为什么废弃stop方法

终断一个线程，可以用thread.interrupt( ) 和stop方法。
stop现在已经废弃，不推荐使用。
stop 是不安全的，通过与interrupt()的比较，可以看到stop是哪里不安全。
代码如下：

public class ThreadTest {

	public static void main(String[] args) {

		try {
			System.out.println("try");
			Thread thread = new MyThread();
			thread.start();
			thread.stop();
			// thread.interrupt();
		} catch (Exception e) {
			System.out.println("exception");
		} finally {
			System.out.println("finally");
		}
	}
}

class MyThread extends Thread {

	public void run() {
		try {
			System.out.println("run");
			Thread.sleep(1000L);
			throw new Exception();
		} catch (Exception e) {
			System.out.println("exception ");
		}
	}
}

console输出的结果是：
try
finally

可以看到，stop终结一个线程，并且释放监控线程的所有资源。对于主线程来说，并不能再跟踪线程的运行状况，当线程出现异常也不能被捕获。而其他线程并不知道被stop的线程出现了异常。这样导致状态不一致的情况产生。

注释掉stop 一行，换用interrupt,进行测试。输出结果是：
try
finally
run
exception



以下是jdk的英文。
  

 /** 
     * Forces the thread to stop executing.
     * <p>
     * If there is a security manager installed, its <code>checkAccess</code>
     * method is called with <code>this</code> 
     * as its argument. This may result in a 
     * <code>SecurityException</code> being raised (in the current thread). 
     * <p>
     * If this thread is different from the current thread (that is, the current
     * thread is trying to stop a thread other than itself), the
     * security manager's <code>checkPermission</code> method (with a
     * <code>RuntimePermission("stopThread")</code> argument) is called in
     * addition.
     * Again, this may result in throwing a 
     * <code>SecurityException</code> (in the current thread). 
     * <p>
     * The thread represented by this thread is forced to stop whatever 
     * it is doing abnormally and to throw a newly created 
     * <code>ThreadDeath</code> object as an exception. 
     * <p>
     * It is permitted to stop a thread that has not yet been started. 
     * If the thread is eventually started, it immediately terminates. 
     * <p>
     * An application should not normally try to catch 
     * <code>ThreadDeath</code> unless it must do some extraordinary 
     * cleanup operation (note that the throwing of 
     * <code>ThreadDeath</code> causes <code>finally</code> clauses of 
     * <code>try</code> statements to be executed before the thread 
     * officially dies).  If a <code>catch</code> clause catches a 
     * <code>ThreadDeath</code> object, it is important to rethrow the 
     * object so that the thread actually dies. 
     * <p>
     * The top-level error handler that reacts to otherwise uncaught 
     * exceptions does not print out a message or otherwise notify the 
     * application if the uncaught exception is an instance of 
     * <code>ThreadDeath</code>. 
     *
     * @exception  SecurityException  if the current thread cannot 
     *               modify this thread.
     * @see        #interrupt()
     * @see        #checkAccess()
     * @see        #run()
     * @see        #start()
     * @see        ThreadDeath
     * @see        ThreadGroup#uncaughtException(Thread,Throwable)
     * @see        SecurityManager#checkAccess(Thread)
     * @see        SecurityManager#checkPermission
     * @deprecated This method is inherently unsafe.  Stopping a thread with
     *	     Thread.stop causes it to unlock all of the monitors that it
     *	     has locked (as a natural consequence of the unchecked
     *	     <code>ThreadDeath</code> exception propagating up the stack).  If
     *       any of the objects previously protected by these monitors were in
     *       an inconsistent state, the damaged objects become visible to
     *       other threads, potentially resulting in arbitrary behavior.  Many
     *       uses of <code>stop</code> should be replaced by code that simply
     *       modifies some variable to indicate that the target thread should
     *       stop running.  The target thread should check this variable  
     *       regularly, and return from its run method in an orderly fashion
     *       if the variable indicates that it is to stop running.  If the
     *       target thread waits for long periods (on a condition variable,
     *       for example), the <code>interrupt</code> method should be used to
     *       interrupt the wait. 
     *       For more information, see 
     *       <a href="{@docRoot}/../technotes/guides/concurrency/threadPrimitiveDeprecation.html">Why 
     *       are Thread.stop, Thread.suspend and Thread.resume Deprecated?</a>.
     */
    @Deprecated
    public final void stop() {
        // If the thread is already dead, return.
	// A zero status value corresponds to "NEW".
	if ((threadStatus != 0) && !isAlive()) {
	    return;
	}
	stop1(new ThreadDeath());
    }