing: JsonRestAtmTransport using @Alternative
Code Listing: SoapAtmTransport using @Alternative
Step 5: Use the @Named annotation to make the AutomatedTellerMachineImpl easy to look up; give it the name "atm"
Code Listing: AutomatedTellerMachineImpl using @Named
Step 6: Use the CDI beanContainer to look up the atm , makes some deposits and withdraws.
Code Listing: AtmMain looking up the atm by name
Code Listing: AtmMain looking up the atm by type
Using @Inject to inject via constructor args and fields
Code Listing: AutomatedTellerMachineImpl.transport using @Inject to do field injection.
Code Listing: AutomatedTellerMachineImpl.transport using @Inject to do constructor injection.
Using simple @Produces
Code Listing: TransportFactory.createTransport using @Produces to define a factory method
Code Listing: AutomatedTellerMachineImpl receives the simple producer
Using @Alternative to select an Alternative
Code Listing: {classpath}/META-INF/beans.xml
Code Listing: Using @Qualifier to inject different types
Code Listing: Soap runtime qualifier annotation
Code Listing: SoapAtmTransport using new @Soap qualifier
Code Listing: AutomatedTellerMachineImpl injecting SoapAtmTransport using new @Soap qualifier via constructor arg
Code Listing: AutomatedTellerMachineImpl injecting SoapAtmTransport using new @Soap qualifier via setter method arg
Code Listing: AutomatedTellerMachineImpl injecting SoapAtmTransport using new @Soap qualifier via setter method arg
Using @Qualfiers to inject multiple types into the same bean using
Code Listing: AutomatedTellerMachineImpl injecting multiple transports using new multiple qualifiers
Using @Producer to make a decision about creation
Code Listing: TransportFactory deciding which transport to use/create
Using @Producer that uses qualifiers to make a decision about creation
Code Listing: TransportFactory injecting qualifier args
Using multiple @Qualifiers at the same injection point to discriminate further
Code Listing: SuperFast defining a new qualifier
Code Listing: StandardFrameRelaySwitchingFlubber defining another new qualifier
Code Listing: SuperFastAtmTransport uses two qualifiers
Code Listing: StandardAtmTransport changed to use one qualifier
Code Listing: AutomatedTellerMachineImpl changed to use two qualifier
Using @Qualfiers with members to discriminate injection and stop the explosion of annotation creation
Code Listing: Transport qualifier that has an enum member
Code Listing: TransportType enum that defines a type
Code Listing: SoapAtmTransport using @Transport(type=TransportType.SOAP)
Code Listing: StandardAtmTransport using @Transport(type=TransportType.STANDARD)
Code Listing: JsonRestAtmTransport using @Transport(type=TransportType.JSON)
Code Listing: AutomatedTellerMachineImpl using @Inject @Transport(type=TransportType.STANDARD)
Code Listing: Transport qualifier annotation with more than one member
Code Listing: AutomatedTellerMachineImpl using two qualifier members to discriminate
Conclusion
Resources
About the Author
Dependency Injection
Dependency Injection (DI) refers to the process of supplying an external dependency to a software component. DI can help make your code architecturally pure.
It aids in design by interface as well as test-driven development by providing a consistent way to inject dependencies. For example, a data access object (DAO) may depend on a database connection.
Instead of looking up the database connection with JNDI, you could inject it.
One way to think about a DI framework like CDI is to think of JNDI turned inside out. Instead of an object looking up other objects that it needs to get its job done (dependencies), a DI container injects those dependent objects. This is the so-called Hollywood Principle, "Don't call us�" (lookup objects), "we'll call you" (inject objects).
If you have worked with CRC cards you can think of a dependency as a collaborator. A collaborator is an object that another object needs to perform its role, like a DAO (data access object) needs a JDBC connection object for example.
Dependency Injection-AutomatedTellerMachine without CDI or Spring or Guice
Let's say that you have an automated teller machine (ATM, also known as an automated banking machine in other countries) and it needs the ability to talk to a bank. It uses what it calls a transport object to do this. In this example, a transport object handles the low-level communication to the bank.
This example could be represented by these two interfaces as follows:
Code Listing: AutomatedTellerMachine interface
package org.cdi.advocacy;
import java.math.BigDecimal;
public interface AutomatedTellerMachine {
public abstract void deposit(BigDecimal bd);
public abstract void withdraw(BigDecimal bd);
}
Code Listing: ATMTransport interface
package org.cdi.advocacy;
public interface ATMTransport {
public void communicateWithBank(byte[] datapacket);
}
Now the AutomatedTellerMachine needs a transport to perform its intent, namely withdraw money and deposit money. To carry out these tasks, the AutomatedTellerMachine may depend on many objects and collaborates with its dependencies to complete the work.
An implementation of the AutomatedTellerMachine may look like this:
Code Listing: AutomatedTellerMachineImpl class
package org.cdi.advocacy;
...
public class AutomatedTellerMachineImpl implements AutomatedTellerMachine {
private ATMTransport transport;
...
public void deposit(BigDecimal bd) {
System.out.println("deposit called");
transport.communicateWithBank(...);
}
public void withdraw(BigDecimal bd) {
System.out.println("withdraw called");
transport.communicateWithBank(...);
}
}
The AutomatedTellerMachineImpl does not know or care how the transport withdraws and deposits money from the bank. This level of indirection allows us to replace the transport with different implementations such as in the following example:
Three example transports: SoapAtmTransport, StandardAtmTransport and JsonAtmTransport
Code Listing: StandardAtmTransport
package org.cdi.advocacy;
public class StandardAtmTransport implements ATMTransport {
public void communicateWithBank(byte[] datapacket) {
System.out.println("communicating with bank via Standard transport");
...
}
}
Code Listing: SoapAtmTransport
package org.cdi.advocacy;
public class SoapAtmTransport implements ATMTransport {
public void communicateWithBank(byte[] datapacket) {
System.out.println("communicating with bank via Soap transport");
...
}
}
Code Listing: JsonRestAtmTransport
package org.cdi.advocacy;
public class JsonRestAtmTransport implements ATMTransport {
public void communicateWithBank(byte[] datapacket) {
System.out.println("communicating with bank via JSON REST transport");
}
}
Notice the possible implementations of the ATMTransport interface. The AutomatedTellerMachineImpl does not know or care which transport it uses. Also, for testing and developing, instead of talking to a real bank, you could easily use Mockito or EasyMock or you could even write a SimulationAtmTransport that was a mock implementation just for testing.
The concept of DI transcends CDI, Guice and Spring. Thus, you can accomplish DI without CDI, Guice or Spring as follows:
Code Listing: AtmMain: DI without CDI, Spring or Guice
package org.cdi.advocacy;
public class AtmMain {
public void main (String[] args) {
AutomatedTellerMachine atm = new AutomatedTellerMachineImpl();
ATMTransport transport = new SoapAtmTransport();
/* Inject the transport. */
((AutomatedTellerMachineImpl)atm).setTransport(transport);
atm.withdraw(new BigDecimal("10.00"));
atm.deposit(new BigDecimal("100.00"));
}
}
Then injecting a different transport is a mere matter of calling a different setter method as follows:
Code Listing: AtmMain: DI without CDI, Spring or Guice: setTransport
ATMTransport transport = new SimulationAtmTransport();
((AutomatedTellerMachineImpl)atm).setTransport(transport);
The above assumes we added a setTransport method to the AutomateTellerMachineImpl. Note you could just as easily use constructor arguments instead of a setter method. Thus keeping the interface of your AutomateTellerMachineImpl clean.
Running the examples
To run the examples quickly, we setup some maven pom.xml files for you. Here are the instructions to get the examples up and running.
Dependency Injection-AutomatedTellerMachine using CDI
To use CDI to manage the dependencies, do the following:
Create an empty bean.xml file under META-INF resource folder
Use the @Inject annotation to annotate a setTransport setter method in AutomatedTellerMachineImpl
Use the @Default annotation to annotate the StandardAtmTransport
Use the @Alternative to annotate the SoapAtmTransport, and JsonRestAtmTransport.
Use the @Named annotation to make the AutomatedTellerMachineImpl easy to look up; give it the name "atm"
Use the CDI beanContainer to look up the atm, makes some deposits and withdraws.
Step 1: Create an empty bean.xml file under META-INF resource folder
META-INF/beans.xml
CDI needs an bean.xml file to be in META-INF of your jar file or classpath or WEB-INF of your web application. This file can be completely empty (as in 0 bytes). If there is no beans.xml file in your META-INF or WEB-INF then that war file or jar file will not be processed by CDI. Otherwise, CDI will scan the jar and war file if the beans.xml file exists even if it is 0 bytes.
Code Listing: META-INF/beans.xml just as empty as can be
<beans xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xsi:schemaLocation="
http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee
http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee/beans_1_0.xsd">
</beans>
Notice that we included a starter beans.xml file with a namespace and a <beans> element. Although beans.xml could be completely empty, it is nice to have a starter file so when you need to add things (like later on in this tutorial) you can readily. Also it keeps the IDE from complaining about ill formed xml when you actually do have a 0 byte beans.xml. (I hate when the IDE complains. It is very distracting.)
Step 2: Use the @Inject annotation to annotate a setTransport setter method in AutomatedTellerMachineImpl
The @Inject annotation is used to mark where an injection goes. You can annotate constructor arguments, instance fields and setter methods of properties. In this example, we will annotate the setTransport method (which would be the setter method of the transport property).
Code Listing: AutomatedTellerMachineImpl using @Inject to inject a transport
package org.cdi.advocacy;
...
import javax.inject.Inject;
public class AutomatedTellerMachineImpl implements AutomatedTellerMachine {
private ATMTransport transport;
@Inject
public void setTransport(ATMTransport transport) {
this.transport = transport;
}
...
}
By default, CDI would look for a class that implements the ATMTransport interface, once it finds this it creates an instance and injects this instance of ATMTransport using the setter method setTransport. If we only had one possible instance of ATMTransport in our classpath, we would not need to annotate any of the ATMTransport implementations. Since we have three, namely, StandardAtmTransport, SoapAtmTransport, and JsonAtmTransport, we need to mark two of them as @Alternative's and one as @Default.
Step 3: Use the @Default annotation to annotate the StandardAtmTransport
At this stage of the example, we would like our default transport to be StandardAtmTransport; thus, we mark it as @Default as follows:
Code Listing: StandardAtmTransport using @Default
package org.cdi.advocacy;
import javax.enterprise.inject.Default;
@Default
public class StandardAtmTransport implements ATMTransport {
...
It should be noted that a class is @Default by default. Thus marking it so is redundant; and not only that its redundant.
Step 4: Use the @Alternative to annotate the SoapAtmTransport, and JsonRestAtmTransport.
If we don't mark the others as @Alternative, they are by default as far as CDI is concerned, marked as @Default. Let's mark JsonRestAtmTransport and SoapRestAtmTransport @Alternative so CDI does not get confused.
Code Listing: JsonRestAtmTransport using @Alternative
package org.cdi.advocacy;
import javax.enterprise.inject.Alternative;
@Alternative
public class JsonRestAtmTransport implements ATMTransport {
...
}
Code Listing: SoapAtmTransport using @Alternative
package org.cdi.advocacy;
import javax.enterprise.inject.Alternative;
@Alternative
public class SoapAtmTransport implements ATMTransport {
...
}
Step 5: Use the @Named annotation to make the AutomatedTellerMachineImpl easy to look up; give it the name "atm"
Since we are not using AutomatedTellerMachineImpl from a Java EE 6 application, let's just use the beanContainer to look it up. Let's give it an easy logical name like "atm". To give it a name, use the @Named annotation. The @Named annotation is also used by JEE 6 application to make the bean accessible via the Unified EL (EL stands for Expression language and it gets used by JSPs and JSF components).
Here is an example of using @Named to give the AutomatedTellerMachineImpl the name "atm"as follows:
Code Listing: AutomatedTellerMachineImpl using @Named
package org.cdi.advocacy;
import java.math.BigDecimal;
import javax.inject.Inject;
import javax.inject.Named;
@Named("atm")
public class AutomatedTellerMachineImpl implements AutomatedTellerMachine {
...
}
It should be noted that if you use the @Named annotations and don't provide a name, then the name is the name of the class with the first letter lower case so this:
@Named
public class AutomatedTellerMachineImpl implements AutomatedTellerMachine {
...
}
makes the name automatedTellerMachineImpl.
Step 6: Use the CDI beanContainer to look up the atm, makes some deposits and withdraws.
Lastly we want to look up the atm using the beanContainer and make some deposits.
Code Listing: AtmMain looking up the atm by name
package org.cdi.advocacy;
...
public class AtmMain {
...
...
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
AutomatedTellerMachine atm = (AutomatedTellerMachine) beanContainer
.getBeanByName("atm");
atm.deposit(new BigDecimal("1.00"));
}
}
When you run it from the command line, you should get the following:
Output
deposit called
communicating with bank via Standard transport
You can also lookup the AtmMain by type and an optional list of Annotations as the name is really to support the Unified EL (JSPs, JSF, etc.).
Code Listing: AtmMain looking up the atm by type
package org.cdi.advocacy;
...
public class AtmMain {
...
...
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
AutomatedTellerMachine atm = beanContainer.getBeanByType(AutomatedTellerMachine.class);
atm.deposit(new BigDecimal("1.00"));
}
}
Since a big part of CDI is its type safe injection, looking up things by name is probably discouraged. Notice we have one less cast due to Java Generics.
If you remove the @Default from the StandardATMTransport, you will get the same output. If you remove the @Alternative from both of the other transports, namely, JsonATMTransport, and SoapATMTransport, CDI will croak as follows:
Output
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError
Caused by: javax.enterprise.inject.AmbiguousResolutionException: org.cdi.advocacy.AutomatedTellerMachineImpl.setTransport:
Too many beans match, because they all have equal precedence.
See the @Stereotype and <enable> tags to choose a precedence. Beans:
ManagedBeanImpl[JsonRestAtmTransport, {@Default(), @Any()}]
ManagedBeanImpl[SoapAtmTransport, {@Default(), @Any()}]
ManagedBeanImpl[StandardAtmTransport, {@javax.enterprise.inject.Default(), @Any()}]
...
CDI expects to find one and only one qualified injection. Later we will discuss how to use an alternative.
Using @Inject to inject via constructor args and fields
You can inject into fields,constructor arguments and setter methods (or any method really).
Here is an example of field injections:
Code Listing: AutomatedTellerMachineImpl.transport using @Inject to do field injection.
...
public class AutomatedTellerMachineImpl implements AutomatedTellerMachine {
@Inject
private ATMTransport transport;
Code Listing: AutomatedTellerMachineImpl.transport using @Inject to do constructor injection.
...
public class AutomatedTellerMachineImpl implements AutomatedTellerMachine {
@Inject
public AutomatedTellerMachineImpl(ATMTransport transport) {
this.transport = transport;
}
This flexibility allows you to create classes that are easy to unit test.
Using simple @Produces
There are times when the creation of an object may be complex. Instead of relying on a constructor, you can delegate to a factory class to create the instance. To do this with CDI, you would use the @Produces from your factory class as follows:
Code Listing: TransportFactory.createTransport using @Produces to define a factory method
package org.cdi.advocacy;
import javax.enterprise.inject.Produces;
public class TransportFactory {
@Produces ATMTransport createTransport() {
System.out.println("ATMTransport created with producer");
return new StandardAtmTransport();
}
}
The factory method could use qualifiers just like a class declaration. In this example, we chose not to. The AutomatedTellerMachineImpl does not need to specify any special qualifiers. Here is the AutomatedTellerMachineImpl that receives the simple producer.
Code Listing: AutomatedTellerMachineImpl receives the simple producer
import javax.inject.Inject;
import javax.inject.Named;
@Named("atm")
public class AutomatedTellerMachineImpl implements AutomatedTellerMachine {
@Inject
private ATMTransport transport;
...
Check your understanding by looking at the output of running this with AtmMain.
Output
ATMTransport created with producer
deposit called
communicating with bank via Standard transport
Using @Alternative to select an Alternative
Earlier, you may recall, we defined several alternative transports, namely, JsonRestAtmTransport and SoapRestAtmTransport. Imagine that you are an installer of ATM machines and you need to configure certain transports at certain locations. Our previous injection points essentially inject the default which is the StandardRestAtmTransport transport.
If I need to install a different transport, all I need to do is change the /META-INF/beans.xml file to use the right transport as follows:
Code Listing: {classpath}/META-INF/beans.xml
<beans xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xsi:schemaLocation="
http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee
http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee/beans_1_0.xsd">
<alternatives>
<class>org.cdi.advocacy.JsonRestAtmTransport</class>
</alternatives>
</beans>
You can see from the output that the JSON REST transport is selected.
Output
deposit called
communicating with bank via JSON REST transport
Alternatives codifies and simplifies a very normal case in DI, namely, you have different injected objects based on different builds or environments. The great thing about objects is they can be replaced (Grady Booch said this). Alternatives allow you to mark objects that are replacements for other objects and then activate them when you need them.
If the DI container can have alternatives, let's mark them as alternatives. Think about it this way. I don't have to document all of the alternatives as much. It is self documenting. If someone knows CDI and they know about Alternatives they will not be surprised. Alternatives really canonicalizes the way you select an Alternative.
You can think of CDI as a canonicalization of many patterns that we have been using with more general purpose DI frameworks. The simplification and canonicalization is part of the evolution of DI.
Code Listing: Using @Qualifier to inject different types
All objects and producers in CDI have qualifiers. If you do not assign a qualifier it by default has the qualifier @Default and @Any. It is like a TV crime show in the U.S., if you do not have money for a lawyer, you will be assigned one.
Qualifiers can be used to discriminate exactly what gets injected. You can write custom qualifiers.
Qualifiers work like garanimal tags for kids clothes, you match the qualifier from the injection target and the injection source, then that is the type that will be injected.
If the tags (Qualifiers) match, then you have a match for injection.
You may decide that at times you want to inject Soap or Json or the Standard transport. You don't want to list them as an alternative. You actually, for example, always want the Json implementation in a certain case.
Here is an example of defining a qualifier for Soap.
Code Listing: Soap runtime qualifier annotation
package org.cdi.advocacy;
import java.lang.annotation.Retention;
import java.lang.annotation.Target;
import static java.lang.annotation.ElementType.*;
import static java.lang.annotation.RetentionPolicy.*;
import javax.inject.Qualifier;
@Qualifier @Retention(RUNTIME) @Target({TYPE, METHOD, FIELD, PARAMETER})
public @interface Soap {
}
Notice that a qualifier is just a runtime annotation that is marked with the @Qualifier annotation. The @Qualifier is an annotation that decorates a runtime annoation to make it a qualifier.
Then we would just mark the source of the injection point, namely, SoapAtmTransport with our new @Soap qualifier as follows:
Code Listing: SoapAtmTransport using new @Soap qualifier
package org.cdi.advocacy;
@Soap
public class SoapAtmTransport implements ATMTransport {
@Override
public void communicateWithBank(byte[] datapacket) {
System.out.println("communicating with bank via Soap transport");
}
}
Next time you are ready to inject a Soap transport we can do that by annotating the argument to the constructor as follows:
Code Listing: AutomatedTellerMachineImpl injecting SoapAtmTransport using new @Soap qualifier via constructor arg
public class AutomatedTellerMachineImpl implements AutomatedTellerMachine {
private ATMTransport transport;
@Inject
public AutomatedTellerMachineImpl(@Soap ATMTransport transport) {
this.transport = transport;
}
You could also choose to do this via the setter method for the property as follows:
Code Listing: AutomatedTellerMachineImpl injecting SoapAtmTransport using new @Soap qualifier via setter method arg
public class AutomatedTellerMachineImpl implements AutomatedTellerMachine {
private ATMTransport transport;
@Inject
public void setTransport(@Soap ATMTransport transport) {
this.transport = transport;
}
And a very common option is to use a field level injection as follows:
Code Listing: AutomatedTellerMachineImpl injecting SoapAtmTransport using new @Soap qualifier via setter method arg
public class AutomatedTellerMachineImpl implements AutomatedTellerMachine {
@Inject @Soap
private ATMTransport transport;
From this point on, we are just going to use field level injection to simplify the examples.
Using @Qualfiers to inject multiple types into the same bean using
Let's say that our ATM machine uses different transport based on some business rules that are configured in LDAP or config file or XML or a database (does not really matter).
The point is you want it decided at runtime which transport we are going to use.
In this scenario we may want to inject three different transports and then configure a transport based on the business rules.
You are going to want to get notified when the injection is done and the bean is ready to go from a CDI perspective. To get this notifcation you would annotated an init method with the @PostConstruct annotation. Then you could pick which type of transport that you want to use.
Note the name of the method does not matter, it is the annotation that makes it an init method.
Code Listing: AutomatedTellerMachineImpl injecting multiple transports using new multiple qualifiers
package org.cdi.advocacy;
import java.math.BigDecimal;
import javax.annotation.PostConstruct;
import javax.inject.Inject;
import javax.inject.Named;
@Named("atm")
public class AutomatedTellerMachineImpl implements AutomatedTellerMachine {
private ATMTransport transport;
@Inject @Soap
private ATMTransport soapTransport;
@Inject @Json
private ATMTransport jsonTransport;
@Inject @Json
private ATMTransport standardTransport;
//These could be looked up in a DB, JNDI or a properties file.
private boolean useJSON = true;
private boolean behindFireWall = true;
@PostConstruct
protected void init() {
//Look up values for useJSON and behindFireWall
if (!behindFireWall) {
transport = standardTransport;
} else {
if (useJSON) {
transport = jsonTransport;
} else {
transport = soapTransport;
}
}
}
public void deposit(BigDecimal bd) {
System.out.println("deposit called");
transport.communicateWithBank(null);
}
...
}
Try to follow the code above. Try to guess the output. Now compare it to this:
Output
deposit called
communicating with bank via JSON REST transport
How did you do?
Using @Producer to make a decision about creation
This example builds on the last.
Perhaps you want to seperate the construction and selection of the transports from the AutomatedTellerMachineImpl.
You could create a Producer factory method that makes a decision about the creation and selection of the transport as follows:
Code Listing: TransportFactory deciding which transport to use/create
package org.cdi.advocacy;
import javax.enterprise.inject.Produces;
public class TransportFactory {
private boolean useJSON = true;
private boolean behindFireWall = true;
@Produces ATMTransport createTransport() {
//Look up config parameters in some config file or LDAP server or database
System.out.println("ATMTransport created with producer makes decisions");
if (behindFireWall) {
if (useJSON) {
System.out.println("Created JSON transport");
return new JsonRestAtmTransport();
} else {
System.out.println("Created SOAP transport");
return new SoapAtmTransport();
}
} else {
System.out.println("Created Standard transport");
return new StandardAtmTransport();
}
}
}
The advantage of this approach is that the logic to do the creation, is separate from the actual AutomatedTellerMachineImpl code.
This may not always be what you want, but if it is, then the producer can help you.
The output should be the same as before.
Output
ATMTransport created with producer makes decisions
Created JSON transport
deposit called
communicating with bank via JSON REST transport
Using @Producer that uses qualifiers to make a decision about creation
This example builds on the last.
You can also inject items as arguments into the producer as follows:
Code Listing: TransportFactory injecting qualifier args
package org.cdi.advocacy;
import javax.enterprise.inject.Produces;
public class TransportFactory {
private boolean useJSON = true;
private boolean behindFireWall = true;
@Produces ATMTransport createTransport( @Soap ATMTransport soapTransport,
@Json ATMTransport jsonTransport) {
//Look up config parameters in some config file
System.out.println("ATMTransport created with producer makes decisions");
if (behindFireWall) {
if (useJSON) {
System.out.println("return passed JSON transport");
return jsonTransport;
} else {
System.out.println("return passed SOAP transport");
return soapTransport;
}
} else {
System.out.println("Create Standard transport");
return new StandardAtmTransport();
}
}
}
In the above example, createTransport becomes less of a factory method and more of a selection method as CDI actually creates and passes the soapTransport and the jsonTransport.
Advanced topic: (Ignore this if it does not make sense) You may wonder why I create StandardAtmTransport and not inject it as a producer argument like soapTransport and jsonTransport. The problem is this createTransport is by default @Default and @Any but it overrides the StandardAtmTransport which is also by default @Default and @Any, but since StandardAtmTransport is overidden then if I inject @Default ATMTransport standardTransport as an argument then it tries to call createTransport since it is the @Default, which will then try to inject the argument standardTransport, which will then call createTransport, ad infinitum until we get a StackTraceOverflow. The solution is create a qualifier for the standard, say, @Standard and use that to do the injection, or create one for the createProduces production, say, @Transport. The key here is that the injection arguments of a producer have to have different qualifiers than the production method or all hell breaks lose, cats sleeping with dogs, pandimodium. Ok. Okay. The key here is that the injection arguments have to have different qualifiers than the production method or you will get a StackTraceOverflow as CDI calls your production method to resovle the injection point of you production method ad infinitum.
Here is the expected output.
Output
ATMTransport created with producer makes decisions
return passed JSON transport
deposit called
communicating with bank via JSON REST transport
Using multiple @Qualifiers at the same injection point to discriminate further
You can use more than one qaulifier to further discriminate your injection target.
To demonstrate this let's define to qualifiers SuperFast and StandardFrameRelaySwitchingFlubber. Let's say at the time we have two transports that are StandardFrameRelaySwitchingFlubber. Let's also say that you want to inject a transport that is not only a StandardFrameRelaySwitchingFlubber but also SuperFast.
First let's define the qualifier annotations as follows:
Code Listing: SuperFast defining a new qualifier
package org.cdi.advocacy;
...
@Qualifier @Retention(RUNTIME) @Target({TYPE, METHOD, FIELD, PARAMETER})
public @interface SuperFast {
}
Code Listing: StandardFrameRelaySwitchingFlubber defining another new qualifier
package org.cdi.advocacy;
...
@Qualifier @Retention(RUNTIME) @Target({TYPE, METHOD, FIELD, PARAMETER})
public @interface StandardFrameRelaySwitchingFlubber {
}
Ok, here is the code for the SuperFastAtmTransport which is marked with both the @SuperFast and the @StandardFrameRelaySwitchingFlubber qualifiers.
Code Listing: SuperFastAtmTransport uses two qualifiers
package org.cdi.advocacy;
@SuperFast @StandardFrameRelaySwitchingFlubber
public class SuperFastAtmTransport implements ATMTransport {
public void communicateWithBank(byte[] datapacket) {
System.out.println("communicating with bank via the Super Fast transport " );
}
}
Ok, we add the StandardFrameRelaySwitchingFlubber to the StandardAtmTransport as well.
Code Listing: StandardAtmTransport changed to use one qualifier
package org.cdi.advocacy;
@StandardFrameRelaySwitchingFlubber @Default
public class StandardAtmTransport implements ATMTransport {
public void communicateWithBank(byte[] datapacket) {
System.out.println("communicating with bank via Standard transport");
}
}
Next if I want my AutomatedTellerMachineImpl to have SuperFast transport with StandardFrameRelaySwitchingFlubber, I would use both in the injection target as follows:
Code Listing: AutomatedTellerMachineImpl changed to use two qualifier
public class AutomatedTellerMachineImpl implements AutomatedTellerMachine {
@Inject @SuperFast @StandardFrameRelaySwitchingFlubber
private ATMTransport transport;
...
Output:
deposit called
communicating with bank via the Super Fast transport
Exercise: Create a transport that is @SuperFast, @StandardFrameRelaySwitchingFlubber and an @Alternative. Then use beans.xml to activate this SuperFast, StandardFrameRelaySwitchingFlubber, Alternative transport. Send me your solution on the CDI group mailing list. The first one to send gets put on the CDI wall of fame.
Exercise for the reader. Change the injection point qualifiers to make only the StandardAtmTransport get injected. Send me your solution on the CDI group mailing list. Don't get discouraged if you get a stack trace or two that is part of the learning process. The first one to send gets put on the CDI wall of fame (everyone else gets an honorable mention).
Using @Qualfiers with members to discriminate injection and stop the explosion of annotation creation
There could be an explosion of qualifers annotations in your project. Imagine in our example if there were 20 types of transports. We would have 20 annotations defined.
This is probably not want you want. It is okay if you have a few, but it could quickly become unmanageable.
CDI allows you to descriminate on members of a qualifier to reduce the explosion of qualifiers. Instead of having three qualifier you could have one qualifier and an enum. Then if you need more types of transports, you only have to add an enum value instead of another class.
Let's demonstrate how this works by creating a new qualifier annotation called Transport. The Transport qualifier annotation will have a single member, an enum called type. The type member will be an new enum that we define called TransportType.
Here is the new TransportType:
Code Listing: Transport qualifier that has an enum member
package org.cdi.advocacy;
import java.lang.annotation.Retention;
import java.lang.annotation.Target;
import static java.lang.annotation.ElementType.*;
import static java.lang.annotation.RetentionPolicy.*;
import javax.inject.Qualifier;
@Qualifier @Retention(RUNTIME) @Target({TYPE, METHOD, FIELD, PARAMETER})
public @interface Transport {
TransportType type() default TransportType.STANDARD;
}
Here is the new enum that is part of the TransportType.
Code Listing: TransportType enum that defines a type
package org.cdi.advocacy;
public enum TransportType {
JSON, SOAP, STANDARD;
}
Next you need to qualify your transport instances like so:
Code Listing: SoapAtmTransport using @Transport(type=TransportType.SOAP)
package org.cdi.advocacy;
@Transport(type=TransportType.SOAP)
public class SoapAtmTransport implements ATMTransport {
...
Code Listing: StandardAtmTransport using @Transport(type=TransportType.STANDARD)
package org.cdi.advocacy;
@Transport(type=TransportType.STANDARD)
public class StandardAtmTransport implements ATMTransport {
...
Code Listing: JsonRestAtmTransport using @Transport(type=TransportType.JSON)
package org.cdi.advocacy;
@Transport(type=TransportType.JSON)
public class JsonRestAtmTransport implements ATMTransport {
...
Code Listing: AutomatedTellerMachineImpl using @Inject @Transport(type=TransportType.STANDARD)
@Named("atm")
public class AutomatedTellerMachineImpl implements AutomatedTellerMachine {
@Inject @Transport(type=TransportType.STANDARD)
private ATMTransport transport;
As always, you will want to run the example.
Output
deposit called
communicating with bank via Standard transport
You can have more than one member of the qualifier annotation as follows:
Code Listing: Transport qualifier annotation with more than one member
package org.cdi.advocacy;
import java.lang.annotation.Retention;
import java.lang.annotation.Target;
import static java.lang.annotation.ElementType.*;
import static java.lang.annotation.RetentionPolicy.*;
import javax.inject.Qualifier;
@Qualifier @Retention(RUNTIME) @Target({TYPE, METHOD, FIELD, PARAMETER})
public @interface Transport {
TransportType type() default TransportType.STANDARD;
int priorityLevel() default -1;
}
Now CDI is going to use both of the members to discriminate for injection.
If we had a transport like so:
Code Listing: AutomatedTellerMachineImpl using two qualifier members to discriminate
public class AutomatedTellerMachineImpl implements AutomatedTellerMachine {
@Inject @Transport(type=TransportType.STANDARD, priorityLevel=1)
private ATMTransport transport;
Then we get this:
Output
deposit called
communicating with bank via the Super Fast transport
You can match using any type supported by annotations, e.g., Strings, classes, enums, ints, etc.
Exercise: Add a member String to the qualifier annotation. Change the injection point to discriminate using this new string member. Why do you think this is counter to what CDI stands for? Send me your solution on the CDI group mailing list. The first one to send gets put on the CDI wall of fame. (All others get honorable mentions.)
Conclusion
Dependency Injection (DI) refers to the process of supplying an external dependency to a software component.
CDI is the Java standard for dependency injection and interception (AOP). It is evident from the popularity of DI and AOP that Java needs to address DI and AOP so that it can build other standards on top of it. DI and AOP are the foundation of many Java frameworks. I hope you share my vision of CDI as a basis for other JSRs, Java frameworks and standards.
This article discussed CDI dependency injection in a tutorial format. It covers some of the features of CDI such as type safe annotations configuration, alternatives and more. There was an introduction level and and advacned level.
CDI is a foundational aspect of Java EE 6. It is or will be shortly supported by Caucho's Resin, IBM's WebSphere, Oracle's Glassfish, Red Hat's JBoss and many more application servers. CDI is similar to core Spring and Guice frameworks. However CDI is a general purpose framework that can be used outside of JEE 6.
CDI is a rethink on how to do dependency injection and AOP (interception really). It simplifies it. It reduces it. It gets rid of legacy, outdated ideas.
CDI is to Spring and Guice what JPA is to Hibernate, and Toplink. CDI will co-exist with Spring and Guice. There are plugins to make them interoperate nicely. There is more integration option on the way.
This is just a brief taste. There is more to come
发表评论
-
spring send gmail
2012-04-24 11:06 1148只要这样配置好久能使用gmail了 <bean id= ... -
log4j 常用配置
2012-03-22 21:02 1100原文地址:http://www.benmccann.com/d ... -
struts2 排除拦截部分路径
2011-11-30 13:27 5785情况:在web.xml中配置一个servlet映射路径为/te ... -
java image scale
2011-07-20 13:47 931http://code.google.com/p/java-i ... -
实现自定义截取图片
2011-07-13 17:30 1110几种插件: http://odyniec.net/projec ... -
jms基础概念和应用场景
2011-07-01 13:55 1606原文地址:http://blog.csdn.net/KimmK ... -
Envers –tracked your Entity Objects
2011-06-29 09:05 1582原文地址:http://get2java.wordpress. ... -
JSON Compression algorithms: HPack VS CJSON
2011-06-28 17:24 3162总结:HPack 优于 CJSON json1 json2 ... -
Why we don’t use Doubles for Financial Calculations
2011-06-27 11:14 1296原文地址:http://bloodredsun.com/?p= ... -
http://jbaruch.wordpress.com/2011/06/22/unified-logging-using-slf4j/
2011-06-27 10:48 1213原文地址:http://jbaruch.wordpress.c ... -
Sturts2 全局异常日志
2011-06-25 10:50 1814原文地址:http://www.brucephillips.n ... -
eclipse的build与clean
2011-06-22 09:01 1582现象:无论怎么改变代码,程序的行为始终不变,一直报错。。。。 ... -
jfreechart 图标各部分名字
2011-06-09 19:57 843图标各部分名字 -
jfreechart 自定义饼图颜色
2011-06-09 18:52 4909关键代码: private static class Pi ... -
jfreechart demo 代码
2011-06-07 18:33 2962jfreechart 官方demo 源代码 -
jfreechart 中文问题
2011-06-07 16:52 951基本如果将jfreechart生成图片的字体多改成中文的字体就 ... -
SVN 安装
2011-05-30 15:45 1022collabnet svn 现在出了整和的SVN EDGE。这 ... -
amazon 云计算
2011-05-28 21:45 1086最近看了amazon的云计算 ... -
c3p0 java.lang.Exception: DEBUG -- CLOSE BY CLIENT STACK TRACE
2011-05-28 16:07 1590修改日志级别为info http://hi.baidu.com ... -
mybatis打印sql
2011-05-09 15:03 20016mybatis默认使用log4j,当有self4j这个日志ja ...
相关推荐
Java 9 Dependency Injection - Nilang Patel Java 9 Dependency Injection - Nilang Patel Java 9 Dependency Injection - Nilang Patel
依赖注入(Dependency Injection,简称DI)是一种设计模式,它在软件工程中被广泛应用于构建松散耦合的系统。在Java开发中,Spring框架是最知名的实现依赖注入的库之一。本资源“依赖注入:Dependency injection-...
这个压缩包"dependency_injection-1_0-final-spec.zip"包含了对Java依赖注入规范1.0版本的详细定义,包括API jar文件(javax.inject.jar)、Javadoc文档(javax.inject-javadoc.zip)以及源码(javax.inject-src.zip...
1. 定期更新dependency-check工具到最新版本,以获取最新的安全数据和修复。 2. 配置输出报告格式,如XML、HTML,以便于查看和存档。 3. 将dependency-check集成到CI/CD流程,确保每次代码变更后都会进行安全检查。 ...
本文将通过分析"making-sense-dependency-injection-test-execution-listener-源码"来深入探讨这两个概念。 1. 依赖注入(Dependency Injection) 依赖注入的核心思想是,对象不应该自行创建或查找它所依赖的对象...
《Python依赖注入库详解——以python-dependency-injection-0.3为例》 在Python编程领域,依赖注入(Dependency Injection,简称DI)是一种设计模式,它有助于提高代码的可测试性和可维护性。当我们谈论`python-...
开源项目“mtojek-dependency-injection-in-go”是一个基于Go语言实现的依赖注入框架,遵循了"Keep It Simple, Stupid"(KISS)原则。依赖注入是一种设计模式,它允许我们解耦组件之间的关系,使得代码更加灵活、可...
maven-dependency-plugin-2.8.jar
PART 1 Putting Dependency Injection on the map Chapter 1. The Basics Of Dependency Injection: What, Why, And How Chapter 2. Writing Tightly Coupled Code Chapter 3. Writing Loosely Coupled Code PART 2 ...
1. **dependency-check/bin**:这个目录包含用于不同操作系统的可执行脚本,如Windows的`dependency-check.bat`和Linux/Unix的`dependency-check.sh`,这些脚本允许用户在命令行环境中运行依赖检查。 2. **...
dependency-injection-example, 依赖注入简介 依赖项注入示例依赖注入不一定是复杂的。 让我们一起解决吧 !是什么?依赖注入是一种方便管理类依赖性的技术,并且允许使用模拟技术更好地测试。 在互联网上有很多例子...
sonar安全扫描插件
依赖注入(Dependency Injection,简称DI)是一种设计模式,它在软件工程中被广泛应用于解耦组件之间的依赖关系,使得代码更易于测试、扩展和维护。在这个"dependency_injection-develop-源码"压缩包中,我们可以...
maven-dependency-versions-check-plugin-2.0.2-sources.jar
maven-dependency-tree-parser-1.0.6.jar,用于mvn depenency:tree的记录解析
### 《Dependency Injection》电子书知识点总结 #### 一、依赖注入(Dependency Injection,简称DI)概述 **依赖注入**是一种设计模式,旨在减少代码之间的耦合度,并提高组件的可测试性和灵活性。通过将一个类所...
maven-dependency-tree-1.2.jar
maven-dependencygraph-plugin-0.0.4-sources.jar
maven-dependencygraph-plugin-0.0.3-sources.jar
maven-dependencygraph-plugin-0.0.2-sources.jar